We all know that alcohol impairs our judgement, alertness and performance on tasks requiring attention, but the mechanism behind booze’s effect on cognition still isn’t well-understood.
Now, a new study led by psychologists at San Diego State University sheds light on the question of why people feel like they are in complete control of their actions when they’re drinking even while their cognitive control is clearly impaired.
The results could help explain what goes on at the neural level when people who’ve been drinking decide they’re okay to drive.
In a recent study published in the journal PLOS ONE, a team led by psychologist Ksenija Marinkovic, director of SDSU’s Spatio-Temporal Brain Imaging Laboratory, recruited 18 young, healthy volunteers to participate in an experiment measuring their cognitive control while distracted.
The volunteers sat in a brain imaging machine called a MEG scanner and watched a series of colored squares appear on a screen.
First, two squares of the same color would appear on either side, followed by a single square flashing in the middle of the screen.
At times, the middle square’s color would match the two side squares and sometimes it would be different.
Participants were instructed to ignore the color of the side squares and press a button corresponding to the color of the middle square.
Even though the participants understood what they were supposed to do, it’s not easy to disregard the irrelevant side squares, which are known as flankers, explained study co-author Lauren Beaton, a graduate psychology student at SDSU.
“They unconsciously begin preparing to respond, as the flankers prematurely elicit automatic motor response before the actual target appears,” she said.
“To do this successfully requires recruitment of cognitive control. That means having the capacity to monitor attentional demands and respond to them flexibly.”
It’s a difficult enough task when sober, but the volunteers also took the task after consuming an alcoholic beverage, as well as during a placebo phase.
During all three conditions (sober, placebo and alcohol) the scientists used the imaging machine to measure brain waves known as beta and theta oscillations, which are waveforms produced by the brain’s electrical activity.
Theta waves are involved in communication between different regions of the brain during decision-making, while beta waves are involved in motor control and preparing for movement.
In the experiment, for example, theta waves reflect the brain deciding which button is the correct color to press, while beta waves reflect the brain’s preparing to send signals to the muscle.
The researchers found that after participants drank alcohol, their beta waves during the color-choosing task seemed perfectly normal—but their theta waves dropped sharply in frequency.
“At its peak, theta power under alcohol decreased to roughly half of placebo levels,” Beaton said.
After drinking, the volunteers’ accuracy at the color-choosing task also fell by about five percent whenever the flanker squares didn’t match the target square. Interestingly, reaction time stayed about the same.
Taken together, the results suggest “that alcohol primarily induces deficits during decision-making, and not while executing motor commands,” Beaton said.
In other words, the brain still thinks it’s making the right choices, even though its ability to do so is impaired.
That pernicious effect is especially troublesome for a task like driving, Beaton added.
“When driving, we usually operate on auto-pilot, going through the motions automatically and without much conscious thought,” she said. “However, occasionally we have to quickly react to stimuli, such as when a car cuts you off.
You must be able to override automaticity and use cognitive control to safely navigate the situation. But when drivers are intoxicated, they are less successful at making these quick changes.”
More information: Lauren E. Beaton et al. When the brain changes its mind: Oscillatory dynamics of conflict processing and response switching in a flanker task during alcohol challenge, PLOS ONE (2018). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191200
Journal reference: PLoS ONE search and more info website
Provided by: San Diego State University