Russia’s Latest Counter-Drone Interceptor: The Vogan-9SP


In the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the use of drones has been a significant factor, shaping the tactics and strategies on both sides. Amid this backdrop, Russia has unveiled a new counter-drone interceptor, the Vogan-9SP, developed by the Red Line company. This new system is designed specifically to combat the Ukrainian uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) that have posed substantial threats to Russian troops and equipment. The introduction of this technology aligns with a broader global trend where drones are increasingly being used to counter other drones.

Development and Unveiling

The Vogan-9SP was showcased at a conference in St. Petersburg focused on drone detection and countermeasures. According to a spokesman from Red Line, the interceptor’s engagement process begins with the detection of a hostile drone by radar. Once detected, the target is designated using a laser, and the Vogan-9SP, driven by a pusher-propeller, launches at an angle of 45 degrees on command from its operator. Capable of accelerating to approximately 124 mph, the drone continues its engagement semi-autonomously once it is near the target.

The exact method of final guidance is not entirely clear, but it is suggested that the Vogan-9SP may lock onto the target optically in the terminal phase. This hybrid concept, combining laser designation with optical locking, is somewhat novel in the counter-drone domain, though laser designation to guide interceptors is an established capability.

Operational Capabilities

The Vogan-9SP reportedly retains a ‘man in the loop’ approach, with a video camera transmitting live footage of the engagement to the operator on the ground. The operator is also responsible for triggering the explosive warhead in the drone’s nose. This dual mode of operation, combining manual and semi-autonomous guidance, provides flexibility in different combat scenarios.

While there is some skepticism about whether the Vogan-9SP is a fully developed piece of hardware or still in the prototype phase, the concept behind the system is gaining traction due to the increasing need for effective counter-drone measures in modern warfare.

The Need for Counter-Drone Solutions

The proliferation of drones for surveillance, targeting, and direct attacks has driven the development of counter-drone technologies worldwide. In Russia, the need for such systems has become critical, given the extensive use of drones by Ukrainian forces. Current counter-drone measures include electronic warfare systems that jam drone signals, anti-aircraft artillery, and machine guns. However, these methods have limitations, particularly against smaller, low-flying drones that can evade traditional air defense systems.

Russia’s Counter-Drone Efforts

Russia has seen success with electronic warfare systems against Ukrainian drones, especially the more vulnerable first-person view (FPV) types. These systems range from vehicle-mounted jammers to handheld anti-drone guns. However, the gaps left by electronic warfare have underscored the need for kinetic solutions like the Vogan-9SP.

The introduction of the Vogan-9SP is intended to provide an additional layer of defense. Its ability to loiter over a designated area makes it particularly useful for maintaining coverage and engaging threats as they appear. This capability is crucial for protecting troops and equipment in dynamic battlefield conditions.

Parallels with Ukrainian Developments

The Vogan-9SP’s development closely parallels efforts in Ukraine to enhance its counter-drone capabilities. This correlation is not merely coincidental but indicative of a broader trend in modern warfare where both state and non-state actors increasingly rely on drones for surveillance, reconnaissance, and combat operations. In April, Ukrainian Minister of Digital Transformation Mykhailo Fedorov announced a significant project aimed at developing a counter-drone interceptor. This initiative sought to create a cost-effective alternative to traditional surface-to-air missiles for targeting Russian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).

Ukrainian Counter-Drone Initiatives

Ukraine’s initiative in developing counter-drone technology gained momentum rapidly. By June, Ukrainian-developed drones had begun intercepting Russian reconnaissance UAVs, as evidenced by video footage released by Ukraine’s Border Guards. These developments underscore the increasing importance of drones in the conflict and the urgent need for effective countermeasures. The project not only aimed to provide a cheaper solution compared to surface-to-air missiles but also sought to enhance the precision and reliability of these counter-drone systems.

The Ukrainian conflict has essentially become a live testing ground for various counter-drone technologies. Both Ukrainian and Russian forces are continually striving to outpace each other’s advancements, leading to a rapid evolution in drone and counter-drone technologies. This technological arms race extends beyond the battlefield, impacting research and development efforts that aim to produce more effective and cost-efficient solutions.

The Technological Arms Race

The competition between Ukrainian and Russian forces has led to significant advancements in drone technology. Ukrainian efforts have been particularly noteworthy due to their focus on creating cost-effective yet highly effective counter-drone solutions. This approach contrasts with the more traditional, and often more expensive, military-grade products typically used by larger, more established military forces.

In the Ukrainian context, the development of counter-drone technologies has included a range of innovative approaches. For instance, there has been a notable emphasis on integrating existing FPV (first-person view) drones with advanced software to enhance their capabilities. This integration aims to create a more seamless and effective counter-drone system that can quickly adapt to the changing dynamics of the battlefield.

Towards The Flying Minefield

The concept of the “flying minefield” is a significant development in modern warfare. This idea involves deploying large numbers of drones to create a mobile, lethal barrier to enemy aircraft. The feasibility of scaling this capability remains uncertain, but its potential impact on the battlefield is substantial.

The Threat of Fixed-Wing Reconnaissance Drones

Unlike the relatively inexpensive and readily replaceable $500 FPV drones, fixed-wing reconnaissance drones are not plentiful on either side of the conflict and cannot be rapidly replaced. The mere threat that these drones can now be intercepted by simple FPVs may be sufficient to keep them at a safer distance from the front lines, thereby reducing their effectiveness.

Recent video footage has shown Ukrainian FPVs intercepting Lancets, a type of loitering munition, en route to their targets. While a reconnaissance drone might circle overhead for several hours, a Lancet’s flight lasts only a few minutes. Successfully intercepting one requires a high level of coordination between sensors, air defense command, and drone operators, indicating the presence of an integrated counter-drone system.

Purpose-Built Interceptor Drones

There are various purpose-built interceptor drones, such as Fortem’s DroneHunter, Anduril’s Anvil, and Roadrunner, in addition to the MARSS Interceptor and Raytheon’s Coyote. These drones are typically larger and more expensive, designed to counter more substantial threats like the Russian/Iranian Shahed drones that have been used to bombard Ukraine.

Image : MARSS interceptor  – source :

The use of low-cost FPVs as anti-drone weapons represents a potential game changer. These FPVs may not be limited to targeting drones; there have been attempts to chase Russian helicopters with FPVs, though without success so far. Automated guidance and route planning are expected to increase the chances of successful hits. The mere risk of being hit might deter pilots from flying within range, potentially having a more significant impact than the actual number of helicopters damaged.

The Transition to Anti-Helicopter Drones

The progression from anti-drone to anti-helicopter drones is a small but significant step. The concept of a “flying minefield” involves deploying a large number of drones to create a mobile, lethal barrier to enemy aircraft. This type of weapon could be utilized by both sides in the conflict. For instance, the Russian company Red Line recently unveiled their Vogan-9SP interceptor. This drone features a bullet-shaped design capable of reaching speeds of 120 mph, with automated guidance and a proximity shrapnel warhead, eliminating the need for direct hits.

Challenges and Advancements in Deployment

While Russia has demonstrated many new drone types over the past few years, its bureaucratic procurement system has been less efficient in translating these innovations into deployed capabilities. In contrast, Ukraine’s BRAVE1 technology cluster has been highly effective, handing out hundreds of contracts and supplying thousands of drones, ground robots, seagoing drones, and other new capabilities to the front lines within very short timescales.

Integrating FPV Drones with Air Defense

In theory, linking existing FPV drones with air defense radar networks and adding software to lock onto aerial targets seems straightforward. However, such projects typically take years and cost millions. The rapid development pace seen in Ukraine, where significant advancements are made in a matter of days, stands in stark contrast to the more prolonged timelines seen in other military contexts.

The Role of the U.S. Replicator Program

The U.S. Replicator program aims to emulate Ukraine’s rapid pace of drone development, despite the historical trend of slower development timelines in the U.S. military. The impressive drone interceptions achieved by Ukraine highlight not just the effectiveness of the technology but also the speed at which it has been developed and deployed.

The Broader Implications

The advancements in drone and counter-drone technologies seen in the Ukrainian conflict have broader implications for modern warfare. These technologies are not limited to the battlefield but have potential applications in various security and defense contexts worldwide. The rapid development and deployment of these technologies underscore the importance of agility and innovation in modern military strategies.

