The U.S. Space Force (USSF) is actively advancing its plans for a sophisticated and comprehensive surveillance network that will fundamentally reshape how the U.S. military monitors enemy movements. This network, which centers around space-based ground moving-target indicator (GMTI) and air moving-target indicator (AMTI) capabilities, represents the next major evolution in defense technology, with a goal to enhance surveillance in both terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments. These developments are aimed at countering the increasingly complex kill webs that adversaries are developing, which are designed to attack U.S. forces across multiple domains.
At the 2024 Defense News Conference in Arlington, Virginia, General Michael A. Guetlein, the Vice Chief of Space Operations for the U.S. Space Force, elaborated on these forthcoming initiatives. He shared updates on the timeline for deploying the first components of a satellite-based GMTI and AMTI capability, stating that the initial phases should begin rolling out in the early 2030s. This would mark a significant step forward in space-based surveillance, a mission that has been steadily gaining traction over the last several years.
However, General Guetlein emphasized that the surveillance network the U.S. military envisions will not be limited to space-based assets. Instead, it will include a “layered set of capabilities” designed to increase the system’s resilience. The network will be composed of multiple platforms, both airborne and spaceborne, and will integrate crewed aircraft, drones, and potentially other innovative platforms. The goal is to create a multi-layered defense system that is robust enough to survive and operate in contested environments, a need that has become increasingly urgent as adversaries develop sophisticated kill webs.
This layered surveillance concept has been discussed within military circles for years, but only recently has significant progress been made. Last month, the design baseline for the U.S. Space Force’s new satellite system was certified, allowing the program to move into the formal development phase. While the details of this system remain classified, the certification signifies a key milestone in the road to fielding these next-generation surveillance capabilities.
Historically, the U.S. military has relied heavily on aircraft for the GMTI and AMTI missions. Aircraft like the E-3 Sentry Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) and the now-retiring E-8C Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (JSTARS) have been central to these tasks. However, the growing need for persistence and survivability has driven the shift toward satellite-based systems. Space-based assets have long been seen as offering these advantages, and the move to field GMTI and AMTI satellites reflects this understanding.
Image: Boeing E-3 Sentry – sorce wikipedia
The U.S. National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) is also playing a crucial role in this surveillance transformation. It is reportedly acquiring a constellation of intelligence-gathering satellites from SpaceX, which are designed to track targets and support ground operations. This constellation will likely complement the U.S. Space Force’s plans for GMTI and AMTI, although the exact relationship between the NRO and USSF programs remains unclear.
In his remarks at the conference, General Guetlein highlighted the importance of maintaining a diverse array of platforms for these missions. He pointed out that, while satellites offer persistence and survivability, they are not without limitations. “The closer I can come to the target, the more resolution I get on the target,” Guetlein explained. “As I move to space, it becomes harder and harder to get that same level of resolution on a target that may be required.” This suggests that while satellites will play a key role in future GMTI and AMTI operations, aircraft and other platforms will still be needed to provide detailed, high-resolution tracking of targets.
A central theme of General Guetlein’s presentation was the increasing sophistication of adversary kill webs. These complex systems are designed to integrate multiple sensors, shooters, and communication networks into a single, highly responsive network capable of engaging multiple targets simultaneously. According to Guetlein, the adversary’s kill webs “fully integrate multiple sensors, multiple bullets, against multiple simultaneous targets, all fully networked together with multiple sensors and all talking together through multiple communication paths.” This represents a significant leap in the enemy’s ability to hold U.S. forces at risk across long distances and in multiple domains.
To counter these advanced threats, the U.S. Space Force is investing in three main areas: enhanced situational awareness, increased satellite communications (SATCOM), and the protection of space capabilities. Enhanced awareness is vital to preventing operational surprises, while improved SATCOM is necessary to support U.S. kill webs and ensure the U.S. military’s own communication and coordination capabilities remain robust. Additionally, protecting space assets is critical to maintaining the U.S.’s ability to operate in contested environments, particularly in the event of conflict.
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies is another important factor in the development of GMTI and AMTI capabilities. These technologies are expected to play a critical role in processing the massive amounts of data collected by space-based sensors. In a previous interview with Defense News, General Guetlein highlighted the need for “processing on orbit on the sensor rather than processing on the ground,” a shift that will require advanced AI and ML solutions to manage the data in real time. This technological leap will also necessitate new communication pathways and architectures, further complicating the challenge of building a resilient, multi-domain surveillance network.
The U.S. military has already taken steps toward space-based GMTI capabilities. Back in 2021, then-U.S. Space Force Chief General Jay Raymond revealed that the service was working to build a space-based GMTI system as part of a classified program. This effort dates back to at least 2018, when the Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office (RCO) initiated a project to explore space-based GMTI capabilities. GMTI radars are designed to discriminate between moving and stationary targets on the ground, allowing the military to track the movement of enemy forces over time. These radars can also provide synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery, which creates highly detailed ground maps, even in adverse weather conditions or obscured environments.
The plan to field space-based GMTI and AMTI capabilities has been a driving factor in the retirement of older surveillance platforms like the E-8C JSTARS and the U-2S Dragon Lady spy plane. These platforms, which have served the U.S. military for decades, are being phased out in favor of more advanced, survivable systems. One such replacement is the RQ-180, a high-altitude, long-endurance unmanned aircraft that is expected to take over the GMTI and SAR missions previously performed by the U-2S. The RQ-180’s ability to operate in contested airspace gives it a distinct advantage over earlier platforms, making it a critical asset in future conflicts.
General Guetlein did not explicitly mention the RQ-180 in his presentation, but his references to the need for a “layered set of capabilities” suggest that platforms like the RQ-180 will play an important role in the U.S. military’s future surveillance network. This layered approach, which integrates space-based and airborne assets, is designed to increase the system’s resilience and ensure that the U.S. can maintain situational awareness, even in the face of sophisticated enemy defenses.
Budget constraints remain a significant challenge for the U.S. Space Force as it seeks to develop these advanced capabilities. Despite steady increases in the USSF’s budget, General Guetlein acknowledged that the service is facing tough choices in terms of prioritizing its investments. “We know we can’t buy everything we need, so we are ruthlessly prioritizing all the kit that we’re buying to make sure that it’s the biggest bang for the buck,” he said. The USSF is focusing on readiness and ensuring that it has the capabilities needed to prevail in a crisis or conflict, even if that means sacrificing some capabilities in the short term.
As the U.S. Space Force continues to develop its GMTI and AMTI capabilities, it remains unclear exactly when these systems will come online. However, if the timelines discussed by General Guetlein hold true, the early 2030s will see the deployment of these next-generation surveillance assets. These capabilities will be crucial in any future conflict with a near-peer adversary, especially in the Pacific, where the U.S. is preparing for the possibility of a high-end fight with China.
The ability to track moving targets from space, combined with the resilience of a layered surveillance network, will give the U.S. military a significant advantage in future conflicts. As adversaries continue to develop and refine their kill webs, the U.S. Space Force’s investments in advanced surveillance technologies will be essential to maintaining the U.S.’s strategic edge. The future of warfare is increasingly moving into space, and the U.S. is positioning itself to lead the charge in this new era of military operations.
SPACE X – ELON MUSK
SpaceX, the aerospace company founded by Elon Musk in 2002, has emerged as a crucial player in the military and defense sectors of the United States, developing cutting-edge technologies that significantly enhance national security. The company’s collaboration with the U.S. military has been extensive, particularly in the fields of satellite technology, artificial intelligence, secure communications, and missile defense systems. This detailed report delves into SpaceX’s pivotal military projects, proprietary technologies, and contributions to the defense of the United States, offering comprehensive insights into the company’s role in transforming modern warfare.
Starshield: A Militarized Satellite Constellation
The Starshield project, SpaceX’s military-focused satellite initiative, was publicly unveiled in late 2022 and is designed to provide secure and specialized satellite services to U.S. government agencies. Built upon SpaceX’s successful Starlink infrastructure, Starshield is tailored specifically for national security needs, including Earth observation, secure communications, and hosting military payloads. Unlike Starlink, which serves commercial and civilian markets, Starshield features advanced encryption and security protocols, ensuring it meets the stringent requirements of U.S. military and intelligence operations.
Starshield satellites are interoperable with other space assets, utilizing SpaceX’s laser communication system to enhance connectivity between various government satellites. This integration of communication systems enables rapid data transmission across the military’s satellite network, creating a resilient and flexible system crucial for both peacetime operations and active conflicts. SpaceX’s ability to rapidly deploy satellites through its Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launch systems ensures the U.S. military has quick access to critical infrastructure in space.
One of the primary advantages of Starshield lies in its “proliferated Low Earth Orbit” (LEO) architecture. By deploying hundreds or even thousands of small satellites, Starshield offers enhanced resilience against enemy attacks, particularly in comparison to traditional satellite systems that rely on a small number of large, vulnerable satellites. In the event of a conflict, this distributed network could continue to provide crucial military capabilities, even if individual satellites were destroyed.
National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) Spy Satellite Program
SpaceX has been instrumental in the National Reconnaissance Office’s (NRO) efforts to expand the U.S.’s space-based intelligence capabilities. The NRO contracted SpaceX to build and launch a constellation of low-orbit spy satellites, which are designed to operate as a swarm, tracking ground-based targets in real time. This project has significant implications for military surveillance and reconnaissance, enabling U.S. forces to monitor adversarial activities with unprecedented precision.
These spy satellites use advanced imaging technology to provide continuous global surveillance, allowing the U.S. military to gather intelligence on a scale never before possible. The network integrates large imaging satellites with relay satellites that can transmit data in real time to military command centers, enabling rapid decision-making during operations.
This contract, which began with a $1.8 billion agreement in 2021, has since expanded as SpaceX continues to build and deploy more satellites to enhance U.S. intelligence capabilities. These efforts underscore SpaceX’s role as a key contractor for the NRO, which is responsible for the development and maintenance of the United States’ satellite reconnaissance infrastructure.
Space Development Agency’s Missile Tracking Constellation
In addition to its intelligence-gathering satellites, SpaceX is also a critical partner in the U.S. Space Development Agency’s efforts to develop a missile-tracking and missile-detection satellite constellation. These satellites are designed to detect missile launches, track their trajectories, and provide early warnings to U.S. military forces, enabling them to intercept and neutralize incoming threats.
The infrared sensor satellites, built in collaboration with defense contractor Leidos, are equipped with state-of-the-art missile detection systems that can identify and track enemy missiles from space. This is especially crucial given the increasing capabilities of near-peer adversaries like China and Russia, who have developed advanced missile systems capable of striking U.S. forces and allies around the world.
By leveraging its expertise in launching and deploying satellites, SpaceX has helped the U.S. military develop a resilient space-based missile defense system that provides real-time tracking data to U.S. defense networks. These efforts are part of a broader push by the Department of Defense (DoD) to create a multi-layered defense system that can intercept missiles in various stages of flight, from launch to impact.
Starlink: Dual-Use Commercial and Military Communications
While Starlink was initially developed as a commercial internet service provider, it has quickly become an essential asset for military communications, particularly in remote or conflict areas. Starlink’s high-bandwidth, low-latency internet service has been used by U.S. forces in various theaters of operation, including the conflict in Ukraine, where it has provided critical communication capabilities in areas where traditional infrastructure has been destroyed or is unavailable.
In addition to providing basic communication services, Starlink terminals have been integrated into U.S. military systems to provide secure, real-time data links between distributed forces. For example, during a large-scale live-fire exercise in 2020, the U.S. Air Force used Starlink to link military assets across the country, allowing them to coordinate attacks on drone and cruise missile targets. The success of this exercise demonstrated the viability of Starlink for military operations and solidified SpaceX’s role as a key provider of military communications.
Proprietary Technologies and AI Integration
SpaceX is at the forefront of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into its satellite and defense systems. AI is critical for managing the large constellations of satellites deployed by SpaceX, enabling automated monitoring, collision avoidance, and optimization of satellite orbits. AI also plays a vital role in the processing of the massive amounts of data collected by the company’s reconnaissance satellites.
In partnership with the DoD, SpaceX is exploring ways to leverage machine learning algorithms to improve the capabilities of its missile detection and tracking systems. By using AI to analyze data from infrared sensors, the U.S. military can detect anomalies and identify potential missile launches faster and with greater accuracy than traditional systems. This integration of AI into space defense systems represents a significant leap forward in the ability of U.S. forces to respond to emerging threats.
Partnerships with the Department of Defense
SpaceX’s role in U.S. military defense extends beyond satellites and AI. The company has secured numerous contracts with the Department of Defense to provide launch services for military payloads. These contracts include the launch of classified national security satellites and the deployment of experimental military technologies into orbit.
In 2020, SpaceX was awarded a $316 million contract to launch a series of national security payloads for the U.S. Space Force. The Falcon Heavy rocket, one of the most powerful rockets ever built, is expected to be used for many of these launches due to its ability to carry large payloads into high orbits. This contract solidifies SpaceX’s position as a critical provider of space launch services for the DoD, and the company is expected to continue playing a key role in U.S. military space operations for years to come.
Advanced Encryption and Cybersecurity
SpaceX has developed proprietary encryption technologies to ensure the security of its Starshield and Starlink communications networks. Given the increasing threats posed by cyberattacks, particularly from nation-state actors, SpaceX has integrated advanced cryptographic capabilities into its military-focused systems to protect sensitive data. These security measures meet the most stringent government requirements, making SpaceX’s satellites suitable for handling classified information and conducting secure communications in combat zones
The company’s focus on cybersecurity extends to its user terminals, which are designed to be interoperable with both Starlink and Starshield constellations. This flexibility allows military users to switch between commercial and government-owned satellites as needed, ensuring secure communications regardless of the operational environment
Expanding Role in National Security
As SpaceX continues to develop and deploy new technologies, its role in U.S. national security is expanding rapidly. The company is not only a key provider of satellite and launch services but is also driving innovation in areas such as AI, missile defense, and secure communications. With its ability to deliver end-to-end solutions — from satellite design to launch and operation — SpaceX is well-positioned to meet the evolving needs of the U.S. military.
In conclusion, SpaceX’s contributions to U.S. military defense have been transformative. Through projects like Starshield, the NRO spy satellite network, missile detection systems, and the use of AI, SpaceX is helping to create a new era of space-based defense capabilities. These efforts are critical to ensuring the U.S. maintains its strategic advantage in space, both in terms of intelligence-gathering and missile defense. With its proven ability to innovate and deliver results, SpaceX is set to remain a cornerstone of U.S. military space operations for the foreseeable future.
System/Project | Purpose/Role | Technical Specifications | Key Features | Partners/Contracts |
---|---|---|---|---|
Starshield | Military satellite constellation for secure communications and payload hosting | Built on Starlink’s low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite architecture. Includes secure encryption and high-assurance cryptographic capabilities. | – Designed for U.S. government use with Earth observation, secure communications, and hosted payloads. – Interoperable with Starlink via laser communication links. – Enhanced resilience through proliferated LEO architecture. | SpaceX, U.S. Space Force, U.S. government agencies |
Starlink | Commercial internet satellite system used for military communications | – Operates in LEO (550 km altitude) with over 4,000 active satellites. – User terminal: Flat-panel phased array antennas. | – High-speed internet (up to 150 Mbps) in remote and contested areas. – Proven military use in Ukraine and U.S. Air Force operations. | SpaceX, U.S. Air Force, Department of Defense |
NRO Spy Satellites (Unnamed Program) | Intelligence gathering through low-orbit spy satellites | – LEO-based satellite constellation. – Swarming technology for continuous Earth observation. – Equipped with advanced imaging systems and relay capabilities. | – Real-time tracking of ground-based targets globally. – Designed to operate as a distributed network for continuous surveillance. | National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), SpaceX |
Missile-Tracking Satellites | Missile detection and tracking using infrared sensors | – Infrared sensors for missile detection. – Scheduled to be deployed on Starshield and other classified satellites. | – Real-time missile tracking and early warning capabilities. – Integration with the U.S. Space Force’s missile defense systems. | Space Development Agency, Leidos, SpaceX |
Falcon 9 Rocket | Launch vehicle for military and commercial payloads | – Reusable two-stage rocket. – Payload capacity to LEO: 22,800 kg (50,265 lbs). – Propellant: Liquid oxygen (LOX) and RP-1 kerosene. | – Reusable first stage for cost-effective launches. – Can carry a variety of military and civilian payloads to space. | SpaceX, U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Space Force |
Falcon Heavy Rocket | Heavy-lift launch vehicle | – Reusable first-stage with three Falcon 9 cores. – Payload capacity to LEO: 63,800 kg (140,660 lbs). – Same propellant as Falcon 9. | – Capable of carrying large military payloads. – Heaviest operational rocket currently in use globally. | SpaceX, U.S. Department of Defense |
RQ-180 (Linked to Starshield) | Classified high-altitude, long-endurance surveillance UAV | – Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) – High-altitude, long-endurance. – Capable of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) and ground moving-target indicator (GMTI) functions. | – Operates in contested airspace for surveillance missions. – Expected to support space-based ISR missions through Starshield. | U.S. Air Force, SpaceX (speculative link to Starshield for ISR) |
Laser Communications System (Starshield/Starlink) | High-speed data transfer between satellites and ground stations | – SpaceX’s proprietary laser communication terminals. – Operates in free space optical communication (FSO) bands. – Speeds: up to 100 Gbps. | – Inter-satellite communication to reduce dependency on ground-based relays. – Increased data transmission speed and range. | SpaceX, U.S. government agencies |
AI Integration in Missile Detection | Use of AI for real-time data analysis and threat detection | – AI-driven anomaly detection. – Real-time data processing from infrared sensor arrays on missile-tracking satellites. | – Automates the identification of missile launches. – Supports decision-making in missile interception. | SpaceX, Department of Defense |
Encryption and Cybersecurity Systems | Protects military communications and data on Starshield and Starlink | – High-assurance cryptographic modules. – End-to-end encryption for secure data transmission. | – Meets government standards for classified communications. – Hardened against cyberattacks and electromagnetic interference (EMI). | SpaceX, U.S. Department of Defense |
This table provides a thorough technical overview of SpaceX’s contributions to U.S. military defense, including satellite systems, launch vehicles, proprietary technologies, and secure communications systems. The data is based on publicly available information from reliable sources and reflects SpaceX’s current position as a key defense contractor for the U.S. government.
APPENDIX 1 – Starshield – SPACE X
Number | Launch date | Function | Launch vehicle | Other designations | Status |
USA-350 | 19/03/2024 | Communications | Falcon 9 Block 5 | Starshield | Active |
USA-351 | 19/03/2024 | Communications | Falcon 9 Block 5 | Starshield | Active |
USA-352 | 21/03/2024 | Technology demonstration | Electron | NROL-123 (RASR-5) | Active |
USA-353 | 09/04/2024 | SIGINT | Delta IV Heavy | NROL-70 (Orion 12) | Active |
USA-354 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-355 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-356 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-357 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-358 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-359 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-360 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-361 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-362 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-363 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-364 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-365 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-366 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-367 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-368 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-369 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-370 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-371 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-372 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-373 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-374 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-375 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-376 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-377 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-378 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-379 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-380 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-381 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-382 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-383 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-384 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-385 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-386 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-387 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-388 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-389 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-390 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-391 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-392 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-393 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-394 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-395 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-396 | 30/07/2024 | TBA | Atlas V 551 | USSF-51 | Active |
USA-397 | 30/07/2024 | TBA | Atlas V 551 | USSF-51 | Active |
USA-398 | 30/07/2024 | TBA | Atlas V 551 | USSF-51 | Active |
USA-399 | 01/11/2022 | Technology demonstration | Falcon Heavy | Entered service, presumed active |
APPENDIX 2 – List of USA satellites – Defense – Military
Number | Launch date | Function | Launch vehicle | Other designations | Status |
USA-295 | 07/09/2017 | Classified | Falcon 9 | Unknown | Unknown |
USA-296 | 07/09/2017 | Classified | Falcon 9 | Unknown | Unknown |
USA-297 | 07/09/2017 | Classified | Falcon 9 | Unknown | Unknown |
USA-280 | 08/01/2018 | Classified | Falcon 9 Full Thrust | Zuma | Presumably failed[16][17][18] |
USA-294 | 31/01/2020 | Classified | Electron | NROL-151 | Unknown |
USA-301 | 13/06/2020 | Classified | Electron | RASR-2 | |
USA-302 | 13/06/2020 | Classified | Electron | RASR-2 | |
USA-303 | 13/06/2020 | Classified | Electron | RASR-2 | |
USA-4 | 28/08/1984 | Communications | Titan 34B | SDS | Out of service |
USA-9 | 08/02/1985 | Communications | Titan 34B | SDS | Out of service |
USA-11 | 03/10/1985 | Communications | Space Shuttle Atlantis | DSCS-III-B4 | Out of service |
USA-12 | 03/10/1985 | Communications | Space Shuttle Atlantis | DSCS-III-B5 | Out of service |
USA-20 | 05/12/1986 | Communications | Atlas G | Fltsatcom-7 | |
USA-21 | 12/02/1987 | Communications | Titan 34B | SDS | Out of service |
USA-40 | 08/08/1989 | Communications | Space Shuttle Columbia | SDS-2 | |
USA-43 | 04/09/1989 | Communications | Titan 34D / Transtage | DSCS-III-06 | |
USA-44 | 04/09/1989 | Communications | Titan 34D / Transtage | DSCS-III-07 | |
USA-46 | 25/09/1989 | Communications | Atlas G | Fltsatcom-8 | |
USA-55 | 05/04/1990 | Communications | Pegasus | GLOMR-2/SECS/TERCEL | |
USA-67 | 15/11/1990 | Communications | Space Shuttle Atlantis | SDS-2 | |
USA-78 | 11/02/1992 | Communications | Atlas II | DSCS-III-08 | |
USA-82 | 02/07/1992 | Communications | Atlas II | DSCS-III-09 | |
USA-89 | 02/12/1992 | Communications | Space Shuttle Discovery | SDS-2 | |
USA-93 | 19/07/1993 | Communications | Atlas II | DSCS-III-10 | |
USA-95 | 03/09/1993 | Communications | Atlas I | UHF F/O-2 | |
USA-97 | 28/11/1993 | Communications | Atlas II | DSCS-III-11 | |
USA-98 | 08/12/1993 | Communications | Delta II 7925 | NATO-4B | |
USA-99 | 07/02/1994 | Communications | Titan IV / Centaur | Milstar-DFS-1 | |
USA-104 | 24/06/1994 | Communications | Atlas I | UHF F/O-3 | |
USA-108 | 29/01/1995 | Communications | Atlas II | UHF F/O-4 | |
USA-111 | 31/05/1995 | Communications | Atlas II | UHF F/O-5 | Decommissioned |
USA-113 | 31/07/1995 | Communications | Atlas IIA | DSCS-III-B7 | Decommissioned |
USA-114 | 22/10/1995 | Communications | Atlas II | UHF F/O-6 | |
USA-115 | 06/11/1995 | Communications | Titan IV / Centaur | Milstar DFS-2 | |
USA-125 | 03/07/1996 | Communications | Titan IV | SDS-2 | |
USA-127 | 25/07/1996 | Communications | Atlas II | UHF F/O-7 | |
USA-134 | 25/10/1997 | Communications | Atlas IIA | DSCS-III-B13 | |
USA-137 | 29/01/1998 | Communications | Atlas IIA | NROL-5 (SDS-3) | |
USA-138 | 15/03/1998 | Communications | Atlas II | UHF F/O-8 | |
USA-140 | 20/10/1998 | Communications | Atlas IIA | UHF F/O-9 | |
USA-143 | 30/04/1999 | Communications | Titan IV / Centaur | Milstar DFS-3m | Failed: 1999-04-30 |
USA-146 | 23/11/1999 | Communications | Atlas IIA | UHF F/O-10 | |
USA-148 | 21/01/2000 | Communications | Atlas IIA | DSCS-III-B8 | |
USA-153 | 20/10/2000 | Communications | Atlas IIA | DSCS-III-B11 | |
USA-155 | 06/12/2000 | Communications | Atlas IIAS | NROL-10 (SDS-3) | |
USA-157 | 27/02/2001 | Communications | Titan IV / Centaur | Milstar DFS-4 | |
USA-162 | 11/10/2001 | Communications | Atlas IIAS | NROL-2 (SDS-3) | |
USA-164 | 16/01/2002 | Communications | Titan IV / Centaur | Milstar DFS-5 | |
USA-167 | 11/03/2003 | Communications | Delta IV M | DSCS-III-A3 | |
USA-169 | 08/04/2003 | Communications | Titan IV / Centaur | Milstar DFS-6 | |
USA-170 | 29/08/2003 | Communications | Delta IV M | DSCS-III-B6 | |
USA-174 | 18/12/2003 | Communications | Atlas IIIB | UHF F/O-11 | |
USA-179 | 31/08/2004 | Communications | Atlas IIAS | NROL-1 (SDS-3) | |
USA-195 | 11/10/2007 | Communications | Atlas V 421 | WGS-1 | |
USA-198 | 10/12/2007 | Communications | Atlas V 401 | NROL-24 (SDS-3) | |
USA-204 | 04/04/2009 | Communications | Atlas V 421 | WGS-2 | Active |
USA-211 | 06/12/2009 | Communications | Delta IV M+(5,4) | WGS-3 | Active |
USA-214 | 14/08/2010 | Communications | Atlas V 531 | AEHF-1 | Active |
USA-227 | 11/03/2011 | Communications | Delta IV M+(4,2) | NROL-27 (SDS-3) | Active |
USA-233 | 20/01/2012 | Communications | Delta IV M+(5,4) | WGS-4 | Active |
USA-235 | 04/05/2012 | Communications | Atlas V 531 | AEHF-2 | Active |
USA-236 | 20/06/2012 | Communications | Atlas V 401 | NROL-38 (SDS-3) | Active |
USA-243 | 25/05/2013 | Communications | Delta IV M+(5,4) | WGS-5 | Active |
USA-244 | 08/08/2013 | Communications | Delta IV M+(5,4) | WGS-6 | Active |
USA-246 | 18/09/2013 | Communications | Atlas V 531 | AEHF-3 | Active |
USA-252 | 22/05/2014 | Communications | Atlas V 401 | NROL-33 (SDS-3) | Active |
USA-269 | 28/07/2016 | Communications | Atlas V 421 | NROL-61 (Quasar, Spike) | Active |
USA-279 | 15/10/2017 | Communications | Atlas V 421 | NROL-52 (Quasar) | Active |
USA-283 | 14/04/2018 | Communications | Atlas V 551 | AFSPC-11 / CBAS | Active |
USA-288 | 17/10/2018 | Communications | Atlas V 551 | AEHF-4 | Active |
USA-292 | 08/08/2019 | Communications | Atlas V 551 | AEHF-5 | Active |
USA-298 | 26/03/2020 | Communications | Atlas V 551 | AEHF-6 | Testing |
USA-342 | 16/01/2023 | Communications | Falcon Heavy | CBAS 2 | |
USA-350 | 19/03/2024 | Communications | Falcon 9 Block 5 | Starshield | Active |
USA-351 | 19/03/2024 | Communications | Falcon 9 Block 5 | Starshield | Active |
USA-141 | 03/10/1998 | Debris | Taurus | ATEX | Failed: 1999-01-16 |
USA-315 | 18/05/2021 | Early warning | Atlas V 421 | SBIRS GEO-5 | Entered service, presumed active |
USA-336 | 04/08/2022 | Early warning | Atlas V 421 | SBIRS GEO-6 | Entered service, presumed active |
USA-332 | 01/07/2022 | Early warning / Technology | Atlas V 541 | WFOV (USSF-12) | Active |
USA-3 | 25/05/1984 | ELINT | Titan 34D | SSF-D | Out of service |
USA-8 | 24/01/1985 | ELINT | Space Shuttle Discovery | Magnum | Out of service |
USA-31 | 02/09/1988 | ELINT | Titan 34D / Transtage | Chalet | Failed |
USA-32 | 05/09/1988 | ELINT | Titan 23G | Singleton/SBWASS-R | |
USA-37 | 10/05/1989 | ELINT | Titan 34D / Transtage | Chalet | Out of service |
USA-41 | 08/08/1989 | ELINT | Space Shuttle Columbia | SSF/COBRA BRASS | Decayed: 1989-12-31 |
USA-45 | 06/09/1989 | ELINT | Titan 23G | Singleton/SBWASS-R | Failed |
USA-48 | 23/11/1989 | ELINT | Space Shuttle Discovery | Magnum | |
USA-81 | 25/04/1992 | ELINT | Titan 23G | Singleton/SBWASS-R | |
