Low levels of vitamin D during the first year of life are inversely associated with metabolic syndrome in adolescence – which is closely linked to obesity – according to a new University of Michigan study.
Metabolic syndrome is a group of conditions such as high blood sugar, excess body fat around the waist and abnormal cholesterol or triglyceride levels that together increase risk of heart disease, stroke and type 2 diabetes.
“We can never tell from an observational study if there is causation but at least from a predictive point of view, the fact that a single measure of vitamin D in early life predicts cardiovascular risk over such a long period is compelling,” said senior author Eduardo Villamor, professor of epidemiology at the U-M School of Public Health.
The study, published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, used data from more than 300 children from a cohort of about 1,800 participants recruited as infants.
The children from 50 low- and middle-income neighborhoods in Santiago, Chile, were followed through adolescence for a cardiovascular risk assessment.
Villamor and colleagues measured blood concentration of vitamin D at age 1 and examined its association with body mass index-for-age at ages 5, 10, and 16-17.
They also measured the percentage of fat and muscle mass and a metabolic syndrome score and its components (waist circumference, blood pressure, blood lipids, insulin resistance) at age 16-17.
They found that every extra unit of vitamin D in the blood of a 1-year-old was related to a slower gain in BMI between ages 1 and 5, a lower metabolic risk score at age 16-17 and less body fat and more muscle mass in adolescence.
Another important aspect of the study was that it was conducted at a time when early cardiovascular risk factors in Chilean children were on the rise, driven in part by the obesity epidemic in this Andean country.
“The fact that you can have 16-year-olds with high blood pressure, a poor lipid profile and insulin resistance is very sobering. Finding potentially modifiable factors that might modulate that risk could be valuable,” said Villamor, adding that more research is needed to examine the effects of vitamin D supplementation in early life on long-term cardiometabolic outcomes.
Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin that performs a key role in calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism 1.
In particular, vitamin D deficiency induced disorders such as rickets or osteomalacia are able to arrest normal growth and the development of infancy and childhood, and vitamin D has been currently known to influence the extraskeletomuscular system as well as the immune system 1,2.
Therefore, there has been a growing interest in vitamin D deficiency and its supplementation 1-3. Currently, previous reports that presented a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency of exclusively breastfed infants have aroused public opinions about how ggressive vitamin D supplement needs to be for breastfed infants 1, 4-8.
However there are not any generalized statistical data of vitamin D measurement in normal babies and few comparing studies of vitamin D level between breastfed and formula-fed groups, so it is difficult to give straight answers for vitamin D deficiency of breast-fed or formula milk fed infants and an efficient method of supplementation for them.
Recently, a large study in the United States (US) noticed that 9% of the pediatric population were vitamin D deficient and 61% were 25(OH)D insufficient 9.
In the case of East Asia, according to small-scale studies of Asian nations, 31.2% to 57.8% of Chinese adolescent girls, and 76% of Mongolian children were in a state of vitamin D insufficiency 10,11. In case of South Korea, there are few reports of vitamin D state of the pediatric population and measuring value of vitamin D, particularly of asymptomatic infants or children, except a recent report that presented 29.8% of Korean children under 2 years old for vitamin D deficiency 12,13.
But taking into account the sporadic reports of subclinical rickets, vitamin D deficiency and hypocalcemia induced seizure 14-16, it is necessary to investigate the probability of vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency of even healthy-looking infants.
Besides, when considering the geographical position at the middle latitudes, Mongolian race and cultural traits like swaddling clothes, known risk factors of rickets, pediatric population in South Korea are suggested to be regarded as a high risk group of vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency with constantly increasing breast milk feeding 1,8. Therefore we performed this study to determine the vitamin D state of normal Mongolian infants aged 1 to 6 months in Seongnam, South Korea (37N), and to identify the correlating factors with vitamin D deficiency using a questionnaire survey and analyzing data on laboratory findings.
Our study shows that there is a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency of infants aged 1 to 6 months in South Korea, especially exclusive breast milk feeding infants. Mean serum level of 25(OH)D in total subjects was 20.15±13.14 ng/mL, which is very close to the cut-off value for vitamin D deficiency.
The proportion of serum level of 25(OH)D <20 ng/mL among our subjects was 48.7% (57/117), and breastfed infants were revealed to be 47 persons, which amounted to 82.5% of the vitamin D deficient group in this study. These findings means there is a significant correlation between feeding pattern and vitamin D deficiency, in line with previous studies8,20-22).
Breastfed infants had lower level of serum 25(OH)D, on average, than formula milk feeding infants even if they were in the vitamin D sufficient group. However it was not true that formula milk feeding is sufficient to overcome the vitamin D deficiency.
Consistent with the previous researches, we found that the serum levels of 25(OH)D were lower in female than in male. But the reasons proposed by other studies, that boys tended to spend longer periods of time outdoors with less frequent use of sunscreen23-26), were not appropriate for our results.
Our subjects were 1 to 6 months aged infants, who live indoors all day long, regardless of sex27). In this situation, this difference between two sex was so notable that it needs to recognize other influencing factor in the following study.
