More than 1,000 species (a taxonomical classification of bacteria) have been identified in the human gut, associated with different functions and positive or negative effects for the host. Importantly, evidence is accumulating on the impact of the microbiota on mood and behavior and in clinical studies, differences in microbiota composition between diseased and healthy cohorts have been described [1▪].
However, despite the apparent common findings among studies, such as increased abundance of potential pro-inflammatory and lower concentration of health-promoting bacteria, identifying a disease-specific microbial profile remains challenging. Nevertheless, the involvement of the gut microbiota in mental disease processes and the potential to modify the microbiota through external factors, makes microbiota-targeted interventions a promising avenue for the development of new therapeutic approaches.
A visual representation can be found in Fig.1.1. This review outlines the state of the literature and latest advances in the development of microbiota-targeted interventions for the management of mental health and psychiatric disorders and discusses the gaps in knowledge that need to be filled in order to include gut-targeted therapies into the care of patients.
Proposed microbiota-targeted interventions for mental health. Several microbiota-targeted interventions have been explored as potential approaches for mental health, including mood and anxiety disorders. These include psychobiotic supplements such as probiotics, prebiotics or synbiotics, as well as dietary approaches or fecal microbial transplants.
The World Health Organization has declared depression the single largest contributor to disability worldwide, yet currently available treatments are able to induce remission less than 50% of the time. At the same time, more and more data suggests a repeated link between diet quality, gut microbiota, and susceptibility to a variety of mental health ailments, independent from other risk factors. The nascent field of nutritional psychiatry acknowledges the sizable gap between our current treatments for mental health conditions and offers a hopeful other way: adjusting our diet.
This does not suggest that pharmaceutical or psychological interventions should be abandoned. Quite the opposite: mental health is multifactorial, and often requires multimodal therapy. The emergence of adjusting diet as a preventative strategy or possible intervention for depression, anxiety or other mental health disorders should not replace standard therapies.
Although our brain creates our emotional and intellectual experience, it can be helpful to remember that it is also an organ with needs for nourishment and care, just like our heart or our liver. The brain, too, is sensitive to its environment.
Scientists are beginning to learn that mental health disorders share an important underlying cause with many other more “somatic” diseases, such as heart disease or diabetes: systemic inflammation.
Links Between Inflammation in the Gut and Mental State
The paradigm of mental health disorders as inflammatory disease is still emerging but is gaining support. One recent human study showed that a spike in the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 in the CSF could produce depressive symptoms in men. Another study in patients with major depression found that higher depressive symptoms were associated both with higher circulating C-reactive protein (CRP), an inflammatory marker, and a lower abundance of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10. Additionally, immune-suppressing medications used to treat autoimmune conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease reduced depressive symptoms both in humans and in animal models.
It may not seem obvious, but the gut is actually the largest immune organ in the body. The surface area of the intestine (called the epithelium)—where our body interfaces with the outside world—could cover half a badminton court. Underneath that surface is a diverse network of immune cells, poised to sample the periphery and maintain order. Above the protective mucus layer that tops the epithelial surface sits the body’s largest collection of friendly (and occasionally unfriendly) microbes. The gut microbiota (as it is called) partners with us for important physiological functions including facilitating our metabolism, helping to reinforce the stability of the gut’s epithelial barrier, providing nourishment for the intestinal cells, and even producing neurotransmitters.
The gut microbiota is directly affected by the food we eat, as our food is ultimately its food. Our gut microbiota, in turn, affects our inflammatory state by breaking our food down into compounds that modify immune cells. So when we talk about diet, we are really talking about an entire downstream cascade of events which can manifest in poor health status when imbalanced. That imbalance can also affect our minds.
To date, several human studies have observed the reduced risk for depression in diets higher in fruits and vegetables, fish, whole grains and olive oil. People who suffer from diabetes, a strongly diet-influenced disease, are twice as likely to also suffer from depression, and also more likely to have anxiety. There is also a notable comorbidity between people who suffer from heart disease and depression. People treated for major depression using personalized dietary counseling and support were 4 times more likely to experience remission than a social support group alone (32% and 8% remission respectively). Moreover, transplanting the gut microbiota from depressed humans into rats was enough to produce depressive and anxiety-like behavior in the rodents, suggesting that the gut is an important bioreactor for mind-altering microbes.
Several specific nutritional components may have an important impact on the microbiota and the mind. It’s worth noting that a variety of dietary interventions for depression have not shown success, but of those that have, a common thread among many is the emphasis on fruits, vegetables, fiber, and whole grains. While somatic conditions like heart disease and diabetes each have clinically supported diets, it is not yet common practice to prescribe dietary intervention for mental health disorders.
For brevity’s sake, we are not able to entertain a comprehensive list of the nutrients that have been potentially linked to mental health, or to explore their role in a broader variety of mental health conditions. However, we will discuss several dietary components and the evidence that supports a possible role in promoting better mental health, especially with regard to depression and anxiety.
PROBIOTICS
Probiotics are defined as ’live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host’ [3]. The potential psychobiotic effect of probiotics has been studied extensively in the last decade, with the most studied strains being bifidobacteria or lactobacilli.
Additionally, there has been a move to using microbial consortia (multiple strains of probiotics) in order to improve efficacy or induce additive and synergistic effects. In healthy populations, reductions in stress, anxiety and depression after probiotic supplementation are repeatedly demonstrated [4▪,5,6,7▪].
In patient populations, recently improved clinical symptoms of depression were observed in an open labeled pilot study in depressed patients using the combination of Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 (CEREBIOME) [8,9] and a reduction in anxiety symptoms in a population with Generalized Anxiety Disorder was elicited through a multistrain probiotic containing B. longum, B. bifidum, B. lactis and L. acidophilus[10▪▪].
However, albeit promising results, randomized controlled trials in clinical populations remain scarce [11]. Additionally, it is important to note that studies using single [12] as well as multiple strains of probiotics do not always lead to the desired outcome [13]. Thus, establishing host factors that impact the personalized efficacy of probiotic supplementation, including habitual diet or baseline microbiota composition, will be important considerations for the development of future probiotic therapies.
Of similar importance is strain specificity, meaning that one probiotic strain might be efficacious for a specific subtype in the disease of interest [14▪]. Furthermore, combined approaches could become more important, as demonstrated in a combined dietary–probiotic approach leading to a greater reduction in anxiety symptoms compared to each intervention alone [15]. Together, due to the limited evidence available to-date, the use of probiotics as a stand-alone therapy for mood disorders remains unsupported and some of the positive findings observed in preclinical models are yet to be translated into clinical practice [16▪▪].
PREBIOTICS
Prebiotics are defined as ‘substrates that are selectively utilized by the host microorganisms conferring a healthy benefit’ [17]. In light of potential technical and pragmatic difficulties associated with probiotic approaches, such as ensuring the survival of the probiotic transiting through changing pH levels of the digestive tract, the inability of probiotics to colonize the colon in the long-term, and selection of appropriate strains, supporting the growth of the already resident beneficial bacteria presents an exciting alternative opportunity; however, overall prebiotic approaches in mental health remain less studied when compared to probiotic interventions and the limited and inconclusive data are available from human cohorts demonstrate the need for more well defined clinical cohort studies [18].
For example, in a cohort of healthy females a reduction in preclinical anxiety after a galactooligosaccharide (GOS) intervention was observed [19▪], whereas no effect on depressive symptoms was detected in a population with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) using the same prebiotic (GOS) [9]. Similar to probiotic interventions, future studies using prebiotics should also consider the impact of host factors, such as baseline microbiota composition [20▪▪], as well as dose and study duration, when evaluating the efficacy or prebiotics in supporting mental health.
It should also be mentioned that besides fermentable carbohydrates, other nutrients have been demonstrated to possess prebiotic properties, such as polyphenols or omega-3 fatty acids, with benefits to mental health and well-being. Polyphenol consumption, for example, has been linked to many health benefits, such as reduction in depressive symptoms, whereas eliciting concordant changes in the gut microbiota [21,22]. Similarly, omega-3 fatty acids have been proposed to restore a eubiotic state in pathological conditions by increasing bifidobacteria and decreasing enterobacteria [23▪], which could be associated with changes in behavior [24]. Thus, while much more investigations into the therapeutic effect are needed, these compounds might become available as microbiota-targeted interventions for mental health disorders.
SYNBIOTICS
Synbiotics, ‘a mixture comprising live microorganisms and substrate(s) selectively utilized by host microorganisms that confers a health benefit on the host’, are emerging as another approach to modulate the gut microbiota and influence mood and behavior. Although the concept of synbiotics was first described 25 years ago, investigations into using synbiotics in managing symptoms of psychiatric disease are still few.