USA-103 | 03/05/1994 | ELINT | Titan IV / Centaur | Trumpet | |
USA-105 | 27/08/1994 | ELINT | Titan IV / Centaur | Mercury | |
USA-112 | 10/07/1995 | ELINT | Titan IV / Centaur | Trumpet | |
USA-118 | 24/04/1996 | ELINT | Titan IV / Centaur | Mercury | |
USA-136 | 06/11/1997 | ELINT | Titan IV / Centaur | NROL-4 (Trumpet) | |
USA-184 | 25/06/2006 | ELINT | Delta IV M+(4,2) | NROL-22 (Imp. Trumpet) | |
USA-200 | 13/03/2008 | ELINT | Atlas V 411 | NROL-28 (Imp. Trumpet) | |
USA-250 | 10/04/2014 | ELINT | Atlas V 541 | NROL-67 | Active |
USA-257 | 17/09/2014 | ELINT | Atlas V 401 | CLIO[15] | Active |
USA-259 | 13/12/2014 | ELINT | Atlas V 401 | NROL-35 | Active |
USA-278 | 24/09/2017 | ELINT | Atlas V 541 | NROL-42 (Trumpet) | Active |
USA-15 | 09/02/1986 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas H | NOSS (PARCAE/White Cloud) | Out of service |
USA-16 | 09/02/1986 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas H | NOSS (PARCAE/White Cloud) | Out of service |
USA-17 | 09/02/1986 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas H | NOSS (PARCAE/White Cloud) | Out of service |
USA-18 | 09/02/1986 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas H | NOSS (PARCAE/White Cloud) | Out of service |
USA-22 | 15/05/1987 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas H | NOSS (PARCAE/White Cloud) | Out of service |
USA-23 | 15/05/1987 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas H | NOSS (PARCAE/White Cloud) | Out of service |
USA-24 | 15/05/1987 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas H | NOSS (PARCAE/White Cloud) | Out of service |
USA-25 | 15/05/1987 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas H | NOSS (PARCAE/White Cloud) | Out of service |
USA-59 | 08/06/1990 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Titan IV | NOSS-2 | |
USA-60 | 08/06/1990 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Titan IV | NOSS-2 | |
USA-61 | 08/06/1990 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Titan IV | NOSS-2 | |
USA-62 | 08/06/1990 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Titan IV | NOSS-2 | |
USA-72 | 08/11/1991 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Titan IV | NOSS-2 | |
USA-74 | 08/11/1991 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Titan IV | NOSS-2 | |
USA-76 | 08/11/1991 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Titan IV | NOSS-2 | |
USA-77 | 08/11/1991 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Titan IV | NOSS-2 | |
USA-119 | 12/05/1996 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Titan IV | NOSS-2 | |
USA-120 | 12/05/1996 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Titan IV | NOSS-2 | |
USA-121 | 12/05/1996 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Titan IV | NOSS-2 | |
USA-122 | 12/05/1996 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Titan IV | NOSS-2 | |
USA-160 | 08/09/2001 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas IIAS | NROL-13 (NOSS-3 “Intruder”) | |
USA-173 | 02/12/2003 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas IIAS | NROL-18 (NOSS-3 “Intruder”) | |
USA-181 | 03/02/2005 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas IIIB | NROL-23 (NOSS-3 “Intruder”) | |
USA-194 | 15/06/2007 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas V 401 | NROL-30 (NOSS-3 “Intruder”) | |
USA-229 | 15/04/2011 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas V 411 | NROL-34 (NOSS-3 “Intruder”) | Active |
USA-238 | 13/09/2012 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas V 401 | NROL-36 (NOSS-3 “Intruder”) | Active |
USA-264 | 08/10/2015 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas V 401 | NROL-55 (NOSS-3 “Intruder”) | Active |
USA-274 | 01/03/2017 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Atlas V 401 | NROL-79 (NOSS-3 “Intruder”) | Active |
USA-327 | 17/04/2022 | ELINT / Ocean surveillance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-85 (NOSS-3 “Intruder”) | Entered service, presumed active |
USA-333 | 01/07/2022 | Experimental | Atlas V 541 | USSF-12 Ring | Active |
USA-13 | 13/12/1985 | Inflatable ASAT target | Scout-G | ITV-1 | Failed. Decayed: 1989-05-11 |
USA-14 | 13/12/1985 | Inflatable ASAT target | Scout-G | ITV-2 | Decayed: 1987-08-09 |
USA-263 | 24/07/2015 | Military communications | Delta IV M+ (5,4) | WGS-7 | Active |
USA-272 | 07/12/2016 | Military communications | Delta IV M+ (5,4) | WGS-8 | Active |
USA-275 | 19/03/2017 | Military communications | Delta IV M+ (5,4) | WGS-9 | Active |
USA-291 | 15/03/2019 | Military communications | Delta IV M+ (5,4) | WGS-10 | Active |
USA-7 | 22/12/1984 | Missile detection | Titan 34D / Transtage | DSP-2-6R | Retired: 31 December 1994 |
USA-28 | 29/11/1987 | Missile detection | Titan 34D / Transtage | DSP-2-5R | Retired: 1987-12-31 |
USA-39 | 14/06/1989 | Missile detection | Titan IV / IUS | DSP-1-14 F14 | Decommissioned |
USA-65 | 13/11/1990 | Missile detection | Titan IV / IUS | DSP-1-14 F15 | Decommissioned |
USA-75 | 24/11/1991 | Missile detection | Space Shuttle Atlantis | DSP-1-14-F16 | |
USA-107 | 22/12/1994 | Missile detection | Titan IV / IUS | DSP-1 F17 | Active |
USA-130 | 23/02/1997 | Missile detection | Titan IVB/IUS | DSP-1-18 F18 | Out of service |
USA-149 | 08/05/2000 | Missile detection | Titan IVB/IUS | DSP-1-18 F20 | Active |
USA-159 | 06/08/2001 | Missile detection | Titan IVB/IUS | DSP-1-18 F21 | Active |
USA-176 | 14/02/2004 | Missile detection | Titan IVB/IUS | DSP-1-18 F22 | Active |
USA-197 | 11/11/2007 | Missile detection | Delta IV Heavy | DSP-1-18 F23 | Failed |
USA-230 | 07/05/2011 | Missile detection | Atlas V 401 | SBIRS GEO-1 | Active |
USA-241 | 19/03/2013 | Missile detection | Atlas V 401 | SBIRS GEO-2 | Active |
USA-273 | 21/01/2017 | Missile detection | Atlas V 401 | SBIRS GEO-3 | Commissioning |
USA-282 | 20/01/2018 | Missile detection | Atlas V 411 | SBIRS GEO-4 | Active |
USA-1 | 13/06/1984 | Navigation | Atlas E/F | Navstar-9 | Out of service |
USA-5 | 08/09/1984 | Navigation | Atlas E/F | Navstar-10 | Out of service |
USA-10 | 09/10/1985 | Navigation | Atlas E/F | Navstar-11 | Out of service |
USA-35 | 14/02/1989 | Navigation | Delta II 6925-9.5 | GPS-II-1 | Retired: 2000-04-14 |
USA-38 | 10/06/1989 | Navigation | Delta II 6925-9.5 | GPS-II-2 | Out of service |
USA-42 | 18/08/1989 | Navigation | Delta II 6925-9.5 | GPS-II-3 | Out of service |
USA-47 | 21/10/1989 | Navigation | Delta II 6925-9.5 | GPS-II-4 | Out of service |
USA-49 | 11/12/1989 | Navigation | Delta II 6925-9.5 | GPS-II-5 | Out of service |
USA-50 | 24/01/1990 | Navigation | Delta II 6925-9.5 | GPS-II-6 | Out of service |
USA-54 | 26/03/1990 | Navigation | Delta II 6925-9.5 | GPS-II-7 | Failed: 1996-05-21 |
USA-63 | 02/08/1990 | Navigation | Delta II 6925-9.5 | GPS-II-8 | Out of service |
USA-64 | 01/10/1990 | Navigation | Delta II 6925-9.5 | GPS-II-9 | Out of service |
USA-66 | 26/11/1990 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-1 | Out of service |
USA-71 | 04/07/1991 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-2 | Out of service |
USA-79 | 23/02/1992 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-3 | Decommissioned |
USA-80 | 10/04/1992 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-4 | Out of service |
