On May 13, 2025, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to the Adampur Air Force Station in Punjab marked a pivotal moment in countering Pakistan’s claims regarding the destruction of India’s S-400 air defense system during a four-day military escalation. The visit, strategically timed and visually documented, showcased the operational integrity of the S-400, a Russian-supplied surface-to-air missile system integral to India’s defense architecture. Pakistan’s assertions, propagated through state-affiliated media and amplified on social platforms, alleged that its JF-17 fighter jets and Fatah-II missiles had obliterated the S-400 and rendered the Adampur base inoperable. These claims were swiftly debunked by visual evidence from Modi’s visit, which displayed the system intact, alongside an MiG-29 jet, signaling India’s military resilience. This episode underscores the broader dynamics of disinformation in modern warfare, the strategic role of the S-400 in India’s defense posture, and the geopolitical implications of the 2025 India-Pakistan conflict. Drawing on verified data from authoritative sources, this article examines the technological, strategic, and informational dimensions of the event, contextualizing it within the broader framework of South Asian security.
The S-400 Triumf, developed by Russia’s Almaz-Antey, is a long-range air defense system capable of engaging targets at ranges up to 400 kilometers and altitudes of 30 kilometers. India’s acquisition of five S-400 regiments, valued at $5.43 billion, was formalized in 2018, with deliveries commencing in 2021, as reported by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) in its 2022 arms transfer database. Deployed at strategic locations, including Adampur, approximately 80 kilometers from the Pakistan border, the system enhances India’s ability to counter aerial threats, including missiles and drones. The Adampur deployment, confirmed by India’s Ministry of Defence in its 2024 annual report, strengthens the Indian Air Force’s operational capacity in Punjab, a region critical due to its proximity to Pakistan. The S-400’s radar systems, notably the 91N6E Big Bird, provide 360-degree coverage and can track up to 100 targets simultaneously, according to a 2023 technical assessment by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). This capability proved instrumental during Operation Sindoor, a defensive campaign launched in response to Pakistan’s drone and missile incursions between May 8 and May 11, 2025, as detailed in a press release by the Indian Ministry of Defence on May 12, 2025.
Pakistan’s claims of destroying the S-400 emerged on May 10, 2025, through a statement broadcast by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), asserting that a JF-17 Thunder jet had struck the Adampur base, disabling the runway, radar, and S-400 system. Accompanying these claims were alleged satellite images, later identified as manipulated, showing a damaged runway and destroyed equipment. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), in a May 11, 2025, analysis of open-source satellite imagery from Planet Labs, confirmed no visible damage to Adampur’s infrastructure, contradicting Pakistan’s narrative. The ISPR further claimed that the attack killed 60 personnel and destroyed multiple jets, assertions unsupported by any independent verification. The World Bank’s 2025 South Asia Security Brief noted that such exaggerated claims align with Pakistan’s historical use of disinformation to project military success domestically, citing similar tactics during the 2019 Balakot airstrike aftermath.
Prime Minister Modi’s visit to Adampur on May 13, 2025, was a calculated response to these claims. Photographs released by the Prime Minister’s Office, archived on the Government of India’s Press Information Bureau website, depicted Modi inspecting the base with the S-400 system prominently visible, operational, and undamaged. The imagery, corroborated by Reuters and BBC reporting on May 13, 2025, served as a visual rebuttal, undermining Pakistan’s narrative. The Indian Ministry of External Affairs, in a May 13 press briefing, emphasized that the visit was not only a morale-boosting gesture for troops but also a deliberate act to counter disinformation. The presence of the S-400 in the background, as noted by the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA) in a May 14, 2025, commentary, symbolized India’s technological superiority and operational readiness, reinforcing its deterrence posture.
The strategic significance of the S-400 lies in its integration into India’s multi-layered air defense network, which includes indigenous systems like the Akash and Barak-8, co-developed with Israel. The IISS, in its 2024 Military Balance report, highlights India’s investment in layered defense systems to counter Pakistan’s growing missile and drone capabilities, including the Fatah-II, a 400-kilometer-range rocket system deployed near the border in 2024, as reported by the Pakistan Army’s official website. During Operation Sindoor, the S-400’s ability to neutralize Pakistan’s swarm drones, which the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) in its 2025 report on drone warfare identifies as low-cost, high-volume threats, underscored its operational efficacy. The Indian Air Force’s after-action report, published on May 12, 2025, by Janes Defence Weekly, confirmed that the S-400 intercepted 92% of incoming drones, significantly limiting damage to strategic assets.
Disinformation, as exemplified by Pakistan’s claims, is a critical component of hybrid warfare in South Asia. The Oxford Internet Institute, in a 2025 study on computational propaganda, notes that both India and Pakistan employ social media to shape narratives during conflicts. Pakistan’s use of manipulated satellite imagery aligns with tactics documented by the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, which, in a May 12, 2025, report, identified similar patterns of fabricated evidence during the 2021 India-China border tensions. India’s response, leveraging high-visibility imagery and Modi’s personal presence, reflects a sophisticated counter-disinformation strategy. The World Association of News Publishers, in its 2025 global media trends report, underscores the growing importance of visual verification in combating false narratives, citing Modi’s Adampur photographs as a case study.
Geopolitically, the incident highlights the precarious balance of power between India and Pakistan, both nuclear-armed states with a history of conflict. The International Crisis Group, in its May 2025 South Asia briefing, warns that escalatory rhetoric and disinformation risk miscalculations, particularly in the context of Pakistan’s economic fragility, as evidenced by its $131 billion external debt reported by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in April 2025. India’s robust economic growth, projected at 6.8% for 2025 by the Asian Development Bank, contrasts with Pakistan’s 2.4% growth forecast, amplifying the asymmetry in their military and informational capabilities. The S-400, as a symbol of India’s technological edge, exacerbates Pakistan’s strategic anxieties, as noted by the Center for Naval Analyses in a May 2025 report on South Asian deterrence dynamics.
The Adampur visit also served domestic political purposes. The Indian Ministry of Defence’s 2025 budget, allocating $75 billion for modernization, reflects India’s prioritization of advanced systems like the S-400, as detailed in a March 2025 report by the Observer Research Foundation. Modi’s presence at Adampur, coupled with his speech emphasizing Operation Sindoor’s success, reported by NDTV on May 13, 2025, bolstered domestic support for his government’s defense policies. The Brookings Institution, in a May 2025 analysis, notes that such high-profile visits are strategic tools for consolidating national unity in times of crisis, particularly in India’s polarized political landscape.
Technologically, the S-400’s resilience against Pakistan’s alleged hypersonic missile strikes merits scrutiny. The Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, in a 2024 technical brief, questions the JF-17’s capacity to deliver hypersonic payloads, given its reliance on subsonic munitions. Pakistan’s Fatah-II, while advanced, lacks the precision to target heavily defended assets like the S-400, according to a 2025 RAND Corporation report on missile defense vulnerabilities. The Indian Air Force’s integration of electronic countermeasures, detailed in a 2024 DRDO technical paper, likely enhanced the S-400’s survivability, further debunking Pakistan’s claims.
The broader implications of this episode extend to the role of great powers in South Asian conflicts. Russia, as the S-400’s supplier, issued a statement on May 14, 2025, through TASS, affirming the system’s reliability and dismissing Pakistan’s claims as baseless. The United States, while neutral, emphasized de-escalation in a May 13, 2025, State Department briefing, reflecting its cautious approach to India-Pakistan tensions, as analyzed by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. China, Pakistan’s primary ally, remained silent, possibly due to its own S-400 deployments, as noted by SIPRI’s 2025 arms trade register, which complicates its response to the narrative.
In conclusion, the Adampur visit and the S-400 controversy encapsulate the intersection of technology, disinformation, and geopolitics in the 2025 India-Pakistan conflict. India’s strategic use of visual evidence, backed by the S-400’s proven capabilities, not only refuted Pakistan’s claims but also reinforced its deterrence posture. The episode underscores the need for robust verification mechanisms in an era of hybrid warfare, where disinformation can escalate tensions as effectively as kinetic actions. As South Asia navigates its complex security landscape, the interplay of advanced defense systems, strategic communication, and economic disparities will continue to shape the region’s stability, with global implications for nuclear deterrence and regional power dynamics.
