Rapid olfactory decline during aging predicts dementia – Alzheimer’s


Though we often undervalue our ability to smell compared to our abilities to see and hear, our olfactory sense provides our brain with critical information, from detecting potential dangers like smoke to recognizing the sweet smell of baking cookies.

Researchers at the University of Chicago Medicine have discovered another reason to appreciate our sniffers. Not only can a decline in a person’s sense of smell over time predict their loss of cognitive function, it can foretell structural changes in regions of the brain important in Alzheimer’s disease and dementia.

The findings, based on a longitudinal study of 515 older adults published July 2 in Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, could lead to the development of smell-test screening to detect cognitive impairment earlier in patients.

“This study provides another clue to how a rapid decline in the sense of smell is a really good indicator of what’s going to end up structurally occurring in specific regions of the brain,” said senior author Jayant M. Pinto, MD, a professor of surgery at the University of Chicago and ENT specialist who studies olfactory and sinus disease.

It’s estimated more than 6 million Americans have Alzheimer’s disease, which is characterized by memory loss and other symptoms, such as mood changes and trouble completing everyday tasks. There is no cure for Alzheimer’s, but some medications can temporarily slow its symptoms.

Memory plays a critical role in our ability to recognize smells, and researchers have long known of a link between the sense of smell and dementia. The plaques and tangles that characterize tissue affected by Alzheimer’s disease often appear in olfactory and memory- associated areas before developing in other parts of the brain. It’s still unknown if this damage actually causes the decline in a person’s sense of smell.

Pinto and his team wanted to see whether it was possible to identify alterations in the brain that correlated with a person’s loss of smell and cognitive function over time.

“Our idea was that people with a rapidly declining sense of smell over time would be in worse shape –and more likely to have brain problems and even Alzheimer’s itself –than people who were slowly declining or maintaining a normal sense of smell,” said Rachel Pacyna, a rising fourth-year medical student at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine and lead author of the study.

The team tapped anonymized patient data from Rush University’s Memory and Aging Project (MAP), a study group begun in 1997 to research chronic conditions of aging and neurodegenerative disease such as Alzheimer’s disease. MAP participants are older adults living in retirement or senior housing communities in Northern Illinois and are tested annually for their ability to identify certain smells, for cognitive function and for signs of dementia, among other health parameters. Some participants also received an MRI scan.

The UChicago Medicine scientists found that a rapid decline in a person’s sense of smell during a period of normal cognition predicted multiple features of Alzheimer’s disease, including smaller gray matter volume in the areas of the brain related to smell and memory, worse cognition and higher risk of dementia in these older adults. In fact, the risk of sense of smell loss was similar to carrying the APOE-e4 gene, a known genetic risk factor for developing Alzheimer’s.

The changes were most noticeable in the primary olfactory regions, including the amygdala and entorhinal cortex, which is a major input to the hippocampus, a critical site in Alzheimer’s disease.

“We were able to show that the volume and shape of grey matter in olfactory and memory-associated areas of the brains of people with rapid decline in their sense of smell were smaller compared to people who had less severe olfactory decline,” said Pinto.

An autopsy is the gold standard for confirming whether someone had Alzheimer’s, and Pinto hopes to eventually extend these findings by examining brain tissue for markers of Alzheimer’s. The team also hopes to study the effectiveness of using smell tests in clinics—in ways similar to how vision and hearing tests are used—as a means of screening and tracking older adults for signs of early dementia, and to develop new treatments.

Smell tests are an inexpensive, easy-to-use tool that consists of a series of sticks that are similar in appearance to felt-tip pens. Each stick is infused with a distinct scent that individuals must identify from a set of four choices.

“If we could identify people in their 40s, 50s and 60s who are at higher risk early on, we could potentially have enough information to enroll them into clinical trials and develop better medications,” said Pacyna.

The study was limited in that participants received only one MRI scan, which meant the team lacked the data to pinpoint when structural changes in the brains began or how quickly brain regions shrunk.

“We have to take our study in the context of all of the risk factors that we know about Alzheimer’s, including the effects of diet and exercise,” said Pinto. “Sense of smell and change in the sense of smell should be one important component in the context of an array of factors that we believe affect the brain in health and ageing.

Also, because most MAP participants were white, additional research is needed to determine whether underrepresented populations are similarly affected. The team’s prior work showed marked disparities by race, with African Americans facing the most severe impairment in smell function.

Pinto’s previous studies have examined the sense of smell as an important marker for declining health in older adults. His 2014 paper revealed older adults with no sense of smell were three times more likely to die within five years—a better predictor of death than a diagnosis of lung disease, heart failure or cancer.

