A Wyss Institute-led collaboration spanning four research labs and hundreds of miles has used the Institute’s organ-on-a-chip (Organ Chip) technology to identify the antimalarial drug amodiaquine as a potent inhibitor of infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.
The Organ Chip-based drug testing ecosystem established by the collaboration greatly streamlines the process of evaluating the safety and efficacy of existing drugs for new medical applications, and provides a proof-of-concept for the use of Organ Chips to rapidly repurpose existing drugs for new medical applications, including future pandemics. The research is reported in Nature Biomedical Engineering.
While many groups around the world have been testing existing drugs for efficacy against COVID-19 using cultured cells, it is well known that cells grown in a dish do not behave like the cells in a living human body, and many drugs that appear effective in lab studies do not work in patients.
The Wyss team examined eight existing drugs, including hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, that they and others had found were active against SARS-CoV-2 in conventional cell culture assays.
When tested in their more sophisticated microfluidic Lung Airway Chip, which had been infected with a pseudotyped SARS-CoV-2 virus, they found that most of these drugs, including hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, were not effective. However, another antimalarial drug, amodiaquine, was highly effective at preventing viral entry.
These results were then validated in cultured cells and in a small animal model of COVID-19 using infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus. Amodiaquine is now in clinical trials for COVID-19 at multiple sites in Africa, where this drug is inexpensive and widely available.
“The speed with which this team assembled, pivoted to COVID-19, and produced clinically significant results is astonishing,” said senior author and Wyss Institute Founding Director Don Ingber, M.D., Ph.D. “We started testing these compounds in February 2020, had data by March, and published a preprint in April.
Thanks to the openness and collaboration that the pandemic has sparked within the scientific community, our lead drug is now being tested in humans. It’s a powerful testament to Organ Chips’ ability to accelerate preclinical testing.”
From mysterious disease to lead compound in months
In the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic when little was known about the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus, efforts were made around the globe to identify existing drugs that could be repurposed to treat patients who were falling ill.
While early data performed on cells grown in lab dishes seemed to suggest that the antimalarial drugs chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine could treat the disease, later studies showed that they aren’t active against SARS-CoV-2 in animals or patients, and the quest for an effective oral therapeutic that can both treat and prevent COVID-19 continues.
Fortunately, the Wyss Institute had a ready-made solution to that problem. In a move that today seems prescient, more than three years ago the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) awarded funding to Ingber’s team to explore whether its human Organ Chip microfluidic culture technology, which faithfully mimics the function of human organs in vitro, could be used to confront potential biothreat challenges including pandemic respiratory viruses.
Two years into the project, the team was making steady progress using its lung Airway Chip to study drugs that could be repurposed to treat influenza virus infections. Then, in January 2020, first authors Longlong Si, Ph.D. and Haiqing Bai, Ph.D. heard about cases of what was being called a novel viral pneumonia in China.
“That caught a lot of scientists’ attention, because any new virus could become a global threat given how easily infections spread in today’s era of widespread international travel. We closely followed the updates because we thought that our Airway Chip model could provide an important tool for studying this virus,” said Si, a Wyss Technology Development Fellow and co-lead author. Once it became clear that people were falling ill due to the mysterious COVID-19 and not pneumonia, the team quickly shifted its focus to the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus.
The human Airway Chip that the Wyss team developed for these studies is a microfluidic device about the size of a USB memory stick that contains two parallel channels separated by a porous membrane. Human lung airway cells are grown in one channel that is perfused with air, while human blood vessel cells are grown in the other channel, which is perfused with liquid culture medium to mimic blood flow.
Cells grown in this device naturally differentiate into multiple airway-specific cell types in proportions that are similar to those in the human airway, and develop traits observed in living lungs such as cilia and the ability to produce and move mucus. Airway Chip cells also have higher levels of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor protein, which plays a central role in lung physiology and is used by SARS-CoV-2 to infect cells.
“Our biggest challenge in shifting our focus to SARS-CoV-2 was that we don’t have lab facilities with the necessary infrastructure to safely study dangerous pathogens. To get around that problem, we designed a SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus that expresses the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, so that we could identify drugs that interfere with the spike protein’s ability to bind to human lung cells’ ACE2 receptors,” said Bai, who is a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Wyss Institute and co-lead author.
“A secondary goal was to demonstrate that these types of studies could be carried out by other Organ Chip researchers who similarly have this technology, but lack access to lab facilities required to study highly infectious viruses.”
Armed with the pseudovirus that allowed them to study SARS-CoV-2 infection, the team first perfused the Airway Chips’ blood vessel channel with several approved drugs, including amodiaquine, toremifene, clomiphene, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, arbidol, verapamil, and amiodarone, all of which have exhibited activity against other related viruses in previous studies.
However, in contrast to static culture studies, they were able to perfuse the drug through the channels of the chip using a clinically relevant dose to mimic how the drug would be distributed to tissues in our bodies. After 24 hours they introduced SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus into the Airway Chips’ air channel to mimic infection by airborne viruses, like that in a cough or sneeze.