| Category | Details | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Incident Overview | On May 10, 2025, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) claimed its JF-17 Thunder jets and Fatah-II missiles struck Adampur Air Force Station in Punjab, India, destroying the S-400 air defense system, runway, radar, and aircraft, with 60 personnel killed. India denied these claims, asserting the base and S-400 remained operational. On May 13, 2025, Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Adampur, with photographs showing the intact S-400 and MiG-29, debunking Pakistan’s narrative. | Press Information Bureau (PIB), May 13, 2025; Reuters, May 13, 2025; BBC, May 13, 2025 |
| S-400 System Specifications | The S-400 Triumf, developed by Russia’s Almaz-Antey, is a long-range surface-to-air missile system with a 400-km range and 30-km altitude capability. It features the 91N6E Big Bird radar, tracking up to 100 targets with 360-degree coverage. India acquired five regiments for $5.43 billion in 2018, with deliveries starting in 2021. Deployed at Adampur, 80 km from Pakistan, it counters missiles, drones, and aircraft. | Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), 2022 Arms Transfer Database; International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), 2023 Technical Assessment; Ministry of Defence, India, 2024 Annual Report |
| Operation Sindoor Context | Operation Sindoor, launched on May 7, 2025, was India’s response to a terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, on April 22, 2025. Indian forces struck nine high-value terrorist targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), killing over 100 terrorists. The operation involved precise missile and drone strikes, with the S-400 neutralizing 92% of Pakistan’s retaliatory drones and missiles over May 8-11, 2025. | Indian Army Press Briefing, May 12, 2025; Janes Defence Weekly, May 12, 2025; Hindustan Times, May 13, 2025 |
| Pakistan’s Disinformation Campaign | Pakistan’s ISPR claimed on May 10, 2025, that its JF-17 jets and Fatah-II missiles destroyed Adampur’s infrastructure, supported by manipulated satellite imagery. The Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) analyzed Planet Labs imagery on May 11, 2025, confirming no damage to Adampur. Pakistan’s claims included 60 deaths and destroyed jets, unverified by independent sources. This aligns with historical disinformation tactics, as seen in the 2019 Balakot airstrike. | CSIS, May 11, 2025; World Bank, 2025 South Asia Security Brief; Atlantic Council Digital Forensic Research Lab, May 12, 2025 |
| Modi’s Adampur Visit | On May 13, 2025, Modi visited Adampur, interacting with air force personnel and delivering a speech broadcast at 3:30 PM. Photographs showed the S-400 and MiG-29 intact, countering Pakistan’s claims. Modi emphasized India’s resilience, stating, “Our drones, our missiles gave sleepless nights to Pakistan.” The visit boosted troop morale and served as a strategic counter-disinformation move. | PIB, May 13, 2025; NDTV, May 13, 2025; India Today, May 13, 2025 |
| India’s Air Defense Network | The S-400 integrates with India’s multi-layered defense, including Akash and Barak-8 systems. The Akash, developed by DRDO, has a 25-km range, while Barak-8, co-developed with Israel, targets medium-range threats. The S-400’s electronic countermeasures enhanced survivability against Pakistan’s attacks. During Operation Sindoor, it intercepted 300-400 drones and missiles, protecting bases like Adampur, Avantipur, and Pathankot. | IISS, 2024 Military Balance; DRDO Technical Paper, 2024; Janes Defence Weekly, May 12, 2025 |
| Pakistan’s Military Capabilities | Pakistan’s JF-17 Thunder, co-developed with China, lacks hypersonic missile capabilities, as per the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance (2024). The Fatah-II, a 400-km-range rocket, was deployed in 2024 but lacks precision for hardened targets like the S-400. Pakistan targeted 26 Indian sites on May 9, 2025, using 300-400 drones and missiles, but most were neutralized. | Pakistan Army Website, 2024; RAND Corporation, 2025; Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, 2024 |
| Disinformation and Hybrid Warfare | Pakistan’s manipulated imagery and claims reflect hybrid warfare tactics. The Oxford Internet Institute (2025) notes both nations use social media for propaganda. India’s PIB flagged fake advisories and videos post-Operation Sindoor. The Atlantic Council (May 12, 2025) identified recycled imagery from past incidents. Modi’s photographs countered this, aligning with the World Association of News Publishers’ 2025 report on visual verification. | Oxford Internet Institute, 2025; Atlantic Council, May 12, 2025; World Association of News Publishers, 2025 |
| Geopolitical Implications | The incident highlights India-Pakistan power asymmetry. India’s 6.8% GDP growth (2025, Asian Development Bank) contrasts with Pakistan’s 2.4% and $131 billion external debt (IMF, April 2025). The International Crisis Group (May 2025) warns of escalation risks. Russia affirmed the S-400’s reliability (TASS, May 14, 2025), while the U.S. urged de-escalation (State Department, May 13, 2025). China’s silence reflects its S-400 deployments (SIPRI, 2025). | Asian Development Bank, 2025; IMF, April 2025; International Crisis Group, May 2025; TASS, May 14, 2025; SIPRI, 2025 |
| Economic Disparities | India’s $75 billion defense budget (2025, Observer Research Foundation) supports modernization, including the S-400. Pakistan’s economic constraints limit its military upgrades, with a $131 billion external debt (IMF, April 2025). India’s economy, over 10 times larger than Pakistan’s, enhances its strategic edge, as noted by the Brookings Institution (May 2025). | Observer Research Foundation, March 2025; IMF, April 2025; Brookings Institution, May 2025 |
| Domestic Political Impact | Modi’s visit and speech at Adampur bolstered domestic support for his defense policies. The Brookings Institution (May 2025) notes such visits unify India’s polarized polity. Modi’s rhetoric, including “Hum ghar mein ghus kar maarenge” (We will strike inside their homes), reinforced a strong anti-terror stance, resonating with public sentiment post-Pahalgam attack. | Brookings Institution, May 2025; India TV, May 13, 2025 |
| International Reactions | The U.S. praised the ceasefire but urged restraint (State Department, May 13, 2025). Qatar called for diplomatic resolution (Ministry of Foreign Affairs, May 8, 2025). China and Greece supported an international investigation (Security Council Report, May 5, 2025). The UNMOGIP’s role in monitoring the Line of Control was noted, but modalities remain contested. | State Department, May 13, 2025; Security Council Report, May 5, 2025; Qatar Ministry of Foreign Affairs, May 8, 2025 |
| Nuclear Deterrence Dynamics | Both nations’ nuclear capabilities heighten risks. Modi dismissed Pakistan’s “nuclear blackmail” (NDTV, May 13, 2025). The Center for Naval Analyses (May 2025) notes the S-400 exacerbates Pakistan’s strategic anxieties, given India’s technological edge. The International Crisis Group (May 2025) warns of miscalculation risks in disinformation-fueled escalations. | Center for Naval Analyses, May 2025; International Crisis Group, May 2025; NDTV, May 13, 2025 |
Strategic Evolution of India-Pakistan Military Technologies in 2025: Precision Strike, Cyber Warfare and Emerging Innovations in South Asian Defense Dynamics
The 2025 India-Pakistan conflict, precipitated by a terrorist attack in Indian-administered Kashmir on April 22, 2025, has illuminated the sophisticated evolution of military technologies deployed by both nations, underscoring their strategic adaptations in precision strike, cyber warfare, and nascent innovations. This analysis delves into the intricate details of their respective attack and defense systems, emphasizing verifiable data from authoritative sources such as the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), and national defense reports. By exploring the technological underpinnings, operational doctrines, and future trajectories of these capabilities, this exposition aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how these systems shape South Asian security dynamics, with a focus on precision, resilience, and deterrence.
India’s offensive capabilities have undergone significant enhancement, driven by a $75 billion defense modernization budget in 2025, as outlined by the Observer Research Foundation in its March 2025 report. Central to this arsenal are the Rafale multirole fighters, acquired from France in a $9.4 billion deal for 36 jets, completed in 2020, according to SIPRI’s 2022 arms transfer database. These 4.5-generation aircraft, equipped with Meteor beyond-visual-range air-to-air missiles with a 150-kilometer range, demonstrated precision during Operation Sindoor, striking 70% of designated targets in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, as reported by the Indian Ministry of Defence on May 12, 2025. Complementing the Rafale is the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile, co-developed with Russia, with a 290-kilometer range and a speed of Mach 2.8. The BrahMos, deployed across 12 Indian Navy warships and 15 land-based launchers, executed 42 strikes during the May 8-11, 2025, engagements, achieving a 95% hit rate, per a Janes Defence Weekly analysis on May 13, 2025. India’s kamikaze drones, notably the Harop loitering munition from Israel Aerospace Industries, further augment its precision strike capacity. These drones, with a 1,000-kilometer range and 23-kilogram warhead, neutralized 18 Pakistani radar installations, as confirmed by the Indian Air Force’s operational summary on May 12, 2025.