USA-83 | 07/07/1992 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-5 | Out of service |
USA-84 | 09/09/1992 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-6 | Out of service |
USA-85 | 22/11/1992 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-7 | Out of service |
USA-87 | 18/12/1992 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-8 | Out of service |
USA-88 | 03/02/1993 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-9 | Out of service |
USA-90 | 30/03/1993 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-10 | Out of service |
USA-91 | 13/05/1993 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-11 | Out of service |
USA-92 | 26/06/1993 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-12 | Out of service |
USA-94 | 30/08/1993 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-13 | Out of service |
USA-96 | 26/10/1993 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-14 | Out of service |
USA-100 | 10/03/1994 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-15 | Out of service |
USA-117 | 28/03/1996 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-16 | Out of service |
USA-126 | 16/07/1996 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-17 | Decommissioned |
USA-128 | 12/09/1996 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-18 | Out of service |
USA-132 | 23/07/1997 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-2 | Active |
USA-135 | 06/11/1997 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIA-19 | Out of service |
USA-145 | 07/10/1999 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-3 | |
USA-150 | 11/05/2000 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-4 | |
USA-151 | 16/07/2000 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-5 | |
USA-154 | 10/11/2000 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-6 | Decommissioned |
USA-156 | 30/01/2001 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-7 | |
USA-166 | 29/01/2003 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-8 | |
USA-168 | 31/03/2003 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-9 | |
USA-175 | 21/12/2003 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-10 | |
USA-177 | 20/03/2004 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-11 | |
USA-178 | 23/06/2004 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-12 | |
USA-180 | 06/11/2004 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-13 | |
USA-183 | 26/09/2005 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-14 (IIRM-1) | |
USA-190 | 25/09/2006 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-15 (IIRM-2) | Active |
USA-192 | 17/11/2006 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-16 (IIRM-3) | Active |
USA-196 | 17/10/2007 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-17 (IIRM-4) | Active |
USA-199 | 20/12/2007 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-18 (IIRM-5) | Active |
USA-201 | 15/03/2008 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-19 (IIRM-6) | Active |
USA-203 | 24/03/2009 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS-IIR-20 (IIRM-7) | Active |
USA-206 | 17/08/2009 | Navigation | Delta II 7925-9.5 | GPS IIR-21 (IIRM-8) | Active |
USA-213 | 28/05/2010 | Navigation | Delta IV M+(4,2) | GPS IIF-1 | Active |
USA-232 | 16/07/2011 | Navigation | Delta IV M+(4,2) | GPS IIF-2 | Active |
USA-239 | 04/10/2012 | Navigation | Delta IV M+(4,2) | GPS IIF-3 | Active |
USA-242 | 15/05/2013 | Navigation | Atlas V 401 | GPS IIF-4 | Active |
USA-248 | 21/02/2014 | Navigation | Delta IV M+(4,2) | GPS IIF-5 | Active |
USA-251 | 17/05/2014 | Navigation | Delta IV M+(4,2) | GPS IIF-6 | Active |
USA-256 | 02/08/2014 | Navigation | Atlas V 401 | GPS IIF-7 | Active |
USA-258 | 29/10/2014 | Navigation | Atlas V 401 | GPS IIF-8 | Active |
USA-260 | 25/03/2015 | Navigation | Delta IV M+(4,2) | GPS IIF-9 | Active |
USA-262 | 15/07/2015 | Navigation | Atlas V 401 | GPS IIF-10 | Active |
USA-265 | 31/10/2015 | Navigation | Atlas V 401 | GPS IIF-11 | Active |
USA-266 | 05/02/2016 | Navigation | Atlas V 401 | GPS IIF-12 | Active |
USA-289 | 23/12/2018 | Navigation | Falcon 9 Block 5 | GPS III-SV01 | Active |
USA-293 | 22/08/2019 | Navigation | Delta IV | GPS III-SV02 | Active |
USA-304 | 30/06/2020 | Navigation | Falcon 9 Block 5 | GPS III-SV03 | Active |
USA-309 | 05/11/2020 | Navigation | Falcon 9 Block 5 | GPS III-SV04 | |
USA-319 | 17/06/2021 | Navigation | Falcon 9 Block 5 | GPS III-SV05 | |
USA-343 | 18/01/2023 | Navigation | Falcon 9 Block 5 | GPS III-SV06 | Active |
USA-314 | 26/04/2021 | Optical reconnaissance | Delta IV Heavy | NROL-82 (EIS) | Entered service, presumed active |
USA-338 | 24/09/2022 | Optical reconnaissance | Delta IV Heavy | NROL-91 (KH-11 19) | Entered service, presumed active |
USA-86 | 28/11/1992 | Optical reconnaissance | Titan IV | KH-11 | |
USA-116 | 05/12/1995 | Optical reconnaissance | Titan IV | KH-11 | Presumed deorbited |
USA-129 | 20/12/1996 | Optical reconnaissance | Titan IV | 412 (KH-11) | Out of service |
USA-161 | 05/10/2001 | Optical reconnaissance | Titan IVB | NROL-14 (KH-11) | Active |
USA-186 | 19/10/2005 | Optical reconnaissance | Titan IVB | NROL-20 (KH-11) | Active |
USA-224 | 20/01/2011 | Optical reconnaissance | Delta IV Heavy | NROL-49 (KH-11 Kennen) | Active |
USA-231 | 30/06/2011 | Optical reconnaissance | Minotaur I | ORS-1 | Active |
USA-245 | 28/08/2013 | Optical reconnaissance | Delta IV Heavy | NROL-65 (KH-11 Kennen) | Active |
USA-290 | 19/01/2019 | Optical reconnaissance | Delta IV Heavy | NROL-71 (KH-11 Kennen) | Active |
USA-326 | 02/02/2022 | Optical reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-87 | Entered service, presumed active |
USA-276 | 01/05/2017 | Radar Imaging | Falcon 9 Full Thrust | NROL-76 | Active |
USA-34 | 02/12/1988 | Radar reconnaissance | Space Shuttle Atlantis | Lacrosse | Deorbited: 1997-03-25 |
USA-69 | 08/03/1991 | Radar reconnaissance | Titan IV | Lacrosse | Out of service |
USA-133 | 24/10/1997 | Radar reconnaissance | Titan IV | NROL-3 (Lacrosse) | Active |
USA-152 | 17/08/2000 | Radar reconnaissance | Titan IVB | NROL-11 (Lacrosse/Onyx) | Active |
USA-182 | 30/04/2005 | Radar reconnaissance | Titan IVB | NROL-16 (Lacrosse/Onyx) | Active |
USA-215 | 21/09/2010 | Radar reconnaissance | Atlas V 501 | NROL-41 (FIA-R) | Active |
USA-234 | 03/04/2012 | Radar reconnaissance | Delta IV M+(5,2) | NROL-25 (FIA-R) | Active |
USA-247 | 06/12/2013 | Radar reconnaissance | Atlas V 501 | NROL-39 (FIA-R) | Active |
USA-267 | 10/02/2016 | Radar reconnaissance | Delta IV M+(5,2) | NROL-45 (FIA-R) | Active |
USA-281 | 12/01/2018 | Radar reconnaissance | Delta IV M+(5,2) | NROL-47 (FIA-R) | Active |
USA-2 | 25/05/1984 | Reconnaissance | Titan 34D | KH-9 | Deorbited: 18 October 1984 |
USA-6 | 04/12/1984 | Reconnaissance | Titan 34D | KH-11 | Decayed: 31 December 1990 |
USA-27 | 26/10/1987 | Reconnaissance | Titan 34D | KH-11 | Decayed: 1992-05-31 |
USA-33 | 06/11/1988 | Reconnaissance | Titan 34D | KH-11 | Out of service |
USA-53 | 28/02/1990 | Reconnaissance | Space Shuttle Atlantis | Misty | Presumed deorbited |
USA-144 | 22/05/1999 | Reconnaissance | Titan IV | NROL-9 (Misty) | Unknown |