Only three of these drugs ⎯ amodiaquine, toremifene, and clomiphene ⎯ significantly prevented viral entry without producing cell damage in the Airway Chips. The most potent drug, amodiaquine, reduced infection by about 60%. The team also performed spectrometry measurements with the assistance of Steve Gygi, Ph.D.’s group at Harvard Medical School to assess how the drugs impacted the airway cells. These studies revealed that amodiaquine produced distinct and broader protein changes than the other antimalarial drugs.
The researchers had a lead drug candidate.
All hands on deck
Despite the promise of amodiaquine, the team still needed to demonstrate that it worked against the real infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus. With the help of a new COVID-19-focused grant from DARPA, Ingber teamed up with Matthew Frieman, Ph.D. at the University of Maryland School of Medicin and Benjamin tenOever, Ph.D. at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, both of whom already had biosafety labs set up to study infectious pathogens.
This collaboration created a drug discovery ecosystem that combines the human emulation capability of the Wyss Institute’s Organ Chips with Frieman’s and tenOever’s expertise in the interactions between viruses and their host cells. The Frieman lab tested amodiaquine and its active metabolite, desethylamodiaquine, against native SARS-CoV-2 via high-throughput assays in cells in vitro, and confirmed that the drug inhibited viral infection.
In parallel, the tenOever lab tested amodiaquine and hydroxychloroquine against native SARS-CoV-2 in a head-to-head comparison in a small animal COVID-19 model, and saw that prophylactic treatment with amodiaquine resulted in ~70% reduction in viral load upon exposure, while hydroxychloroquine was ineffective.
They also saw that amodiaquine prevented the transmission of the virus from sick to healthy animals more than 90% of the time, and that it was also effective in reducing viral load when administered after introduction of the virus. Thus, their results suggest that amodiaquine could work in both treatment and prevention modes.
“Seeing how beautifully amodiaquine inhibited infection in the Airway Chip was extremely exciting,” said Frieman. “And, the fact that it seems to work both before and after exposure to SARS-CoV-2 means that it could potentially be effective in a wide variety of settings.”
“This collaboration has allowed us to do things that we never would have had the resources to do otherwise, including recently setting up Organ Chips in our own lab so that we can now use them to study the interactions between infectious viruses and their hosts.
While we’re proud of what we’ve accomplished so far for COVID-19, we’re also looking forward to studying additional virus-host dynamics using the Organ Chips in the hopes that we’ll be able to prevent or address future pandemics,” said tenOever, who is a Professor of Microbiology.
A preprint of the amodiaquine results was published online on April 15, 2020, which generated buzz in the scientific community. It eventually caught the eye of Medicines for Malaria Venture, a leading product development partnership in antimalarial drug research.
These results, along with studies from several other groups, contributed to amodiaquine’s inclusion in a clinical trial in collaboration with the University of Witwatersrand in South Africa and Shin Poong Pharmaceutical in South Korea last fall.
A few months later, the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) added amodiaquine to the ANTICOV clinical trial for COVID-19, which spans 19 sites in over 13 different countries in Africa. Amodiaquine is oral, extremely inexpensive, and widely available in Africa. If proven effective in these clinical trials, it could provide a badly needed weapon against COVID-19 in low-resource nations where access to vaccines and expensive new therapeutics is limited.
Preparing for the next pandemic
While the identification of amodiaquine is a major boon in fighting COVID-19, the team already has their sights set on future pandemics. In addition to SARS-CoV-2, their recent publication details their success in finding drugs that could protect against or treat several strains of influenza virus.
“Thanks to our experience using this drug development pipeline to validate amodiaquine for COVID-19, we are now applying what we learned to influenza and other pandemic-causing pathogens,” said co-author Ken Carlson, Ph.D., a Lead Senior Staff Scientist who helps lead the Coronavirus Therapeutic Project Team at the Wyss Institute.
“This process has given us confidence that Organ Chips are predictive of what we see in more complex living models of viral infections, and helped harness the creative cauldron of the Wyss Institute to consolidate and strengthen our therapeutic discovery engine.”
In addition to influenza, the team is now exploring drugs that could be used against the new SARS-CoV-2 mutant strains, to suppress the dangerous “cytokine storm” that leads to many hospitalizations, and to relieve the symptoms of COVID-19 “long haulers.”
With Organ Chip technology in hand, we are now in a stronger position to confront future pandemics. — >DON INGBER
“The pandemic has really gelled the Wyss Institute’s Bioinspired Therapeutics development program, and linking up with the Frieman and tenOever labs has created a drug discovery and development pipeline that dramatically speeds up the whole process, quickly shepherding COVID-19 drugs through preclinical development to the point where they can be tested in humans.
With Organ Chip technology in hand, we are now in a stronger position to confront future pandemics,” said Ingber, who is also the Judah Folkman Professor of Vascular Biology at Harvard Medical School and Boston Children’s Hospital, and Professor of Bioengineering at the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.