Nevertheless, positive outcomes were reported in recent studies using synbiotic supplementation, demonstrating improvements in depression, stress and anxiety levels in specific populations, such as patients undergoing hemodialysis [25] or with coronary artery disease [26] as well as in professional athletes [27].
POSTBIOTICS AND MICROBIAL METABOLITES
Postbiotics and microbial metabolites have attracted interest as another potential gut-targeted intervention. Recently, postbiotics were defined as ‘preparations of inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confers a health benefit on the host’ [28▪]. Accordingly, postbiotics are deliberately inactivated microbial cells or cell components, which must be present with or without metabolites in order to be effective.
These health benefits could be mediated through alterations of the microbiota, enhancing of the intestinal barrier function, modulating of immune or metabolic responses or signaling via the nervous system [28▪]. Due to potential advantages regarding formulation, safety and regulation, the therapeutic use of postbiotics could become more and more available and open up new horizons in the treatment of psychiatric disorders; to-date, however, only a small of number of studies is available.
Recent data from animal models support the use of postbiotics as anxiolytic- or antidepressive agents [29] and in human populations, specifically heat-inactivated microbes have shown some benefits in reducing anxiety as well as improving in sleep disturbance in chronically stressed students [30].
Although purified microbial components and products such as short chain fatty acids (SCFA), peptides or exopolysaccharides do not qualify as postbiotics themselves, they can be present in postbiotic preparations [28▪]. Because microbial metabolites, produced from microbial degradation of food components, are one of the mechanisms suggested to underlie the microbiota-brain cross talk, there is also interest in administering these metabolites directly as therapeutic agents.
In this regard, data from animal models show promise, for example, in reducing behavioral deficits (depressive-like behavior) and stress responsiveness associated with psychosocial stress [31]. Other data from animal models have shown that administering microbial metabolites directly can elicit the same benefit for brain function as the diet itself [32▪▪,33]. Due to potential challenges in administering microbial products directly, data from human studies are limited.
In one recent study, SCFAs directly administered to the colon using specialized pH-dependent colon-delivery capsules attenuated cortisol response to psychosocial stress [34▪]. It should be noted, that microbial metabolites, such as SCFAs, have also been associated with detrimental effects in certain neurological diseases, including Autism Spectrum Disorder [35] or Parkinson’s Disease [36], indicating that further research is imperative to understand the use of microbial metabolites as gut-targeted intervention for psychiatric or mood disorders.
FECAL MICROBIAL TRANSPLANT
In light of the brain-modulating potential of the microbiota, the idea of transferring an entire microbial consortium to treat brain-disorders appears to be an exciting opportunity. Especially the potential of a long-lasting reconstructing of the existing ecosystem makes fecal microbial transplant (FMT) an appealing treatment approach for patients with psychiatric diseases and associated microbial imbalances. However, due to possible safety risks and other unknowns, studies investigating the efficacy of FMTs in psychiatric disorders are at very early stages. Data from animal models showing that FMT can be efficacious in reversing adverse behaviors and neuroinflammation and improve anxiety- and depression-like behavior [37▪,38] are establishing a promising basis for clinical trials.
However, most human studies to date have been small or case control studies [39]; only one larger human trial including 83 patients with inflammatory bowel disease and co-morbid self-reported depression reported significant improvements in fatigue after FMT [40▪▪]. Thus, insufficient data is currently available to support the use of FMT to treat psychiatric disease in clinical practice and many procedures, such as pretreatment (e.g., antibiotics), route of administration or choice of donors, need to be standardized in order to develop targeted FMT approaches.
WHOLE DIETARY INTERVENTIONS
The importance of diet in supporting mental health and cognitive function is increasingly recognized. Extensive observational data from large cohorts from a variety of different countries and cultures have linked dietary patterns (e.g., Mediterranean diet, Japanese diet) [41,42] and diet quality [43], including higher fiber [44] and fruit intake [45] to better mental health outcomes.
Due to both the established connection between the microbiota and brain and the profound effect of diet on microbiota composition, such as the association between long-term dietary patterns and anti-inflammatory properties of the gut microbiota [46▪▪], a feature that is often underlying mental health disorders, developing microbiota-targeted dietary interventions is of increasing interest in the scientific field and investigations into the potential benefits of healthy diets in mediating the microbiota–brain interaction are starting to emerge. In animal models, microbiota-dependent benefits of intermittent fasting [32▪▪] and a ketogenic diet have been documented [47].