Other scientists who contributed to “Rapid olfactory decline during aging predicts dementia and GMV loss in AD brain regions” include Kristen Wroblewski, MS, in Public Health Sciences and Martha McClintock, Ph.D., the David Lee Shillinglaw Distinguished Service Professor Emerita, Departments of Psychology and Comparative Human Development of the University of Chicago, and Duke Han, Ph.D., Professor of Family Medicine, Neurology, Psychology and Gerontology of the University of Southern California.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease where olfactory disorders appear prematurely [1] and act as a precursor that precede the clinical phase of the illness It has been shown that low olfactory scores, associated with a lack of awareness of the disorder, are prognostic factors of mild cognitive impairment [2]. According to the DSM V (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), the cognitive deficit associated with AD can be mild (minor neurocognitive disorder) or patent (major neurocognitive disorder) [3].

The degenerative process underlying Alzheimer disease is characterized by the formation of amyloid plaques (Amyloïdopathy) and by the accumulation of neurofibrillary tangles (Tauopathy) [4]. These anatomical lesions are early observed in the transentorhinal and entorhinal regions of the temporal lobe [5] and progress to the limbic areas [6].

During the asymptomatic phase of AD, a gradual degeneration of the primary cortex occurs and then progresses to the hippocampus, the thalamus, the insula and the orbitofrontal cortex [7]. Olfactory disorders worsen as the disease progresses [2]. Early odour identification deficits have been identified [1] as a strong predictor of entry into AD.

Among olfactory disorders, difficulties in olfactory identification are an early marker of vulnerability [8], while the detection threshold remains relatively preserved in early stages of the disease [9]. This is related to an early damage of the entorhinal cortex, hippocampus and orbitofrontal cortex [10–13], with high-level tasks being affected while olfactory information, and thus olfactory threshold is not damaged in the early phase [14,15].

The olfactory identification task involved presenting a set of odors and offering a choice of four to five names for each odor. Scores on olfactory identification tests significantly distinguish Alzheimer’s patients from healthy control [10,11] and could even have a better predictive value than an episodic memory test among adults at risk of cognitive decline [16]. There is a strong correlation between the results of the olfactory identification tests and the cognitive tests [17–20].

Thus, the use of an olfactory test (OT) is recommended [21,22] in daily clinical practice without an isolated use.

It is, in fact, a very good candidate to be used as a marker of the disease in early detection tests [23]. This was demonstrated by Lafaille-Magnan et al. [24].

However, these scientific findings do not necessarily lead to a regular use of olfactory tests [25,26], which could be justified by their time-consuming nature and the lack of consensus on which tests should be used [27].

Many olfactory tests (OT) are available on the market. Some tests are taking into account the cultural dimensions of odors, which is an important aspect of olfactory identification [28], others are multicultural [27].

The best known are: the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) developed by Doty [29], including short versions [11] and culturally adapted to North American culture, the “Sniffin’ Sticks” test (Burghart Instruments, Wedel, Germany) [30] applicable to European study groups, and the ETOC (European Test of Olfactory Capabilities) which is cross-cultural [31]. All have been evaluated in populations with mild cognitive impairment [32]. They are very rarely used as an adjunct to the premature diagnosis of AD [33].

Olfactory testing in cognitive impairment is commonly performed by otorhinolaryngologists in daily clinical practice or by neurologists or psychiatrists in memory clinics [14,34].

A simple, accurate and inexpensive OT [35] that would minimize the cognitive load [17] is necessary and recommendations have been made to incorporate clinical, cultural and molecular aspects in a test, stipulating the use of odorants of a simple and reproducible molecular structure [27,36].

By taking into account these imperatives, we have created a new OT, the TODA (Computerized Olfactory Test for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease), which offers an optimized test through fully automated and computerized processing. This automatization provides reliable and reproductible evaluation [37], as well as time saving, as recommended [25].The soft-touch feel and lightweight design make the touch tablet ergonomic. 14 high-quality fragrances have been manufactured by perfume chemists from the city of Grasse. They were formulated by the Institute of Chemistry of the University of Nice Cote d’Azur.

We used the TODA during memory consultations in 5 different centers in France, and at the Centre of Excellence in Longevity of at RUISSS McGill in Quebec.

The objective of this study was to validate the effectiveness of TODA in mild AD.

Specifically, we aimed to:

  • Evaluate the convergence validity of the TODA by comparing scores obtained from the control population and the AD’s population in France and in Quebec.
  • Compare results between the control group and the AD group in France and in Quebec.
  • Find correlations between the scores obtained in the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)(38) and the scores with the TODA.

reference link : https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0265764

More information: Rapid olfactory decline during aging predicts dementia and GMV loss in AD brain regions, Alzheimer s & Dementia (2022). DOI: 10.1002/alz.12717


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Questo sito usa Akismet per ridurre lo spam. Scopri come i tuoi dati vengono elaborati.