Looking ahead, the development of counter-drone technologies is likely to continue evolving rapidly. As both state and non-state actors increasingly rely on drones for various purposes, the need for effective counter-drone solutions will become more critical. Innovations such as automated guidance systems, integrated air defense networks, and cost-effective interceptor drones will play a crucial role in shaping the future of modern warfare.

The parallels between the development of the Vogan-9SP and Ukraine’s counter-drone initiatives highlight the ongoing technological arms race in modern warfare. The advancements made in Ukraine, particularly in the rapid development and deployment of effective and cost-efficient counter-drone solutions, serve as a testament to the importance of innovation and agility in addressing emerging threats. As drone and counter-drone technologies continue to evolve, their impact on the battlefield and beyond will be profound, shaping the future of security and defense strategies worldwide.

Global Trends in Counter-Drone Technology

Beyond the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the interest in counter-drone interceptors has grown globally, driven by experiences in various theaters of war and the anticipation of future conflicts. The United States, for example, has been expanding its inventory of counter-drone systems like the Coyote interceptor developed by Raytheon. This system, available in both jet-powered and propeller-driven configurations, offers a versatile approach to countering drone threats.

The U.S. Army deploys Coyote interceptors from various platforms, including 4×4 mine-resistant vehicles equipped with radar, electro-optical sensors, and cannons. The cost-effectiveness of these interceptors, at approximately $100,000 each, makes them an attractive alternative to traditional surface-to-air missiles.

Other U.S. defense contractors, such as Anduril, have also developed counter-drone systems like the Interceptor quadcopter and the reusable jet-powered Roadrunner-M. These systems highlight the diverse approaches being explored to tackle the growing drone threat.

Implications for the Future

The appearance of the Vogan-9SP indicates Russia’s recognition of the evolving drone threat and its commitment to enhancing its counter-drone capabilities. Whether this system will become fully operational and be deployed in the battlefield remains to be seen. Sanctions and other challenges have raised questions about the capacity of the Russian defense industry to produce high-tech weapons.

Nonetheless, the development of the Vogan-9SP underscores the increasing importance of counter-drone technologies in modern warfare. As drones continue to play a significant role on and off traditional battlefields, the need for effective countermeasures will only grow. This trend is likely to drive further innovation and investment in this area, with significant implications for military strategy and defense procurement.

In conclusion, the Vogan-9SP represents a potentially significant advancement in Russia’s counter-drone arsenal, addressing a critical need in the ongoing conflict with Ukraine. As both sides continue to develop and deploy increasingly sophisticated drones and countermeasures, the battlefield dynamics will continue to evolve. The global interest in counter-drone technologies further highlights the importance of these systems in modern and future conflicts. Whether the Vogan-9SP will meet the operational needs of the Russian military remains to be seen, but its development is a clear indicator of the strategic priorities in this high-stakes technological arms race.

APPENDIX 1 – Towards The Flying Minefield: A Comprehensive Analysis of Modern Aerial Defense Systems

The rapid evolution of military technology has brought about significant advancements in the way nations approach defense and warfare. Among these advancements, the concept of the “flying minefield” stands out as a potentially transformative approach to aerial defense. This innovative strategy involves deploying a large number of drones to create a mobile, lethal barrier capable of neutralizing enemy aircraft. As we delve into this concept, it is essential to explore its feasibility, technological requirements, potential impact on modern warfare, and future developments.

Historical Context and Evolution of Aerial Defense Systems

Early Aerial Defense Mechanisms

Aerial defense systems have been a crucial component of military strategy since the advent of aviation. The earliest forms of aerial defense included anti-aircraft artillery and the use of balloons and kites to disrupt enemy aircraft. These rudimentary methods evolved rapidly with the development of radar technology during World War II, which significantly enhanced the ability to detect and intercept enemy planes.

Cold War Era Developments

The Cold War period saw substantial advancements in aerial defense technologies, driven by the arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union. Surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) became a cornerstone of defense systems, providing a more effective means of countering high-speed aircraft. The deployment of missile defense systems, such as the Nike series by the United States and the S-75 Dvina by the Soviet Union, marked a significant leap in aerial defense capabilities.