In human cohorts, an 8-week nutrition education program focusing on microbiota-friendly foods decreased depression scores and increased self-rated health and subjected well-being score in an obese population in Japan [48]. Similarly, a 12-month Mediterranean diet program induced increases in microbial taxa that were associated with improved cognition and reduced risk of frailty and inflammation in elderly individuals in a large, multicountry study (Nutrition in Elderly People (NU-AGE) cohort) [49▪▪].
This sparse number of human cohort studies available makes it difficult to provide evidence-based recommendations for the use of specific diets in improving mental health or to treat some symptoms of disease [50,51]. Thus, future high-quality and large cohort studies are imperative to further our understanding of this promising field. Furthermore, the individualized responsiveness to dietary interventions will need to be further investigated in order to determine which diet an individual could benefit from the most. Thereby, various factors could determine an individual’s systemic response to the intervention, including microbiota composition [52,53]. Due to the bioavailability of some nutrients (such as dietary fiber and polyphenols) depending on the conversion by resident microbes, determining whether an individual’ s microbiota contains the enzymatic repertoire necessary to benefit from a certain diet will be an important consideration. Thus, with sequencing techniques becoming more readily available, including an individual’s microbial profile into the development of nutrition therapy might become a possibility.
FERMENTED FOODS
Although fermented foods have been consumed by humans for centuries, a recent surge in its popularity, due to the many health benefits associated with its consumption, has led to new investigations regarding its use as treatment approaches. Importantly, it has been proposed that the health benefits of fermented foods, ‘foods made through desired microbial growth and enzymatic conversions of food components’, could be associated with the presence of live microorganisms, prebiotics and potential microbial metabolites produced through the fermentation process [54▪].
Some convincing data is presented in the literature regarding the potential of fermented foods to affect microbiota-brain signaling, both from preclinical [55] and clinical studies [56–58]. Although no more recent clinical studies are available and generally interventional studies are sparse, these earlier trials suggest that fermented foods could modify brain activity, stress responses, mood, and anxiety. However, due to heterogeneity in population, small sample sizes, fermented food product used and outcomes measured, drawing any conclusions on the use of fermented foods in supporting mental health is difficult. Nevertheless, results hold promise and the potential of fermented foods to influence pathways underlying psychiatric diseases, such as the microbiota and immune system [59], make the use of fermented foods a promising candidate for gut-targeted intervention.
CONCLUSION
Interest in developing gut-target interventions for brain disorders has exploded with the discovery of the bidirectional signaling between the gut microbiota and the brain. A plethora of review articles is available, outlining the potential of using psychobiotics in the management of psychiatric disease; however, whereas many advances have been made in the field and the current state of the literature provides a promising outlook toward the use of microbiota-targeted interventions as adjuvant therapies for some diseases (such as depression), the likelihood of these therapies replacing pharmacological agents is still in the distant future and especially greater evidence from clinical populations is needed to conclusively provide evidence-based recommendations.
Thereby, several aspects are important to note when interpreting the current state of the literature and need to be addressed to further advance the field. The personalized nature of gut-targeted interventions is a critical consideration and factors determining responsiveness to an intervention (including availability of microbial enzymatic repertoire) will be essential for the advancement of these personalized approaches.
In individuals missing certain microbial functions, it may be that future nutritional interventions will combine dietary approaches with specifically designed probiotics in order for the intervention to be effective. Similarly, choosing the ‘right’ intervention, the dosage as well as duration of treatment needs to be considered. Probiotics often do not colonize the gut and thus do not become members of the gut community, which usually makes it necessary to continue to ingest probiotics. Prebiotics or diet, on the other hand, have the option to change the microbiota; however, whether the microbiota will go back to baseline after the intervention is stopped is to be determined. Thus, it is likely that most gut-targeted approaches will be life-long interventions.
Given that conventional pharmacological treatments might not work for everyone and the promising evidence available regarding the manipulation of the microbiota to elicit health benefits, make gut-targeted intervention an exciting treatment opportunity for patients suffering from psychiatric or psychological disorders. However, multiple unknowns continue to exist and large cohort studies with well defined populations, especially in heterogeneous diseases, and well defined and specific outcome measures are required to fill the huge research gap in the years to come.
reference link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654258/