Pakistan’s offensive systems, constrained by a $10.2 billion defense budget in 2025, as reported by the International Monetary Fund in April 2025, rely heavily on Chinese and Turkish collaborations. The JF-17 Thunder, co-developed with China’s Chengdu Aircraft Corporation, forms the backbone of Pakistan’s air force, with 150 units operational, per the IISS 2024 Military Balance. Equipped with PL-15 missiles, boasting a 200-kilometer range, the JF-17 conducted 27 sorties on May 9, 2025, targeting Indian border posts, though only 12% of strikes achieved confirmed hits, according to a Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) report on May 11, 2025. Pakistan’s Fatah-II guided rocket system, with a 400-kilometer range and 500-kilogram payload, was deployed in 2024, as noted by the Pakistan Army’s official website. During the conflict, 62 Fatah-II rockets were launched, with 19 intercepted by India’s defense systems, per a RAND Corporation analysis on May 13, 2025. Additionally, Pakistan’s acquisition of 25 Bayraktar TB2 drones from Turkey, each capable of carrying four MAM-L smart munitions, enabled 14 precision strikes on Indian supply lines, though 11 drones were downed, as reported by the Indian Ministry of Defence.
India’s defense architecture is anchored by a multi-layered air and missile defense network, integrating indigenous and foreign systems. The Akash missile system, developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), with a 25-kilometer range and 98% interception rate, neutralized 82 Pakistani drones during the conflict, per a DRDO technical brief on May 12, 2025. The Barak-8, co-developed with Israel, extends coverage to 100 kilometers and intercepted 15 Fatah-II rockets, as detailed in a Naval Technology report on May 13, 2025. India’s Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) program, comprising the Prithvi Air Defence (PAD) and Advanced Air Defence (AAD) systems, offers two-tier protection against ballistic missiles up to 2,000 kilometers, according to a 2024 DRDO white paper. During the conflict, the BMD system successfully intercepted three of four incoming ballistic missiles, as verified by the Indian Air Force. India’s high-frequency jamming systems, deployed on May 8, 2025, disrupted Pakistan’s Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals, degrading 65% of its precision-guided munitions, as noted by a Strategic Studies Institute report on May 10, 2025.
Pakistan’s air defense relies on a combination of Chinese and legacy systems. The HQ-9B, a Chinese-supplied surface-to-air missile system with a 200-kilometer range, intercepted 29 Indian drones, as claimed by Pakistan’s ISPR on May 9, 2025, though CSIS imagery analysis confirmed only 17 successful intercepts. The LY-80, another Chinese system, covers 65 kilometers and downed four Indian missiles, per a Pakistan Air Force statement on May 10, 2025. Pakistan’s radar network, including the Chinese YLC-18, provides early warning but lacks integration, reducing its efficacy by 30% compared to India’s AWACS-supported systems, according to a 2025 IISS comparative analysis. Pakistan’s cyber defense, bolstered by Chinese software, mitigated 12 Indian cyberattacks targeting its command-and-control systems, as reported by the Journal of Defence Studies on May 11, 2025.
Cyber warfare has emerged as a critical domain in the 2025 conflict. India’s Cyber Command, established in 2023, executed 47 offensive operations, compromising 22 Pakistani military servers, as detailed in a 2025 Sage Journals study on cyber preparedness. These attacks disrupted Pakistan’s drone navigation, causing 15% of its drone fleet to malfunction, per a CSIS report on May 12, 2025. Pakistan retaliated with 19 cyberattacks, targeting Indian defense logistics, but only three breached India’s firewalls, as noted by The Quint on May 10, 2025. Both nations’ cyber capabilities reflect a growing reliance on digital warfare, with India’s $1.2 billion cyber defense budget in 2025, per the Observer Research Foundation, outpacing Pakistan’s $300 million allocation, as reported by the IMF.
Emerging technologies are reshaping the strategic landscape. India’s DRDO is developing hypersonic missiles, with the BrahMos-II projected for deployment by 2028, capable of Mach 7 speeds, according to a 2025 DRDO roadmap. India’s quantum communication systems, tested in 2024, enhance secure military communications, reducing interception risks by 90%, per a Journal of Defence Technology report. Pakistan, in contrast, is investing in AI-driven autonomous drones, with a $200 million project with China to deploy 50 such units by 2027, as noted by the Pakistan Navy’s 2025 strategic outlook. These drones, equipped with facial recognition, aim to enhance targeting precision by 40%, though development lags, per a 2025 ORF analysis.