USA-316 | 15/06/2021 | Reconnaissance | Minotaur I | NROL-111 | Entered service, presumed active |
USA-317 | 15/06/2021 | Reconnaissance | Minotaur I | NROL-111 | Entered service, presumed active |
USA-318 | 15/06/2021 | Reconnaissance | Minotaur I | NROL-111 | Entered service, presumed active |
USA-354 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-355 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-356 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-357 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-358 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-359 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-360 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-361 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-362 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-363 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-364 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-365 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-366 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-367 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-368 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-369 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-370 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-371 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-372 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-373 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-374 | 22/05/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-375 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-376 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-377 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-378 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-379 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-380 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-381 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-382 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-383 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-384 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-385 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-386 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-387 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-388 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-389 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-390 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-146 | Active |
USA-391 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-392 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-393 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-394 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-395 | 29/06/2024 | Reconnaissance | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-186 | Active |
USA-216 | 26/09/2010 | Satellite tracking | Minotaur IV | SBSS-1 | Active |
USA-218 | 20/11/2010 | Science | Minotaur IV / HAPS | RAX | Active |
USA-19 | 05/09/1986 | Sensor development | Delta 3920 | SDI | Deorbited: 1986-09-28 |
USA-110 | 14/05/1995 | SIGINT | Titan IV / Centaur | Mentor | |
USA-139 | 09/05/1998 | SIGINT | Titan IV / Centaur | NROL-6 (Mentor) | |
USA-171 | 09/09/2003 | SIGINT | Titan IV / Centaur | NROL-19 (Mentor) | |
USA-202 | 18/01/2009 | SIGINT | Delta IV Heavy | NROL-26 (Mentor) | Active |
USA-207 | 08/09/2009 | SIGINT | Atlas V 401 | Palladium At Night (PAN) | Active? |
USA-223 | 21/11/2010 | SIGINT | Delta IV Heavy | NROL-32 (Mentor) | Active |
USA-237 | 29/06/2012 | SIGINT | Delta IV Heavy | NROL-15 (Imp. Mentor) | Active |
USA-268 | 11/06/2016 | SIGINT | Delta IV Heavy | NROL-37 (Orion / Mentor) | Active |
USA-311 | 10/12/2020 | SIGINT | Delta IV Heavy | NROL-44 (mentor) | |
USA-345 | 22/06/2023 | SIGINT | Delta IV Heavy | NROL-68 (Orion 11) | Active |
USA-353 | 09/04/2024 | SIGINT | Delta IV Heavy | NROL-70 (Orion 12) | Active |
USA-346 | 10/09/2023 | Space domain awareness | Atlas V 551 | NROL-107 (Silentbarker 1) | Entered service, presumed active |
USA-347 | 10/09/2023 | Space domain awareness | Atlas V 551 | NROL-107 (Silentbarker 2) | Entered service, presumed active |
USA-348 | 10/09/2023 | Space domain awareness | Atlas V 551 | NROL-107 (Silentbarker 3) | Entered service, presumed active |
USA-324 | 21/01/2022 | Space surveillance | Atlas V 511 | GSSAP 5 (Hornet 5) | Active |
USA-325 | 21/01/2022 | Space surveillance | Atlas V 511 | GSSAP 6 (Hornet 6) | Active |
USA-253 | 28/07/2014 | Surveillance | Delta IV M+(4,2) | GSSAP 1 | Active |
USA-254 | 28/07/2014 | Surveillance | Delta IV M+(4,2) | GSSAP 2 | Out of service |
USA-270 | 19/08/2016 | Surveillance | Delta IV M+(4,2) | GSSAP 3 | Active |
USA-271 | 19/08/2016 | Surveillance | Delta IV M+(4,2) | GSSAP 4 | Active |
USA-396 | 30/07/2024 | TBA | Atlas V 551 | USSF-51 | Active |
USA-397 | 30/07/2024 | TBA | Atlas V 551 | USSF-51 | Active |
USA-398 | 30/07/2024 | TBA | Atlas V 551 | USSF-51 | Active |
USA-51 | 14/02/1990 | Technology | Delta II 6920-8 | LACE/Losat-L | Decayed: 2000-05-24 |
USA-52 | 14/02/1990 | Technology | Delta II 6920-8 | RME/Losat-R | Decayed: 1992-05-24 |
USA-56 | 11/04/1990 | Technology | Atlas E/F | P87-2/Stacksat/POGS/SSR[2] | Out of service |
USA-57 | 11/04/1990 | Technology | Atlas E/F | P87-2/Stacksat/TEX[3] | Out of service |
USA-58 | 11/04/1990 | Technology | Atlas E/F | P87-2/Stacksat/SCE[3] | Out of service |
USA-123 | 12/05/1996 | Technology | Titan IV | TIPS-Ralph | |
USA-124 | 12/05/1996 | Technology | Titan IV | TIPS-Norton | |
USA-187 | 21/06/2006 | Technology | Delta II 7925 | MiTEx-A | |
USA-188 | 21/06/2006 | Technology | Delta II 7925 | MiTEx-B | |
USA-189 | 21/06/2006 | Technology | Delta II 7925 | MiTEx Carrier | |
USA-205 | 05/05/2009 | Technology | Delta II 7920-10C | STSS-ATRR | Active |
USA-208 | 25/09/2009 | Technology | Delta II 7920-10C | STSS-Demo | Decommissioned[9] |
USA-209 | 25/09/2009 | Technology | Delta II 7920-10C | STSS-Demo | Decommissioned[9] |
USA-212 | 22/04/2010 | Technology | Atlas V 501 | Boeing X-37B OTV-1 | Landed: 2010-12-03 |
USA-217 | 20/11/2010 | Technology | Minotaur IV / HAPS | STPSat-1 | Active |
USA-219 | 20/11/2010 | Technology | Minotaur IV / HAPS | O/OREOS | Active |
USA-221 | 20/11/2010 | Technology | Minotaur IV / HAPS | FalconSAT-5 | Active |
USA-222 | 20/11/2010 | Technology | Minotaur IV / HAPS | FASTRAC | Active |
USA-228 | 20/11/2010 | Technology | Minotaur IV/HAPS | FASTRAC | Active |
USA-225 | 06/02/2011 | Technology | Minotaur I | NROL-66 (Rapid Pathfinder Prototype) | Active |
USA-226 | 05/03/2011 | Technology | Atlas V 501 | Boeing X-37B OTV-2 | Landed: 2012-06-16 |
USA-240 | 11/12/2012 | Technology | Atlas V 501 | Boeing X-37B OTV-3 | Landed: 2014-10-17 |
USA-255 | 28/07/2014 | Technology | Delta IV M+(4,2) | ANGELS | Out of service |
USA-261 | 20/05/2015 | Technology | Atlas V 501 | Boeing X-37B OTV-4 | Landed: 2017-05-07 |
USA-277 | 07/09/2017 | Technology | Falcon 9 Full Thrust | Boeing X-37B OTV-5 | Active |
USA-299 | 17/05/2020 | Technology | Atlas V 501 | Boeing X-37B OTV-6 (USSF-7) | Landed: 2022-11-12 |
USA-349 | 29/12/2023 | Technology | Falcon Heavy | X-37B OTV-7 (USSF-52) | Active |
USA-220 | 20/11/2010 | Technology demonstration | Minotaur IV / HAPS | FASTSAT | Active |
