Déjà vu and the postdictive bias

0
35

For many, déjà vu is just a fleeting, eerie sensation that “I’ve been here before.”

For others, it gets even eerier: In that moment of unsettling familiarity, they also feel certain they know what’s going to happen next – like, a girl in a white shirt is going to pass me on the left.

And when the girl in the white shirt really does pass by, well, what can explain it? Cue theories of past lives, clairvoyance, and the supernatural.

Not so fast, says Anne Cleary, a memory researcher at Colorado State University who is one of the world’s experts on déjà vu.

A dogged scientist who uses laboratory experiments to induce déjà vu in human subjects, Cleary has a new theory on why déjà vu is accompanied not only by feelings of prediction, but also an “I knew that was going to happen” feeling a minute later.

Cleary’s most recent déjà vu experiments, published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, document evidence of such a “postdictive” bias in déjà vu experiencers in the lab, and offers a plausible explanation for why it happens.

Prior experiments had uncovered a strong predictive bias in people having déjà vu – that they feel like they know what’s going to happen next.

But in the lab, people who were having déjà vu were not able to actually predict what was going to happen next. That predictive feeling, however intense, was just that – a feeling.

“If this is an illusion – just a feeling – why do people so strongly believe they actually predicted what unfolded next?” said Cleary, a professor in the CSU Department of Psychology.

“I wondered if there was an explanation in some sort of cognitive illusion.”

To test that theory in the lab, Cleary and co-authors immersed a bank of test subjects in a video game-like scene created in the Sims virtual world.

Subjects were asked if they were experiencing déjà vu.

Next, the virtual scene would turn left or right.

Then participants were asked, did the scene unfold the way you expected?

In a later experiment, participants were further asked to rate the familiarity of the scene, both before and after the turn.

After crunching their results, the researchers found that when intense feelings of prediction accompanied déjà vu, they were strongly correlated with feelings of “postdiction” – that the person reported, after the fact, that they knew what particular turn was going to happen.

But the experiment was set up so it would be impossible for them to know, because the turns were made at random.

The “I knew that was going to happen” bias was very strong when déjà vu occurred, and especially strong when the scene happened to be rated as very familiar.

But, like the feelings of prediction, the feelings of having gotten the prediction right were not rooted in reality.

In other words, déjà vu gave the subjects not only predictive feelings, but a strong hindsight bias after the fact.

Cleary’s team concluded that the high degree of familiarity that accompanies déjà vu also carries through to the postdictive bias.

“If the entire scene feels intensely familiar as it unfolds, that might trick our brains into thinking we got it right after all,” Cleary said. “Because it felt so familiar as you were going through it, it felt like you knew all along how it was going to go, even if that could not have been the case.”

So the “I knew that was going to happen” bias is probably all part of the illusion of prediction that often accompanies déjà vu, Cleary says.

According to her prior experiments, déjà vu is a memory phenomenon in which we’re trying to retrieve a memory, but we can’t place it – sort of like the feeling of a word on the tip of your tongue.

She has previously demonstrated in the lab that when scenes in the Sims mapped spatially to different scenes that were viewed earlier but forgotten, more instances of déjà vu occur.

After crunching their results, the researchers found that when intense feelings of prediction accompanied déjà vu, they were strongly correlated with feelings of “postdiction” – that the person reported, after the fact, that they knew what particular turn was going to happen.

Cleary was driven to do experiments probing the postdictive bias because it felt like a missing puzzle piece to her existing theories on why déjà vu tends to be associated with clairvoyance.

Since she started studying déjà vu over a decade ago, she’s had countless people describe to her their déjà vu experiences, including when they were very sure they’d predicted something without explanation. A

nd it’s not just people who believe in the supernatural; many of them are what she calls “trained skeptics” ­- even fellow memory researchers – who report extremely unsettling déjà vu experiences in which they feel like they predicted what was going to happen next.

Cleary’s work continues: She’s teaming up with neuroscientists at Emory University who work with patients who have injuries to the medial temporal lobe, a part of the brain associated with seizures that can be accompanied by severe, recurring déjà vu.

She’s also setting up experiments in which déjà vu might be experienced through auditory channels, rather than visual.

“Déjà entendu” is a phrase that means you swear you’ve heard something before but can’t place it. It may be another aspect of lapsed recall that Cleary is exploring with her students.


Déjà Vu and Familiarity
Familiarity-based recognition occurs when one has the feeling that something has been experienced before, despite not recalling any specifics about the prior experience (e.g., Mandler, 2008).

An example is recognizing a face as familiar without identifying where or when the face was seen before.

The feeling of familiarity that underlies familiarity-based recognition may also contribute to experiences of déjà vu (Cleary, 2008).

Is Déjà Vu Related to Familiarity?
There are three lines of evidence that déjà vu may be related to familiarity. One line comes from correlational data. The frequency with which people report experiencing déjà vu is positively correlated with the frequency with which people report traveling (Brown, 2003), dreaming (Brown, 2003), and watching movies (Wallisch, 2007).
These correlations are consistent with the idea that déjà vu relates to familiarity: People who travel, dream, or watch movies more often should have more potential sources of familiarity stored in memory than people who rarely do these things.
The second line of evidence comes from a study by Brown and Marsh (2008), in which students viewed pictures of scenes—some from the students’ own campus and some from a faraway campus.

The students later attempted to discriminate previously visited from non- previously visited scenes. They were more likely to judge that they had previously visited a scene from a faraway campus when that scene was previously presented within the context of the experiment. In short, when the feeling of familiarity was unaccompanied by retrieval of the familiarity’s source, it led to a sense of having been there before.

This hints at a potential link between familiarity and déjà vu. The third line of evidence comes from a case study of a patient who, prior to surgical intervention, experienced déjà vu during seizures (Bowles et al., 2007).

Although the surgical intervention relieved the patient of seizures, she was subsequently impaired in familiarity-based, but not recollection-based, recognition on a number of recognition tasks.

This postsurgery impairment, along with the seizure-induced déjà vu that she experienced prior to surgery, also suggests a possible relationship between familiarity-based recognition and déjà vu.


Source:
Colorado State University
Media Contacts:
Anne Manning – Colorado State University
Image Source:
The image is in the public domain.

Original Research: Open access
“A postdictive bias associated with déjà vu”. Anne Cleary et al.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review doi:10.3758/s13423-019-01578-w.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Questo sito usa Akismet per ridurre lo spam. Scopri come i tuoi dati vengono elaborati.