Neural Correlates of Olfactory Preferences: Unraveling the Complexities of Appetitive Odor Perception


Olfaction, the sense of smell, plays a critical role in guiding the behavior of many animals.

The ability to detect and discriminate various odors is essential for survival, aiding in the identification of food sources, potential mates, and environmental dangers. The link between olfactory perception and behavior is a subject of great scientific interest, as understanding how the brain processes odor information and translates it into behavioral responses sheds light on fundamental aspects of sensory processing and learning.

In this study, we delve into the intricate neural mechanisms underlying innate and acquired olfactory preferences, unraveling the spatiotemporal coding logic that governs these processes.

Neural Responses and Behavioral Relevance

The study begins by examining the neural responses elicited by different odorants. It is well-established that odors activate specific neural circuits in the olfactory system, with the antennal lobe serving as the first processing center.

However, the relationship between these neural responses and the behavioral relevance of the odorants remains complex. The researchers found that while the neural responses are patterned across activated neurons and over time, the overall behavioral significance of the odorant constrains the ensemble neural responses.

Odorants associated with positive appetitive preferences evoke overlapping neural responses both during odor presentation (ON responses) and after odor termination (OFF responses).

Similarly, odorants with negative or neutral preferences evoke distinct ON and OFF response clusters. This spatiotemporal organization of neural responses enables the prediction of innate behavioral responses using different subsets of neurons.

Associative Learning and Pavlovian Conditioning

The researchers then investigate how gustatory rewards can shape olfactory preferences through associative learning. They demonstrate that delivering rewards during specific epochs of neural responses leads to successful Pavlovian conditioning. Notably, odor-reward associations are effective for appetitive odorants, resulting in increased behavioral responses.

However, non-appetitive odorants do not generate successful associations but instead enhance responses to other appetitive odorants. Intriguingly, a linear model can map neural responses to behavioral dynamics and cross-associations, highlighting the underlying neural-behavioral relationships.

Complexity of Chemical-Odor-Behavior Mapping

To explore whether odor preferences can be directly predicted from chemical features, the researchers analyze chemical properties and appetitive preferences. Surprisingly, they find that chemical features do not correlate strongly with behavioral preferences. Chemically similar odorants may evoke divergent neural responses, while distinct chemicals can evoke similar preferences.

This non-linearity suggests that neural responses aim to generate appropriate behavioral outcomes rather than merely representing chemical features.

The chemical-odor-behavior mapping is a complex process that involves the interaction of many different factors, including:

  • The chemical composition of the odor molecule.
  • The olfactory receptors in the nose.
  • The brain’s olfactory cortex.
  • The animal’s behavior.

The chemical composition of the odor molecule is a major factor in determining its odor. Different odor molecules have different shapes and sizes, and these properties affect how they interact with the olfactory receptors in the nose. The olfactory receptors are proteins that bind to specific odor molecules. When an odor molecule binds to an olfactory receptor, it sends a signal to the brain’s olfactory cortex. The olfactory cortex then interprets this signal and creates an odor perception.

The brain’s olfactory cortex is also responsible for learning and associating odors with specific behaviors. For example, a dog may learn to associate the smell of food with the behavior of eating. This learning process can be influenced by a number of factors, including the animal’s genetics, its environment, and its experiences.

The animal’s behavior is also a factor in the chemical-odor-behavior mapping. For example, a moth may fly towards the smell of a flower because it knows that the flower contains nectar. The moth’s behavior is influenced by its internal state, such as its hunger level, and by the external environment, such as the presence of predators.

The chemical-odor-behavior mapping is a complex process that is still not fully understood. However, scientists are learning more about this process every day, and this knowledge is being used to develop new technologies, such as odor-based drug delivery systems and odor-based pest control methods.

Here are some additional factors that can contribute to the complexity of chemical-odor-behavior mapping:

  • The presence of other odors in the environment.
  • The animal’s age and sex.
  • The animal’s health status.
  • The animal’s learning history.
  • The animal’s current emotional state.

The chemical-odor-behavior mapping is a dynamic process that is constantly changing. The animal’s environment, its internal state, and its experiences can all affect how it responds to odors. This makes it difficult to predict how an animal will behave in response to a particular odor. However, by understanding the factors that influence the chemical-odor-behavior mapping, scientists can gain a better understanding of how animals interact with their environment.

Individual Neuron Encoding and Robustness

At the individual neuron level, a subset of projection neurons (PNs) exhibit strong correlations with overall innate odor preferences. While these neurons might offer a straightforward model for predicting behavioral outcomes, their responses are influenced by multiple factors, leading to unpredictability. The researchers propose that a more robust model involves a combinatorial readout of ensemble activity.

Generalization and Neural Network Models

The study explores how locusts’ appetitive preferences can generalize through associative conditioning. Generalization occurs asymmetrically, enhancing responses to untrained appetitive odorants. A neural network model reveals that specific features, including overlap in neural responses and plasticity in a subset of neurons activated by appetitive odors, contribute to this learning effect.

Spatiotemporal Coding Logic

The study’s findings culminate in a spatiotemporal coding logic that underlies both innate and acquired olfactory preferences. Neural responses are organized into low-dimensional manifolds, distinct for appetitive and non-appetitive odorants. These neural manifolds facilitate the prediction of behavioral responses and offer insights into associative learning mechanisms.


This comprehensive study provides novel insights into the neural underpinnings of olfactory preferences. By examining the interplay between neural responses, behavioral relevance, associative learning, and chemical properties, the researchers unravel the complexities of how the brain processes odors and generates appropriate behavioral outcomes.

The spatiotemporal coding logic unveiled in this study sheds light on the intricate mechanisms that guide innate and acquired olfactory preferences, offering a deeper understanding of sensory perception and learning processes.

reference link :


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Questo sito usa Akismet per ridurre lo spam. Scopri come i tuoi dati vengono elaborati.