Modern Era: The Rise of Drones and UAVs

In recent decades, the development of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and drones has revolutionized both offensive and defensive military operations. Drones offer a range of capabilities, including surveillance, reconnaissance, and targeted strikes, making them versatile tools in modern warfare. The concept of a “flying minefield” leverages these advancements, proposing a networked swarm of drones to create an impenetrable barrier against enemy aircraft.

The Concept of the Flying Minefield

Defining the Flying Minefield

A flying minefield involves deploying numerous drones equipped with various sensors, weapons, and communication systems to create a dynamic and adaptable defensive barrier. Unlike traditional minefields, which are static and limited to ground-based threats, flying minefields offer mobility and the ability to counter aerial adversaries in real-time.

Key Components and Technologies

Drones and UAVs

The backbone of a flying minefield is the drones themselves. These UAVs can vary in size, capability, and function, ranging from small reconnaissance drones to larger, weaponized platforms. Key technological components include:

  • Sensors and Detection Systems: Advanced radar, infrared, and electro-optical sensors enable drones to detect and track enemy aircraft.
  • Communication Networks: Secure and robust communication links allow drones to share data and coordinate their movements, ensuring a cohesive defense network.
  • Weapon Systems: Depending on their size and mission, drones can be equipped with a variety of weapons, including missiles, machine guns, and electronic warfare tools.

Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy

Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a crucial role in the operation of a flying minefield. AI algorithms enable drones to make real-time decisions, adapt to changing threats, and optimize their deployment and attack strategies. Key AI capabilities include:

  • Autonomous Navigation: Drones must navigate complex environments, avoid obstacles, and maintain formation without direct human control.
  • Threat Assessment: AI systems analyze sensor data to identify and prioritize threats, ensuring efficient use of resources.
  • Swarm Coordination: AI enables multiple drones to operate as a cohesive unit, sharing information and coordinating their actions to maximize effectiveness.

Deployment Strategies and Scenarios

Static vs. Dynamic Deployment

Flying minefields can be deployed in both static and dynamic configurations. Static deployment involves positioning drones in a specific area to create a persistent defensive barrier. Dynamic deployment, on the other hand, involves constantly moving drones to adapt to changing battlefield conditions and threats.

Defensive vs. Offensive Applications

While primarily envisioned as a defensive tool, flying minefields can also be used offensively to disrupt enemy operations and create no-fly zones. By deploying drones in key areas, military forces can deny enemy access to critical airspace and protect valuable assets.

Technological Challenges and Feasibility

Scalability and Coordination

One of the primary challenges in implementing a flying minefield is scaling the capability to deploy and manage large numbers of drones. Coordinating hundreds or thousands of UAVs requires advanced communication networks and sophisticated AI algorithms. Ensuring seamless integration and cooperation among drones is critical to the success of this concept.

Countermeasures and Electronic Warfare

As with any military technology, the flying minefield must contend with potential countermeasures. Enemy forces may employ electronic warfare tactics to disrupt communication networks, jam sensors, or disable drones. Developing robust counter-countermeasures to maintain the integrity of the flying minefield is essential.

Cost and Logistics

The cost of deploying and maintaining a flying minefield can be substantial. Each drone represents a significant investment, and ensuring a continuous supply of operational UAVs requires efficient logistics and maintenance systems. Balancing the cost-effectiveness of this technology with its potential benefits is a critical consideration.

Potential Impact on Modern Warfare

Force Multiplier Effect

The flying minefield has the potential to act as a force multiplier, significantly enhancing the defensive capabilities of military forces. By creating a mobile and adaptable barrier, drones can provide comprehensive coverage and protection against a wide range of aerial threats.

Deterrence and Strategic Implications

The presence of a flying minefield can serve as a powerful deterrent, discouraging enemy forces from attempting aerial incursions. This capability can shift the strategic balance, compelling adversaries to reconsider their tactics and potentially reducing the likelihood of conflict.

Humanitarian Considerations

While the flying minefield offers significant military advantages, it also raises important humanitarian considerations. The deployment of autonomous drones in conflict zones necessitates stringent safeguards to minimize collateral damage and ensure compliance with international humanitarian law.

Future Developments and Innovations

Advancements in Drone Technology

Ongoing advancements in drone technology will continue to enhance the capabilities of flying minefields. Innovations in sensor technology, AI, and energy storage will improve the performance, endurance, and autonomy of drones, making them more effective and reliable.