Global policy implications are profound. The United Nations Security Council, in its May 5, 2025, report, urged both nations to avoid targeting nuclear facilities, citing their 1988 bilateral agreement. The International Crisis Group, in its May 2025 brief, highlighted the risk of cyber and drone escalations triggering miscalculations, given India’s 180 nuclear warheads and Pakistan’s 170, as estimated by SIPRI’s 2025 nuclear inventory. The Asian Development Bank’s 2025 economic outlook projects India’s defense investments will sustain 6.8% GDP growth, while Pakistan’s economic constraints, with a 2.4% growth forecast and $131 billion external debt, limit its technological advancements, per the IMF’s April 2025 report. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, in a May 2025 analysis, notes that India’s technological superiority, driven by 20% higher R&D spending than Pakistan, strengthens its deterrence but risks escalating regional tensions.
The interplay of precision strike, cyber warfare, and emerging technologies in the 2025 conflict underscores the evolving nature of South Asian warfare. India’s integrated defense systems and robust economy provide a strategic edge, while Pakistan’s reliance on cost-effective drones and Chinese support seeks to offset disparities. As both nations advance toward hypersonic and autonomous systems, the global community must prioritize de-escalation mechanisms to mitigate the risks of technological escalation in this nuclear-armed region.
| Category | Details | Source |
|---|---|---|
| India’s Precision Strike Systems | Rafale fighters (36 units, $9.4 billion, 2020) with Meteor missiles (150-km range) struck 70% of targets in PoK. BrahMos missiles (290-km range, Mach 2.8) on 12 warships and 15 launchers executed 42 strikes with 95% accuracy. Harop drones (1,000-km range, 23-kg warhead) neutralized 18 radar installations. | SIPRI, 2022; Indian Ministry of Defence, May 12, 2025; Janes Defence Weekly, May 13, 2025 |
| Pakistan’s Offensive Capabilities | JF-17 Thunder (150 units) with PL-15 missiles (200-km range) conducted 27 sorties, 12% hit rate. Fatah-II rockets (400-km range, 500-kg payload) launched 62 units, 19 intercepted. Bayraktar TB2 drones (25 units) executed 14 strikes, 11 downed. | IISS, 2024 Military Balance; CSIS, May 11, 2025; RAND, May 13, 2025 |
| India’s Defense Systems | Akash (25-km range, 98% interception) downed 82 drones. Barak-8 (100-km range) intercepted 15 Fatah-II rockets. BMD (PAD/AAD) stopped 3 of 4 ballistic missiles. Jamming systems degraded 65% of Pakistan’s GNSS-guided munitions. | DRDO, May 12, 2025; Naval Technology, May 13, 2025; Strategic Studies Institute, May 10, 2025 |
| Pakistan’s Air Defense | HQ-9B (200-km range) intercepted 17 of 29 claimed Indian drones. LY-80 (65-km range) downed 4 missiles. YLC-18 radar network, 30% less effective than India’s AWACS-supported systems. | ISPR, May 9, 2025; CSIS, May 11, 2025; IISS, 2025 |
| Cyber Warfare Operations | India’s Cyber Command executed 47 operations, compromising 22 Pakistani servers, disrupting 15% of drones. Pakistan’s 19 cyberattacks breached 3 Indian firewalls. India’s $1.2 billion cyber budget vs. Pakistan’s $300 million. | Sage Journals, 2025; CSIS, May 12, 2025; The Quint, May 10, 2025 |
| Emerging Technologies | India’s BrahMos-II (Mach 7, 2028 deployment) and quantum communications (90% interception reduction). Pakistan’s AI-driven drones ($200 million, 2027) aim for 40% precision increase. | DRDO, 2025; Journal of Defence Technology, 2025; ORF, 2025 |
| Global Policy Context | UNSC urged nuclear facility protection (1988 agreement). India’s 180 warheads vs. Pakistan’s 170. India’s 6.8% GDP growth vs. Pakistan’s 2.4% and $131 billion debt. India’s 20% higher R&D spending. | UNSC, May 5, 2025; SIPRI, 2025; IMF, April 2025; Carnegie Endowment, May 2025 |
[…] Debunking Disinformation in the 2025 India-Pakistan Conflict: The Strategic Significance of… […]