Additional authors of the paper include Melissa Rodas, Wuji Cao, Crystal Oh, Mercy Soong, Atiq Nurani, Seong Min Kim, Danni Zhu, Girija Goyal, Rani Powers, and Roberto Plebiani from the Wyss Institute; former Wyss Institute members Kambez Benam, Sarah Gilpin, and Rachelle Prantil-Baun; Amanda Jiang from Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Rasmus Moller, Daisy Hoagland, Kohei Oishi, Shu Horiuchi, Skyler Uhl, Daniel Blanco-Melo, Tristan Jordan, Benjamin Nilsson-Payant, Ilona Golynker, and Justin Frere from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; James Logue, Robert Haupt, Marisa McGrath, and Stuart Weston from the University of Maryland School of Medicine; Tian Zhang and Steve Gygi from Harvard Medical School.
This research was supported by the NIH (NCATS 1-UG3-HL-141797-01 and NCATS 1-UH3-HL- 141797-01), DARPA (W911NF-12-2-0036 and W911NF-16-C-0050), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Marc Haas Foundation, and the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University.
INCREASED USE OF CHLOROQUINE TO TREAT COVID-19 AND ITS EFFECT ON MANAGEMENT OF MALARIA
It is important to state that the reason for the choice of ACTs to treat malaria is to slow down the development of resistance to the antimalarial drugs involved . The principle behind the combination is that, the fast-acting drug, which is the artemisinin, quickly reduces the parasite load whilst the slow acting, partner antimalarial, gradually mob up the residue parasites .
The potency of the ACTs is therefore dependent on the efficacy of both the artemisinin component and the partner drug. Therefore, reduced susceptibility of parasites to the partner drugs in the ACTs can potentiate the development of resistance to the artemisinin with time. Amodiaquine is a partner drug in one of the ACTs (artesunate-amodiaquine, AS-AQ).
This combination is one of the most popular choice of ACT for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria because of cost and ease of administration. Amodiaquine is also a partner in combined drugs used in the management of malaria in interventional preventive measures, recommended for specific high-risk groups in areas of high malaria transmission.
For instance, in 2013, WHO recommended the use of amodiaquine in combination with sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine (SP-AQ) for seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) in children at high risk areas. SMC is defined as ‘the intermittent administration of full treatment courses of an antimalarial medicine during the malaria season to prevent malarial illness with the objective of maintaining therapeutic antimalarial drug concentrations in the blood throughout the period of greatest malarial risk’.
This intervention has been shown to be effective, cost-effective, safe and feasible for preventing malaria among children younger than 5 years of age in areas with highly seasonal malaria transmission.
Amodiaquine is also used in combination with SP for intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) in some disease endemic countries. IPTp reduces maternal malaria episodes, placental, maternal and foetal anaemia, parasitaemia, low birth weight and neonatal mortality.
Increased use of chloroquine to manage COVID-19 is likely to trigger the development and emergence of strains of malaria parasites resistant to chloroquine. In addition to the mechanism of parasites resistance to chloroquine described above, there could be subsequent selection of additional changes in genes regulating P. falciparum response to chloroquine [23, 24]. Such situations will favour cross-resistance between chloroquine and amodiaquine, which is part of some ACTs and IPT in many disease endemic areas [23–25].
It can therefore be conjuncture that the indiscriminate and escalated use of chloroquine or it analogies to manage COVID-19 may impact negatively on amodiaquine efficacy due to structural similarities. Chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and amodiaquine are all derivatives of the drug classified as 4-aminoquinoline. 4-Aminoquinoline have an amino group at 4-position of the quinoline moiety. Amodiaquine differ from chloroquine by only a side chain (Fig. 1). Therefore, the possibility of cross resistance between chloroquine or its derivatives and amodiaquine is very high.
Indeed, there are numerous reports in literature indicating cross resistance between chloroquine and amodiaquine. Various in vitro parasite sensitivity assays attest to this: work carried out in India by AnupKumar, et al. , in Philippines by Smrkovski, et al. , in Senegal by Diawara, et al. , and in Colombia by Fall, et al. , in South America by Young  and in Gabon by Pradines, et al. .
It must however be noted that a significant positive correlation suggesting in vitro cross-resistance may not necessarily be predictive of cross-resistance in vivo. Nevertheless, information on in vitro cross-resistance of one compound to an existing antimalarial is important as it becomes a potential indicator of future resistance: a marker or an early warning sign of an emerging parasite resistance, especially when chemical structures of the compounds involved are similar.
Therefore, as the use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine increases, the possibility of amodiaquine losing it current potency due to the aforementioned phenomenon is eminent.
Such an occurrence may lead to increased failure of the AS-AQ combination and a more serious consequences on the IPT used for pregnant women and children (SP-AQ), especially in areas where the efficacy of SP is already weakened. Again, under such circumstances, the planned future use of chloroquine in the management of malaria in the manner previously described  is likely to be jeopardized.
All put together, it must be said that the escalated use of chloroquine and its derivatives to manage COVID-19 is likely to be problematic for the control of malaria using some of the existing control drugs schemes. Measures must therefore be put in place to monitor and control the use of chloroquine and its derivatives to manage COVID-19 to avert these expectancies. There is the need to continuously monitor the efficacy of amodiaquine in disease endemic settings where it is used.
reference link: https://academic.oup.com/tropej/article/67/1/fmaa089/6053724