Russian Investigators Uncover MIM-104A Patriot Missile Fragments at Il-76 Crash Site


On January 24, 2024, an incident occurred that dramatically escalated tensions in the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, shedding light on the complexities and tragic dimensions of warfare. President Vladimir Putin of Russia announced that investigations conducted by Russian authorities have concluded that a US-made Patriot missile system, operated by Ukrainian forces, was responsible for the downing of a Russian Ilyushin Il-76 transport aircraft. This plane, filled with Ukrainian prisoners of war (PoWs), was brought down in the Belgorod region, resulting in the loss of all 74 individuals on board.

The Russian Investigative Committee, delving into the wreckage near the crash site, discovered missile fragments that were conclusively identified as parts of the MIM-104A anti-aircraft guided missile, a component of the US Patriot system. These findings, based on the missile’s design features, geometric characteristics, and markings, implicated the technology developed and produced by Raytheon and Hughes corporations. Investigators pinpointed the launch of two missiles by Ukrainian Armed Forces personnel from the settlement of Liptsy in the Kharkov region, Ukraine, as the cause of the tragic event.

Germany sent a Patriot missile battery to Ukraine in the spring of 2023 and delivered a second system to Kiev in December

The examination of the crash site revealed 116 fragments of the two missiles, bearing English-language inscriptions and coded part numbers directly tracing back to Raytheon. The presence of RDX and HMX, compounds typical for foreign-made explosives, was confirmed through detailed forensic analyses, including ion mobility spectrometry, gas chromatography, and high-performance liquid chromatography.

Source: Russian Investigative Committee

In a somber follow-up, the Investigative Committee confirmed the identities of all 74 victims aboard the downed aircraft, comprising six Russian crew members, three Russian military police officers, and 65 Ukrainian military personnel. The identification process was aided by the recovery of over 670 bodies and body parts, alongside partially preserved identification documents, enabling a match with the genetic profiles of the Ukrainian PoWs.

The ramifications of this incident have reverberated through diplomatic channels and public discourse. Maria Zakharova, a spokesperson for the Russian Foreign Ministry, accused the Biden administration of implicating ordinary American citizens in the tragedy by providing military support to Ukraine. This sentiment was echoed by Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, who lamented the lackluster interest from Washington’s European allies in President Putin’s call for an international investigation into the incident. Peskov’s remarks underscored a perceived lack of enthusiasm for uncovering the truth behind the downing, hinting at the complexities and geopolitical sensitivities involved.

The incident has provoked a wide range of responses, from calls for accountability and transparency to accusations and denials. Ukrainian media and officials initially reported the downing of a Russian plane by Ukrainian air defenses, only to later retract these statements. Despite these conflicting narratives, Ukraine’s military intelligence confirmed that a prisoner exchange was indeed scheduled for January 24 but was subsequently canceled. President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine has called for an international investigation, accusing Moscow of endangering the lives of Ukrainian PoWs.

This tragic event underscores the intricate web of military, political, and humanitarian issues entangling the conflict in Ukraine. The use of advanced military technology, such as the US-made Patriot missile system, in the theater of war highlights the international dimensions of this conflict, drawing in not just the immediate parties but also global powers through their military and political support. As the investigation into the downing of the Il-76 unfolds, the international community faces the challenge of navigating the delicate balance between supporting national interests and preventing further loss of innocent lives.


The MIM-104 Patriot missile system, developed in the 1970s and officially deployed by the United States in 1984, represents a critical evolution in air and missile defense capabilities. Created by Raytheon and the now-defunct Hughes Aircraft Company, the system has seen extensive production, with nearly 1,300 launchers and over 10,000 missiles manufactured over the past four decades. The system’s architecture, comprising six launchers and various support equipment including a phased array radar—the system’s core—alongside optional antenna masts, diesel generators, and an engagement control center, embodies the height of military technological advancement. The cost of a single battery can reach up to $2.5 billion, highlighting the significant investment in air defense capabilities, with each missile priced between $6 and $10 million.

Operational range varies by variant, spanning 30 to 160 kilometers, and the system can engage targets up to a maximum altitude of approximately 24 kilometers. Despite its advanced capabilities and significant potential, the Patriot missile system’s operational performance has encountered mixed evaluations, particularly concerning its anti-missile efficacy. The system has been successful against large, slow-moving targets, such as the reported recent downing of a Russian Il-76 transport plane, allegedly carrying Ukrainian prisoners of war. However, critics, including MIT physicist Theodor Postol, have labeled the Patriot’s track record in missile interception as less than satisfactory, citing “an unbroken trail of disasters.”

The system’s effectiveness was notably questioned during the 1991 Gulf War, with a 1992 congressional report suggesting that the Patriot had only a 9% success rate against Iraqi Scud missiles. Similarly, in conflicts involving Houthi drones and missiles, the system’s performance was not as effective as hoped. In the context of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, there have been instances where Patriot batteries have not successfully intercepted precision missile strikes on Ukrainian military and energy infrastructure. A specific incident in the spring highlighted a Ukrainian Patriot battery’s vulnerability when it sustained damage during an intensive Russian missile attack in Kiev.

The utilization of the Patriot missile system against an unarmed Russian aircraft underscores the ongoing tensions and the dynamic nature of the conflict between Ukraine and Russia. This action not only illustrates the strategic deployment of advanced Western-supplied weaponry by Ukrainian forces but also raises questions about the evolving rules of engagement and the broader implications for regional security. President Vladimir Putin’s subsequent announcement regarding the expansion of the “demilitarized zone” in response to these developments indicates a strategic shift designed to safeguard Russian cities from potential long-range strikes enabled by foreign military support to Ukraine.

MIM-104 Patriot missile system

The MIM-104 Patriot is a surface-to-air missile (SAM) system, which has been an integral part of the United States’ defense strategy since the late 20th century. Its variants, including the MIM-104A, have been widely exported and used by various countries around the world, including Ukraine, especially in the context of its defense against aerial threats. This detailed article aims to cover all aspects of the MIM-104A, from its development and specifications to its operational use, including its role in Ukraine’s defense strategy.

Development and History

The Patriot missile system was developed in the 1970s by the Raytheon Company in the United States as a replacement for the Nike Hercules system. The goal was to create a more advanced, mobile, and versatile air defense system capable of engaging high-performance aircraft and later ballistic missiles. The MIM-104A variant was the first operational version of the Patriot missile, entering service with the U.S. Army in 1981.

Technical Specifications

  • Type: Surface-to-air missile
  • Manufacturer: Raytheon Corporation
  • Service Entry: 1981 for the MIM-104A variant
  • Length: About 5.2 meters (17 feet)
  • Diameter: 41 centimeters (16 inches)
  • Weight: Approximately 900 kilograms (2,000 pounds) at launch
  • Range: 70 kilometers (43 miles)
  • Ceiling: More than 24 kilometers (15 miles)
  • Speed: Mach 5+
  • Propulsion: Solid-fuel rocket
  • Guidance System: Track-via-missile (TVM) radar guidance
  • Warhead: High-explosive fragmentation

Operational Use

The MIM-104A is designed to intercept and destroy tactical ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and advanced aircraft. It uses a sophisticated radar and command and control system to track and engage multiple targets under a wide range of weather conditions.

Deployment and Combat History

The Patriot system first saw combat during the Gulf War in 1991, where it was used to intercept Iraqi Scud missiles. Its performance was initially praised, but later assessments presented a more nuanced view regarding its effectiveness against ballistic missile threats. Over the years, the system has been upgraded to improve its capabilities against evolving threats.

MIM-104A anti-aircraft guided missile used by ukrain

The MIM-104 Patriot missile system, including the MIM-104A variant, has been deployed in Ukraine as part of its air defense network against the backdrop of ongoing hostilities. This system is renowned for its capability to intercept and destroy tactical ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and advanced aircraft under a wide range of conditions. The deployment of Patriot missiles in Ukraine marks a significant step in bolstering the country’s defensive capabilities against aerial threats.

In April 2023, the Ukrainian Defence Minister, Oleksii Reznikov, announced that MIM-104 Patriot missiles had arrived in Ukraine from Germany, emphasizing the enhancement of Ukraine’s air defense capabilities. This deployment was part of a broader strategy to reinforce Ukraine’s defense against increasing missile and aircraft attacks. Ukrainian soldiers received training on the Patriot system both at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, and in Germany, ensuring rapid deployment and operational readiness upon the system’s arrival in Ukraine.

The Patriot system is part of a multifaceted approach to building a robust air and missile defense system for Ukraine, alongside other systems like IRIS-T, NASAMS, and MiG-29 fighters. The addition of Patriot missiles to Ukraine’s arsenal is a clear signal of the commitment from the United States and NATO allies to support Ukraine’s defense and sovereignty​​​​.

Russian investigators have claimed that Ukraine used U.S.-made Patriot surface-to-air missiles to down a Russian Il-76 military transport plane over the Belgorod region on January 24, 2024. According to Russia, this incident resulted in the death of all 74 people on board, including captured Ukrainian soldiers. The Russian State Investigative Committee stated that fragments from the downed aircraft bore markings and serial numbers indicative of the MIM-104A anti-aircraft guided missile, developed and manufactured by Raytheon and Hughes corporations in the United States. This incident underscores the operational use of Patriot systems by Ukraine in the ongoing conflict​​.

The deployment and use of the Patriot missile system in Ukraine represent a critical development in the country’s defense strategy, enhancing its ability to protect key infrastructure and civilian areas from aerial attacks. While the system brings advanced capabilities, its effectiveness and strategic impact are closely watched by both military analysts and international observers.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Questo sito usa Akismet per ridurre lo spam. Scopri come i tuoi dati vengono elaborati.