Integration with Other Defense Systems

The flying minefield concept can be integrated with other defense systems, such as ground-based air defense units and manned aircraft, to create a comprehensive and multi-layered defense network. This integration will provide greater flexibility and resilience in responding to diverse threats.

International Collaboration and Regulation

As the flying minefield concept gains traction, international collaboration and regulation will be essential to ensure its responsible development and deployment. Establishing clear guidelines and standards for the use of autonomous drones in military operations will help mitigate potential risks and promote transparency.

The concept of the flying minefield represents a significant advancement in modern aerial defense systems. By leveraging the capabilities of drones, AI, and advanced communication networks, this innovative approach offers a mobile, adaptable, and effective means of countering aerial threats. While there are substantial technological and logistical challenges to overcome, the potential impact of flying minefields on modern warfare is profound. As nations continue to explore and develop this technology, it will be essential to balance its military benefits with humanitarian considerations and international regulations.

APPENDIX 2 – Analysis of the Vogan-9SP Combat Drone


The Vogan-9SP, developed by Russian specialists, represents a significant advancement in counter-UAV technology. It is a single-use combat drone designed to neutralize enemy UAVs through a direct interception and detonation approach. This analysis delves into the technical aspects, operational capabilities, and potential strategic applications of the Vogan-9SP.

Technical Specifications

  • Type: Single-use combat drone
  • Primary Function: Interception and neutralization of enemy UAVs
  • Launch Mechanism: 45-degree angle launch from a stationary launcher
  • Propulsion: Quadcopter propulsion allowing for rapid acceleration and agile maneuvering
  • Speed: Initially 200 km/h, with upgrades targeting over 250 km/h
  • Guidance System: Autonomous guidance with last-moment direction adjustments
  • Detection System: Integrated radar and laser systems to identify and illuminate targets
  • Control: Remote operator control with video feed decision-making

Operational Capabilities

  • Speed and Maneuverability
    • Initially capable of reaching speeds up to 200 km/h, the Vogan-9SP is designed for quick engagement. The upgrade will push this to over 250 km/h, enhancing its ability to intercept faster drones.
  • Guidance and Targeting
    • The drone operates in conjunction with a ground-based radar and a laser illumination system. These systems work together to detect, track, and illuminate the target, allowing the Vogan-9SP to lock on and intercept effectively.
  • Deployment and Launch
    • Launched from a fixed platform at a 45-degree angle, the drone quickly ascends and accelerates towards its target. This method ensures a rapid response time from detection to engagement.
  • Destruction Mechanism
    • The Vogan-9SP is equipped with a front-loaded explosive payload. This payload detonates upon proximity to the target, ensuring the destruction of both the Vogan-9SP and the enemy UAV.
  • Control and Decision-Making
    • Control is maintained via a remote operator who uses a video feed from the drone’s camera to make real-time decisions regarding target engagement, ensuring high precision in operations.

Strategic Applications

  • Anti-UAV Defense: Ideal for protecting sensitive locations from enemy surveillance or attack drones.
  • Force Multiplication: Allows conventional forces to concentrate on primary objectives while maintaining airspace security.
  • R&D Platform: Serves as a development platform for further advancements in drone interception technology.

Table: Vogan-9SP Specifications and Capabilities

TypeSingle-use combat drone
FunctionUAV interception and neutralization
Launch Mechanism45-degree angle from stationary launcher
Speed200 km/h (current), >250 km/h (planned upgrade)
GuidanceAutonomous with radar and laser illumination
ControlRemote operator with video feedback
Deployment TimeRapid deployment and interception capability
PayloadExplosive device in front section
Operational RangeTailored to engagement scenarios within line-of-sight
Testing StatusUndergoing field tests with potential upgrades in work

The Vogan-9SP represents a pivotal innovation in UAV defense technology, combining speed, precision, and destructiveness in a compact, remotely operated platform. As it progresses through testing and upgrades, its role in modern warfare and airspace security is expected to expand, reflecting its capabilities in intercepting and neutralizing emerging UAV threats.

Copyright of
Even partial reproduction of the contents is not permitted without prior authorization – Reproduction reserved



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Questo sito usa Akismet per ridurre lo spam. Scopri come i tuoi dati vengono elaborati.