Other demographic variables in this study, such as age, delivery mode, weight at birth and study, season at birth and study, and the presence of siblings and mother’s occupation during pregnancy, did not have any significance for vitamin D state. Although a previous study reported that the mean serum level of 25(OH)D was the lowest in spring for infants under 1 year old20,28), we did not find any significant differences among four seasons.
Our subjects were enough young to keep indoors all day long, irrespective of the season, so it is unlikely for specific seasonal change to be an influential factor. With regard to maternal age, our study showed a different tendency from previous reports29-31), in that the younger the maternal age, the more prevalent was breast milk feeding. Therefore it is natural that younger mother with breast milk feeding had a higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in our subjects. To prove a definite correlation between maternal age and vitamin D state, however, requires further large scaled studies.
We also found that serum 25(OH)D level had a positive relationship with serum calcium and phosphorus. Both of serum calcium and phosphorus were known to be sensitive to vitamin D deficiency, and especially a previous study presented that hypophosphatemia at vitamin D deficient state was related to muscle weakness of rachitic patients32).
Serum ALP generally tends to increase in infancy, therefore serum ALP was less effective to screen vitamin D deficiency in early infancy like our subjects, limited to 1-6 months age ,but seen as a sensitive marker of rickets1,3,33-36).
We examined two further evaluations for vitamin D deficient infants in our study, serum parathyroid hormone and wrist X-ray for checking secondary hyperparathyroidism and subclinical rickets. Several previous studies reported the association between vitamin D deficiency and abnormally increased parathyroid hormone level reading to bone loss34,37,38).
As a result, there was no more correlation with vitamin D deficiency in our study, but we assumed that it was from sample limitation, due to further agreement or following loss.
In the US, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has recommended a vitamin D supplement of 400 IU/day for both breast milk fed infants and nonbreast milk fed infants starting at infancy to childhood and adolescence, and Canada has required vitamin D fortification for milk products such as milk or butter1,8).
In South Korea, however, there has not been any public recommendation for vitamin D supplement for infancy, even no definite standard of vitamin D deficiency, and few statistical data of vitamin D at infancy exist13).
However South Korea is situated at midlatitude in the northern hemisphere, and in particular, the amount of sunlight changes seasonally. More and more Korean infants, children and adolescents, not just adults, now use sunscreen from spring to winter in recent years. Most importantly, breast feeding has been increased by many mothers with a belief that breast milk is a perfect nutrient for babies, and some are even pressured to breastfeed 39,40).
Moreover almost all babies tend to be kept indoors until 2 months and tend to be swaddled in clothes or blankets indoors due to old customs. These have resulted in interrupted exposure to the sunlight, the main source of vitamin D production in nature. Therefore many infants of South Korea are indicated to have a higher risk of vitamin D deficiency.
We believe that this study is the first research to provide the prevalent data of vitamin D deficiency of healthy infants before 6 months of age, and our study showed that the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among them was much higher than other countries (48.7%).
In this regard, we recommend to start the supplementation of vitamin D for infants, at least 400 IU/L which have been recommended by AAP and worldwidely1), and suggest it be considered for public policy. Vitamin D fortified milk products or foods also should be required.
However, our study also has several limitations. Firstly, almost all subjects have only been living in Seongnam city or Gyeonggi-do, in the middle part of South Korea; therefore the data cannot be assumed to be representative of the whole of South Korea.
Moreover Seongnam is a city that has a population of almost 1 million people, so we suggest further study subjective to a population of a broader area including rural regions for appropriate population survey.
Another limitation was that we did not consider poly-vitamin supplementation of lactating women or our infants. However almost poly-vitamin supplement is contained few dose of vitamin D below than vitamin D supplement, and may have insignificant effect on the vitamin D state of the subjects.
Finally, although our effort to sort out healthy infants, undiagnosed clinical problem may influence the vitamin D state of subjects. Also we could not collect data with following up. Therefore it should perform following studies after vitamin D supplements with more strict subject selection and more detailed standard of vitamin D deficiency.
In conclusion, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among infants for 1 to 6 months in South Korea is very high, especially breast fed infants and female. Despite formula feeding, some cases are deficient for vitamin D, so that means the requirement of vitamin D supplement for formula-fed infants.
There has been no policy for vitamin D fortification of any formulas or milk products in South Korea, and the foods containing vitamin D naturally, such as Atlantic herring or cod liver oil, are not common foods in South Korea, with the exception of shiitake mushrooms1). Consequently, we suggest vitamin D supplementation to infants of South Korea, both breast-fed and formula-fed.
We also found that female was a significant predictor of vitamin D deficiency.
A previous study recently presented a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency in Korean adolescents, particularly in girls41). It means that the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency will continue to pregnant women and lactating women.
Therefore it is very important to start vitamin D supplementation in infancy, in order to prevent vitamin D deficiency for all ages. For that purpose, public policy on vitamin D supplementation, publicity on the necessity of vitamin D supplementation, and vitamin D fortified foods will all be needed simultaneously. Further collection of data and further research is also warranted.
reference link : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3668201/
More information: Joshua Garfein et al. Vitamin D status in infancy and cardiometabolic health in adolescence, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2020). DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa273