COVID-19: Aerosols are the super diffusion route


Singing indoors, unmasked can swiftly spread COVID-19 via microscopic airborne particles known as aerosols, confirms a new peer-reviewed study of a March choir rehearsal which became one of the nation’s first superspreading events.

“This study documents in great detail that the only plausible explanation for this superspreading event was transmission by aerosols. Shared air is important because you can be inhaling what someone else exhaled even if they are far away from you,” said Shelly Miller, lead author on the study and professor of mechanical engineering.

On March 10 in Skagit Valley, Washington, one person with mild symptoms of COVID-19 attended a 2.5-hour choir practice indoors.

In the weeks that followed, more than 50 other people from that rehearsal would contract the disease – almost everyone who attended – and two died.

Because participants had taken precautions to sanitize and avoid touching each other, scientists suspected that aerosol transmission, not larger drops spit into the air or infected surfaces, were the culprit.

The new paper, published this week in the journal Indoor Air, confirms it.

Members of the chorale were serious about their music and their health that day. They did not touch each other, touched few shared surfaces, propped doors open and used hand sanitizer.

Few people shared the same restroom as the infected person, and many who did not use any restroom got sick.

They did not, however, wear masks.

By interviewing the chorale through a representative about what happened that day and calculating the rate of infection based on the details of the rehearsal and what is known about the SARS-CoV-2 virus, researchers conclude that there simply were not enough opportunities for droplets and infected surfaces, known as fomites, to transmit the virus to the number of people who fell ill afterwards.

But poor ventilation in the indoor space led to a build-up of aerosols produced by the singers, and heat produced by the singers themselves mixed the air within the room.

There were also many singers present and the rehearsal was long.

“The inhalation of infectious respiratory aerosol from ‘shared air’ was the leading mode of transmission,” said Jose-Luis Jimenez, co-author of the study, professor of chemistry and fellow at the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES).

The researchers found that shortening the rehearsal time in the Skagit Valley event from 2.5 hours to 30 minutes would have dropped the rate of infection from 87% to 12%.

Wearing masks, improving ventilation, using portable air cleaners and rehearsing for half of the duration combined could have dropped the number of people infected down from 52 to only 5, in a subsequent analysis using a widely-available tool developed by Jimenez, Miller and colleagues based on the study.

This superspreading event happened early on in the pandemic, when there were no known cases in Skagit County.

Businesses were just starting to shut down in the U.S. and public health officials were just beginning to debate whether masks were necessary. Aerosols, floating pieces of bodily fluids much, much smaller than droplets that also can carry the novel coronavirus, could not be responsible for COVID-19, said the World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Wash your hands and stand six feet apart, they said.

But after hearing of the outbreak in Washington state, Miller wasn’t convinced.

“Singing is known to release high amounts of aerosol,” Miller said.

Since March, other choir superspreading events have also occurred in the Netherlands, Austria, Canada, Germany, England, South Korea, Spain and France.

The new study offers new insight into how those outbreaks occurred and what can be done to make future choral rehearsals safer.

The authors recommend conducting choral practices outdoors whenever possible during the COVID-19 pandemic, and carefully managing any indoor singing events, as singing can generate large amounts of aerosolized virus if any of the singers is infected.

Improved ventilation which draws in more outside air, and air cleaning, that removes virus-containing aerosols from the air, can be helpful to reducing the spread of airborne infections in any indoor space, but singing with masks and at distances more than 6 feet apart are very important as well.

Miller and her fellow researchers first submitted their results in June, but aerosols are still not being openly acknowledged by the WHO and CDC as an important route of transmission for SARS-CoV-2.

“The research adds to the overwhelming body of evidence that aerosol transmission is playing a major role in driving this pandemic and especially to superspreading events,” said Jimenez.

The recent pandemic of a novel infectious disease (coronavirus disease [COVID-19]) related to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (4) highlights the importance of understanding the generation and fate of the droplets created by coughing and sneezing and other aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs), so as to provide a scientific basis for various preventive measures used to limit the transmission of infection. This work has not previously been published or presented in abstract form.

Irritation of the mucous membranes of the nose or throat produces a deep inspiration followed by depression of the soft palate and palatine uvula with elevation of the back of the tongue that partially closes the passage to the mouth. Air bursts suddenly through the lungs with variable force, expelling mucus containing foreign particles or irritants from the nasal cavity.

Stimulation of sensory nerve fibers (branches of the vagus nerve) located in the ciliated epithelium of the upper airways and cardiac and esophageal branches from the diaphragm by infection, inflammation, or irritation provokes cough (5).

Afferent impulses from these sensory fibers travel to the medulla where they are coordinated in the cough center. The efferent pathway of the reflex arc involves impulses that travel from the cough center via the vagus, phrenic, and spinal motor nerves to the diaphragm, abdominal wall, and muscles (5).

Afferent inputs to the brain stem are also relayed to higher brain regions, where inputs are integrated in pontine, subcortical, and cortical nuclei (6). The motor and premotor cortical brain regions can voluntarily initiate a cough by descending pathways that may bypass brainstem integrative centers (7).

The cough maneuver includes an initial deep inhalation followed by a compression phase, in which contraction of the muscles of the chest wall, diaphragm, and abdominal wall along with closure of the glottis produces a rapid rise in intrathoracic pressure.

In the subsequent expiratory phase, the glottis suddenly opens, and the high intrathoracic pressure generated during compression promotes an initial high expiratory airflow (up to 12 L/s) that breaks up mucus into smaller droplets and is accompanied by the sound of coughing (8).

The interaction between gas flow and mucus in the airways could be modeled as two-phase gas–liquid flow, that is, the simultaneous transport of gas and liquid in the same tube (9).

Droplet formation in the respiratory tract probably occurs by three mechanisms (Figure 1). The first mechanism is the instability caused by the shear stress on the mucus–air interface by the high expiratory airflow generated during coughing, which dislodges mucus from the airways and breaks it up into smaller droplets.

Compression of the airways creates waves of mucus, and the shear stresses from the high airflow causes small droplets to break off from the crest of these waves. The thickness of the mucus layer, its viscoelastic properties, and surface tension at the mucus–air interface influence the critical air speed required to initiate the instability.

Such interfacial shearing has its peak within the trachea where airflow is the highest (10). Second, dynamic compression of the airways by high intrathoracic pressure makes them vibrate with their walls approximating each other. This compression squeezes and loosens mucus and promotes expulsion of foreign material from the airways.

Vibration of the vocal cords and vocalization also contribute to droplet generation (2, 3). The third mechanism probably operates during normal tidal breathing when shear forces provided by respiratory airflow are insufficient to induce instabilities, and respiratory droplet formation probably occurs by reopening of collapsed terminal airways at the beginning of inspiration (Figure 1) (10, 11).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is rccm.202004-1263PPf1.jpg
Figure 1.
Schematic showing the site of origin and mechanisms of droplet generation from the respiratory tract. Adapted by permission from Reference 10.

The content and size of droplets expelled by an infected person depend largely on their site of origin. The oral cavity produces larger droplets (∼100 μm in size) during speech and coughing, whereas smaller droplets (1 μm) originate in the bronchioles during normal breathing and the larynx during talking and coughing (Figure 1) (12–14).

The size of coughed droplets was reported to be between 0.62 and 15.9 μm (average mode size 8.35 μm) in one report (11), but the distribution of particle sizes could be altered by the presence of viral infections (15).

In several investigations, the number of droplets produced by various activities (coughing, sneezing, breathing, phonation, etc.) is very variable (16–18). By using a laser light scattering method, 1 minute of loud speaking was estimated to produce thousands of fluid droplets from the oral cavity per second; of these, at least 1,000 droplet nuclei contain virions, and under the conditions of the experiment, they could remain airborne for more than 8 minutes (19).

Notably, patients infected with influenza virus exhaled aerosol particles containing infectious viral particles more frequently after coughing than after a forceful exhalation (20). Individuals who produce much higher quantities of infectious aerosols may be more likely to spread infection and be responsible for the “super spreader effect” in which an individual is responsible for infecting an unusually large number of susceptible individuals (17, 21).

Other factors to consider in the spread of respiratory viral infections are the frequency of respiratory events, viral concentration in the exhaled fluid and its volume, and the duration of exposure to an infected individual (17).

Because breathing and speaking occur more frequently than coughs and sneezes, they could have an important role in transmission of viral infections, especially from asymptomatic infected individuals.

Larger droplets settle quickly, whereas small airborne droplet nuclei are transported over longer distances by airflow (22). The distance droplets traverse depends on how forcefully a person coughs or sneezes. Large respiratory droplets containing pathogens like influenza can travel approximately 6 feet when a sick person coughs or sneezes (23–25).

The aerosol expelled from the mouth during a cough emerges not as individual droplets but as a jet with a leading vortex (25) that has properties similar to those of a puff from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (26, 27) and can penetrate an impressive distance into the surrounding ambient air before finally dissipating (28).

Thus, emissions from coughs and sneezes contain droplets of various sizes suspended in a multiphase turbulent buoyant cloud (29). Turbulence sweeps around smaller particles, and eddies within the cloud resuspend the particles so that they settle more slowly, with some particles traveling more than 8 feet horizontally through the air (28, 29).

Moreover, smaller droplets could spray 13–20 feet vertically in the air, which is theoretically high enough to enter and travel through ceiling ventilation systems in some buildings (29).

Most droplet transmission likely occurs at close range because of dilution and inactivation of viruses over longer periods and greater distances. In respiratory exhalation flows, the large droplets between 60 and 100 μm in size are expected to completely evaporate before traveling 2 m (30).

These large droplets are carried farther away when they are expelled at high velocity, such as with coughs and sneezes. The time it takes particles to fall to the floor depends on their size; for example, particles 100 μm in diameter take about 10 seconds, whereas 10-μm–diameter particles are estimated to take 17 minutes to fall to the floor, and 1- to 3-μm–diameter particles could remain suspended almost indefinitely (31). Infectious droplets carried farther away by airflow from an air conditioner were suggested to have transmitted SARS-CoV-2 among diners at adjacent tables in a restaurant (32).

Airborne Transmission of Respiratory Viruses by Cough
Respiratory viruses transmit by multiple modes, including contact and by airborne transmission (Figure 2) (33). The SARS-CoV-2 virus primarily spreads by droplet transmission but has been reported in one experimental study to last for up to 4 hours on copper surfaces, 24 hours on cardboard, and 2–3 days on less porous surfaces such as plastic and stainless steel (34).

These contaminated surfaces could be a potential source of transmission to other individuals who touch the same object or surface and then touch their mouth, nose, or eyes. Indirect transmission, through contaminated objects in a shopping mall in China, was probably responsible for a cluster of cases of COVID-19 (35).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is rccm.202004-1263PPf2.jpg
Figure 2.
Illustration to show various routes of transmission. For contact transmission, an infected person can transfer virus-laden respiratory secretions by (A) direct physical contact or (B) indirectly. If an infected person sneezes or coughs and droplets deposit or if they have the virus on their hands from touching their face or blowing their nose and then touch an object or surface, then that object or surface serves as a repository for the contagion. When another individual touches the same object or surface that has the virus on it and then touches their mouth, nose, or eyes, the virus is transmitted to these mucosal surfaces. The most common mode of spread for respiratory viruses is via (C) respiratory droplet transmission. Virus-laden droplets (generated by coughing, sneezing, or talking) are propelled from an infected person directly onto the mucosal surfaces of a host. Respiratory droplets are larger and generally fall to the ground after traveling short distances. Transmission of infection can also occur indirectly after the infected droplets have deposited if a host touches the contaminated surface and then touches their face. (C) Airborne transmission occurs when virus-laden fine respiratory droplets remain viable in the environment and are inhaled by a susceptible individual. This transmission can occur either directly by inhalation of fine droplets expelled from (C) an infected person or (D) during aerosol-generating procedures on an infected individual. Larger droplets expelled by coughing or sneezing evaporate, and these smaller and drier droplet nuclei containing infective microorganisms (lower panel) remain suspended in air for extended periods. They have the potential to deposit in the lower respiratory tract after they are inhaled. Larger droplet nuclei that settle out from the air can potentially be resuspended after their size decreases from evaporation, in combination with an aerosol-generating activity such as making a bed or while doffing personal protective equipment.

Viral nucleic acids, and in some instances viable viruses, have been detected in environmental aerosols in healthcare settings (36–38). A rising plume of contaminated air, possibly owing to suction created by an exhaust fan, entered an air shaft and was thought to be responsible for an outbreak of SARS-CoV-1 in Hong Kong (39).

Some preliminary evidence supports airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus (40–42). Santarpia and colleagues collected air and surface samples from rooms of patients with COVID-19 and found viral RNA in the air both inside and outside the rooms and on ventilation grates (40).

Another study from Singapore (41) did not find SARS-CoV-2 in air samples in isolation rooms in an outbreak center. They reported the highest virus concentrations in toilet facilities and positive results from air outlet fans. Another investigation in Wuhan, the city at the epicenter of the original outbreak in China, also found low or undetectable airborne concentration of SARS-CoV-2 but recorded elevated airborne concentration of the virus inside mobile toilet facilities (42).

Interestingly, they reported higher concentration of airborne SARS-CoV-2 in initial samples from medical staff areas and proposed that the virus was aerosolized while doffing personal protective equipment (PPE) (42). Most environmental sampling studies reported detection of viral RNA, but few studies demonstrated a recovery of viable virus, which limits the interpretation for the risk of airborne transmission. SARS-CoV-2 virus particles were detected in the air for a median of about 2.7 hours under the conditions of one experiment that may not have accurately reflected droplet production by coughs and sneezes (34).

Current evidence does not establish effective spread of SARS-CoV-2 virus via airborne route between individuals.

At the time of writing, the World Health Organization’s opinion is that SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted by respiratory droplets and by contact, and the virus could become airborne during procedures or treatments that generate aerosols (43).

Mechanisms of Particle Deposition in the Respiratory Tract
The air we breathe contains particles of various sizes. After airborne virus particles are inhaled, the nose effectively filters inhaled larger particles. However, the oropharynx is not as effective a filter as the nose, and smaller particles have a high probability of penetrating into the lower respiratory tract (44, 45).

Therefore, mouth breathing increases the dose of respirable particles to the lung compared with nose breathing. Although the nose is an effective filter for most large particles, the optimal particle size that enables deposition in the respiratory tract is difficult to define precisely because of the changing diameter as droplets travel through air. Various cutoffs have been proposed, with some authors proposing a diameter ≤5 μm as a cutoff, but particles of ≤20 μm can desiccate to form droplet nuclei (46). In contrast, most particles >20 μm in diameter do not deposit in the lower respiratory tract (47).

The mass of the inhaled particles and their diameter and shape determines the rate at which they deposit onto airway surfaces (44, 45, 47).

The most important characteristics of particles are the geometric size (d) and density (ρ) because these characteristics determine the particle’s inertia and transport velocity. Spheres that have the same transport velocity exhibit the same aerodynamic behavior and similar deposition patterns in the lung.

Table 1 shows some commonly used terminology related to aerosol deposition in the respiratory tract, and Figure 3 shows the mechanisms involved in particle deposition in the respiratory tract (44).

Table 1.

Commonly Used Terminology to Describe Characteristics of Aerosols

Aerodynamic diameterADThe AD is the diameter of a fictitious sphere of unit density (1 g cm−3) that has the same gravitational (settling) velocity in the same gas as the actual particle.
AD = d (sg)1/2; where sg = ρparticle/ρwater.
For particles of unit density, the AD is the same as the physical diameter.
Mass median aerodynamic diameterMMADThe MMAD divides the aerosol size distribution in half by mass. It is the diameter at which half the mass of the aerosol particles is contained in particles with larger diameter and the other half in particles with smaller diameter.
Geometric SDGSDGSD is a measure of dispersion of particle sizes within an aerosol. The GSD is the ratio of the median diameter to the diameter at ±1 SD from the median diameter. In a cumulative distribution plot of the AD and mass of particles, the GSD is calculated as the ratio of the median diameter to the diameter at 15.9% of the probability scale, or the ratio of the diameter at 84.1% on the probability scale to the median diameter. Aerosols with GSD ≥ 1.22 are considered polydisperse.
An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is rccm.202004-1263PPf3.jpg
Figure 3.
Schematic showing mechanisms of deposition of inhaled particles in the lung. On entering the nasal or oral cavity, particles deposit by impaction, turbulent mixing, sedimentation, and Brownian motion depending on their size. Particles >5 μm in aerodynamic diameter are most likely to deposit by impaction in the oropharynx and be swallowed, whereas particles <5 μm have the greatest potential for lung deposition. Particles between 4 and 5 μm deposit primarily in the bronchial/conducting airways, whereas smaller particles remain suspended in the airstream and penetrate to the peripheral airways and alveoli. In the lung periphery, a significant reduction in airflow rate allows particles to deposit predominantly by sedimentation, with gravity causing them to “rain out” and deposit. Most particles between 0.1 and 1 μm diffuse by Brownian motion and deposit when they collide with the airway wall. The longer the residence time in the smaller, peripheral airways, the greater the deposition from sedimentation and Brownian motion processes. Inhaled particles that do not deposit are exhaled. Adapted by permission from Reference 80.

The physical characteristics of the particle (e.g., mass and shape), the gas flow in which the particle is transported, the patient’s breathing pattern, velocity provided to the particle (e.g., by a propellant), and the airway anatomy (especially the presence of airway obstruction) determine the location of particle deposition within the airway (44, 45, 47).

The inspiratory flow rate influences aerosol deposition, with slow, deep inspirations favoring deeper penetration in the lung and fast inspirations targeting the tracheobronchial region for deposition. Likewise, lung disease influences particle deposition, with higher deposition at the site of obstructed airways and reduced deposition in airways distal to the site of obstruction (44, 45).

Infection risk to the susceptible host caused by inhaled droplets depends on the quantity of the pathogen and on its site of deposition. The size of viruses varies from 0.02 to 0.3 μm, and that of bacteria from 0.5 to 10 μm in their naked form (2). During tidal breathing, virus particles may be contained in fine particles (48, 49).

Analysis of aerosol particles from human coughs found that 35% of the influenza RNA detected was contained in particles >4 μm in aerodynamic diameter, 23% in particles 1–4 μm, and 42% in particles <1 μm, such that much of the viral RNA was contained within respirable particles with the potential to deposit in the lungs (50).

The viral load within the droplets influences the probability of transmitting infection after inhalation. The probability of a droplet containing at least one virion depends on its initial hydrated volume. For COVID-19, the average virus RNA load in oral fluid has been estimated to be 7 × 106 copies/ml (51), but some patients may have a much higher titer (52).

With this level of infection, there is a ∼37% probability that a droplet measuring 50 μm in diameter before dehydration contains at least one virion (19, 51), and this probability is reduced 100-fold in droplets with a diameter of 10 μm. Although very few particles actually carry pathogens (3), the number of small particles far exceeds the number of larger-sized droplets.

In exhaled breath, which has smaller particles than those in coughs and sneezes, quantitative PCR found greater influenza copy numbers in the fine (<5 μm) fraction compared with the coarse (>5 μm) fraction (49). This observation suggests that the infectious dose of influenza via aerosol may be lower than that with large droplets because of the greater likelihood of fine particles to deposit in the lower respiratory tract (49).

Likewise, subjects infected with influenza expelled fine droplets (count median diameter, 0.57–0.71 μm; geometric SD, 1.54–1.83) with cough, and they produced a higher number of particles when they coughed compared with the same individuals after they recover from the infection and healthy subjects (53). Moreover, particles from infected persons contain viable virions (20, 49, 50).

Relative humidity of the indoor environment could alter the particle’s aerodynamic diameter, length of time airborne, and viability. Knight estimated that a 1.5-μm hygroscopic particle increases to 2.0 μm in diameter on passage through the nose and to 4.0 μm in the saturated air of the nasopharynx and the lung (54).

Microorganisms are hygroscopic, and growth in particle size within airways could increase their retention in the tertiary bronchioles and alveolar ducts. This change is especially significant for viral aerosols because they are highly infectious for the peripheral airways in the lung (54).

Other indoor environmental factors, besides relative humidity, that influence viral transmission include the temperature; ventilation; the size of the room; frequency of air exchanges; air turbulence; ultraviolet radiation (sunlight); inorganic and organic contents, such as mucus or saliva, to which the particles are attached; duration of exposure; the type of virus; and the use of disinfectants (17, 55–57).

Aerosol-Generating Procedures and Respiratory Tract Infections
As discussed above, dispersion effects of the virus in ambient air rely on the amount of virus production, particle size of patient-generated droplets, and the speed and distance of transportation (57).

AGPs such as intubation, bronchoscopy, physiotherapy, and suctioning generate potential infectious bioaerosols by provoking cough (58) and are associated with increased infection rates among employees working in health care (59). In contrast, AGPs such as oxygen therapy, use of humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), noninvasive ventilation (NIV), and manual ventilation via mask are less about “generating” bioaerosols and more about “dispersing” bioaerosols farther away from the patient (Figure 4). Notably, evidence linking AGPs to spread of viral infections among healthcare providers is limited by the low quality of the studies (58).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is rccm.202004-1263PPf4.jpg
Figure 4.
Illustration to show the difference between aerosol “generating” versus aerosol “dispersing” procedures. A shows that a small amount of aerosols generated during normal breathing travel short distances before evaporation. B shows a burst of aerosols generated during procedures that provoke coughing such as suctioning, intubation, or bronchoscopy. In C, administration of therapeutic aerosols by nebulizer, noninvasive ventilation, or use of high-flow nasal cannula could disperse aerosols from the patient as a jet to a greater distance.

Aerosol therapy significantly increases aerosol concentration in the patient’s vicinity (60, 61). Aerosols produced by medical aerosol generators do not contain pathogens unless the aerosol device is contaminated. Inhalers, including pressurized metered-dose inhalers, dry powder inhalers, or soft mist inhalers, have a low risk of contamination (62).

However, the range of medications available in inhalers is limited, and drugs such as antivirals, antibiotics, mucokinetics, and prostacyclins are only available as solutions that require nebulization. The risk of medical aerosols as an AGP is, therefore, largely attributable to risk of contamination of nebulizers.

Primarily, care providers handling medication and the device may contaminate nebulizers, but contamination from the patient and nebulizer design also play important roles. Small-volume jet or ultrasonic nebulizers that are open to and positioned below the gas pathway can be contaminated by the patient’s secretions or exhaled bioaerosols when they are directly connected to the patient interface (mouthpiece or endotracheal tube) (62).

In contrast, vibrating mesh nebulizers generate aerosols via mesh plates that separate the sealed medication reservoir from the patient interface. During nebulization, the aerosol derives from the fluid in the nebulizer chamber and does not carry patient-derived viral particles. In addition, residual drug remaining in jet or ultrasonic nebulizers at the end of treatment could act as a breeding environment for bacteria if the nebulizer remains in the circuit between treatments.

In simulation experiments that used smoke (an aerosol of solid particles <1 μm), in vitro studies found that HFNC and NIV dispersed exhaled air, as did other oxygen devices, including simple mask, venturi mask, and nonrebreather mask (63, 64).

A randomized, controlled, crossover study in ICU patients with bacterial pneumonia who were treated with an oxygen mask at 8.6 ± 2.2 L/min versus HFNC at 60 L/min and had settle plates placed 0.4 and 1.5 m away found that bacterial counts were similar in the room air sample with each device (65).

It is unclear, however, if the findings of this pragmatic study of bacterial transmission could be applied to transmission of viral infections. Personal observations (J.L.) of aerosol concentrations in the vicinity of patients with COVID-19 suggest that the masses of aerosols were not significantly different before and after HFNC use and were further reduced when a surgical mask was placed over the patient’s face.

A computational fluid dynamic simulation also reached similar conclusions (66). However, if the connection of nasal cannula is loose during HFNC (63), a vented mask is used during NIV (67), or there is a large leak via the mask during NIV or manual ventilation (68), the leaking port functions as a jet that may spray the exhaled gas with virus in the ambient air, resulting in a longer dispersion distance.

As such, using a tightly fitting nasal cannula (63) and placing a surgical mask over the patient’s face during HFNC (66) helps to reduce the dispersion distance of the exhaled aerosol. During NIV, vented masks should be avoided (67) and placement of a filter between a nonvented NIV mask and exhalation port or between the resuscitator bag and mask (68) is recommended for both NIV and manual resuscitators.

Prevention of Airborne Infection by Respiratory Viruses
Respiratory infection could be reduced or eliminated by interruptions of bioaerosol transmission in three phases: reducing the release of pathogen at the source, impeding pathogen transportation by air or by surface touch, and protecting susceptible persons. To reduce transmission of respiratory tract viruses:

Avoid procedures that irritate airways and provoke violent coughing or reduce the exposure to infectious aerosol. Rapid sequence intubation is preferable because bioaerosol production is reduced by inhibiting patients’ breathing efforts and coughing with neuromuscular blockade and deep sedation (69, 70).

If possible, caregivers should stay 6 feet away from infected patients, particularly when the patient is coughing or sneezing. Increasing air exchange frequency also helps reduce the bioaerosol concentration in the room air (65).

Institute barriers to filter virus or reduce virus dispersion, for example, by placing a filter at the exhalation port of the mechanical ventilator or connecting a filter to the oxygen mask (e.g., HiOx Oxygen mask [Novus Medical Inc] or Respan’s Tavish mask). With the filter placed on the exhalation port of the modified nonrebreather mask, the HiOx Oxygen mask reduced the visible plume of exhaled droplets (71).

In spontaneously breathing patients, placing a surgical mask on the patient’s face or using tissue to cover the mouth or nose, especially during coughing, sneezing, or talking, could reduce the dispersion distance (72) or virus load (73). Open systems with high-velocity gas flow, such as a vented NIV mask, should be avoided. Likewise, when invasive ventilation circuits need disconnection, such as changing an in-line suction catheter or switching ventilators, the endotracheal tube might be clamped and the ventilator turned off before disconnection.

Use PPE for caregivers. For infection control and prevention in healthcare settings, standard precautions such as hand hygiene, respiratory hygiene, and the use of PPE are universally recommended to reduce contact transmission. The strictest precautions are needed for infections that may spread through the airborne route, such as requiring infected patients to stay in a single negative-pressure airborne isolation infection room (74).

All healthcare providers and visitors who enter the patient’s room must wear a fit-tested N95 filtering respirator (38, 75, 76). Goggles/visors are also necessary for AGPs that require intimate contact (within 3 feet) with patients (76, 77). For AGPs that may generate a burst load of infectious droplets containing virus, such as intubation or bronchoscopy examination, powered air purification respirators, when available, are an alternative to N95 respirators (78).

In such situations, the CDC recommend that healthcare providers in the room should wear an N95 or higher-level respirator such as disposable filtering face piece respirators, powered air purification respirators, and elastomeric respirators, with eye protection, gloves, and a gown (74). Ideally, such procedures should take place in an airborne isolation infection room.

Droplet precautions, on the other hand, are less stringent. Infected patients should ideally be placed in single rooms, but it is acceptable to colocate patients infected by the same pathogen. Surgical masks are required when working within close distance with infected patients. However, special air-handling and ventilation in patient rooms are not recommended. PPE could be self-contaminated (42); virus positivity was found to be higher when PPE was worn for longer durations and after clinicians cared for many patients while wearing the same PPE (79). As such, special precautions are needed when removing PPE.

Coughs and sneezes create respiratory droplets of variable size that spread respiratory viral infections. Because these droplets are forcefully expelled, they are dispersed in the environment and can be inhaled by a susceptible host. Whereas most respiratory droplets are filtered by the nose or deposit in the oropharynx, the smaller droplet nuclei become suspended in room air and individuals farther away from the patient could inhale them.

These finer particles are carried by the airstream into the lungs, where their site of deposition depends on their size and shape and is governed by various mechanisms, including impaction, sedimentation, Brownian diffusion, turbulent mixing, interception, and electrostatic precipitation.

Various procedures and aerosol generators could also generate airborne particles. Methods for prevention of respiratory viral infections depend upon their propensity to be carried in respiratory droplets or as fine droplet nuclei (airborne transmission). The respiratory transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19 is mainly by respiratory droplets.

Respiratory transmission of this virus via aerosols has not been definitively established but is possible under certain circumstances. Appropriate protective measures are necessary to prevent SARS-CoV-2 virus transmission in various settings.

reference link :

More information: Marr et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by inhalation of respiratory aerosol in the Skagit Valley Chorale superspreading event. Indoor Air (2020).


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Questo sito usa Akismet per ridurre lo spam. Scopri come i tuoi dati vengono elaborati.