USA-284 | 14/04/2018 | Technology demonstration | Atlas V 551 | AFSPC-11 / EAGLE | Active |
USA-339 | 01/11/2022 | Technology demonstration | Falcon Heavy | Shepherd Demonstration | Entered service, presumed active |
USA-340 | 01/11/2022 | Technology demonstration | Falcon Heavy | Entered service, presumed active | |
USA-341 | 01/11/2022 | Technology demonstration | Falcon Heavy | Entered service, presumed active | |
USA-344 | 01/11/2022 | Technology demonstration | Falcon Heavy | USUVL | Active |
USA-399 | 01/11/2022 | Technology demonstration | Falcon Heavy | Entered service, presumed active | |
USA-352 | 21/03/2024 | Technology demonstration | Electron | NROL-123 (RASR-5) | Active |
USA-70 | 28/04/1991 | Technology development | Space Shuttle Discovery | MPEC | |
USA-101 | 13/03/1994 | Technology development | Taurus | STEP-0 | |
USA-102 | 13/03/1994 | Technology development | Taurus | DarpaSat | |
USA-165 | 11/04/2005 | Technology development | Minotaur | XSS-11 | |
USA-185 | 23/09/2005 | Technology development | Minotaur | STP-R1 | |
USA-158 | 18/05/2001 | Technology / Communications | Delta II 7925-9.5 | NROL-17 (GeoLITE) | |
USA-30 | 08/02/1988 | Training satellite | Delta 3910 | SDI | Deorbited: 1988-03-01 |
USA-26 | 20/06/1987 | Weather | Atlas E/F | DMSP-5D2 F3 (S8) | |
USA-29 | 03/02/1988 | Weather | Atlas E/F | DMSP-5D2 F4 (S-9) | |
USA-68 | 01/12/1990 | Weather | Atlas E/F | DMSP-5D2 F5 (S-10) | Failed |
USA-73 | 28/11/1991 | Weather | Atlas E/F | DMSP-5D2 F6 (S-12) | |
USA-106 | 29/08/1994 | Weather | Atlas E/F | DMSP 5D-1 F12 | |
USA-109 | 24/03/1995 | Weather | Atlas E/F | DMSP 5D-1 F13 | Destroyed: 2015-02-03 |
USA-131 | 04/04/1997 | Weather | Titan 23G | DMSP 5D-2 F14 | |
USA-147 | 12/12/1999 | Weather | Titan 23G | DMSP 5D-3 F15 | |
USA-172 | 18/10/2003 | Weather | Titan 23G | DMSP 5D-3 F16 | |
USA-191 | 04/11/2006 | Weather | Delta IV M | DMSP 5D-3 F17 | |
USA-210 | 18/10/2009 | Weather | Atlas V 401 | DMSP-5D-3 F18 | Active |
USA-249 | 03/04/2014 | Weather | Atlas V 401 | DMSP-5D-3 F19 | Inactive[14] |
USA-36 | 24/03/1989 | Delta 3920-8 | Delta Star | Decayed: 1992-06-23 | |
USA-300 | 17/05/2020 | Atlas V 501 | FalconSAT-8 | ||
USA-305 | 15/07/2020 | Minotaur IV / Orion 38 | NROL-129 | ||
USA-306 | 15/07/2020 | Minotaur IV / Orion 38 | NROL-129 | ||
USA-307 | 15/07/2020 | Minotaur IV / Orion 38 | NROL-129 | ||
USA-308 | 15/07/2020 | Minotaur IV / Orion 38 | NROL-129 | ||
USA-310 | 13/11/2020 | Atlas V 531 | NROL-101 | ||
USA-312 | 19/12/2020 | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-108 | ||
USA-313 | 19/12/2020 | Falcon 9 Block 5 | NROL-108 | ||
USA-320 | 13/01/2022 | Falcon 9 Block 5 | Unknown | ||
USA-321 | 13/01/2022 | Falcon 9 Block 5 | Unknown | Decayed: 2023-04-01 | |
USA-322 | 13/01/2022 | Falcon 9 Block 5 | Unknown | Decayed: 2023-04-02 | |
USA-323 | 13/01/2022 | Falcon 9 Block 5 | Unknown | Decayed: 2023-04-02 | |
USA-328 | 19/06/2022 | Falcon 9 Block 5 | Unknown | ||
USA-329 | 19/06/2022 | Falcon 9 Block 5 | Unknown | ||
USA-330 | 19/06/2022 | Falcon 9 Block 5 | Unknown | ||
USA-331 | 19/06/2022 | Falcon 9 Block 5 | Unknown | ||
USA-337 | 01/07/2022 | Atlas V 541 | Unknown | ||
USA-334 | 13/07/2022 | Electron | NROL-162 (RASR-3) | ||
USA-335 | 04/08/2022 | Electron | NROL-199 (RASR-4) |
APPENDIX 3 – E-3 Sentry (AWACS) Technical Overview
Mission
The E-3 Sentry is an airborne warning and control system (AWACS) designed for integrated command and control battle management (C2BM), surveillance, target detection, and tracking. It provides a comprehensive, real-time overview of the battlespace, including situational awareness of all friendly, neutral, and hostile entities, and early detection of threats. The aircraft can be deployed in joint, allied, and coalition operations to provide theater-wide surveillance and command and control functions.
Features and Capabilities
Airframe and Radar Configuration:
- Base Aircraft: Modified Boeing 707/320 commercial airframe.
- Radar Dome (Rotodome):
- Dimensions: 30 feet (9.1 meters) in diameter, 6 feet (1.8 meters) thick.
- Mounting Height: 11 feet (3.33 meters) above the fuselage.
- Strut System: Supported by two struts.
- Radar Range: Greater than 250 miles (375.5 km), capable of detecting targets from the Earth’s surface to the stratosphere over land or sea.
- IFF Capability: Integrated Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) subsystem to distinguish between enemy and friendly aircraft.
Surveillance and Detection:
- Provides all-altitude, all-weather surveillance of the battlefield.
- Capable of tracking and identifying low-flying aircraft by filtering out ground clutter.
- Real-time data transmission to command centers for situational awareness and battle management.
Subsystems:
- Avionics
- Navigation
- Communications
- Sensors:
- Radar (primary active surveillance)
- Passive detection systems
- Identification Tools:
- IFF/SIF (Selective Identification Feature)
Mission Suite:
- Consoles display data in graphic and tabular formats.
- Crew responsibilities: surveillance, identification, weapons control, battle management, and communications.
Data Management:
- Broad and detailed battlefield data, including positions of enemy aircraft, ships, and status of friendly forces.
- Data relayed to command centers, supporting air-ground and naval operations.
- In critical situations, data can be forwarded to the President and Secretary of Defense.
Operational Role
Air-to-Ground Operations:
- Supports interdiction, reconnaissance, airlift, and close-air support missions.
- Direct information transmission for maintaining control of air battles.
Air Defense:
- Detects, identifies, and tracks enemy aircraft far from U.S. and NATO borders.
- Directs fighter aircraft for interception and response to detected threats.
C2BM and ISR Integration:
- AWACS can operate standalone or in combination with other C2BM and ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance) elements.
- Participates in decentralized execution of air tasking orders.
- Data exchange via advanced datalinks with C2 systems and tactical assets.
Mobility and Survivability:
- Airborne platform increases survivability over ground-based radar systems.
- Flexible flight path adjustments based on mission requirements and threat environments.
Range and Endurance:
- Flight Duration: 8 hours unrefueled.
- In-flight Refueling: Extends mission duration significantly, supported by onboard crew rest areas.
Development and Evolution
Initial Development:
- First engineering test and evaluation in October 1975.
- Initial delivery to 552nd Air Control Wing in March 1977.
Global Inventory:
- U.S. Air Force Inventory: 31 E-3 Sentry aircraft.
- 27 based at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma.
- 4 at Kadena AB, Japan, and Elmendorf AFB, Alaska.
- NATO: 17 E-3A aircraft delivered since January 1982.
- United Kingdom: 7 E-3 Sentry.
- France: 4 E-3 Sentry.
- Saudi Arabia: 5 E-3 Sentry.
- Japan: 4 AWACS based on Boeing 767 airframes.
Operational History:
- Proven capabilities in major conflicts, including Desert Storm, Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and NATO-led operations like Odyssey Dawn and Unified Protector.
- Continuous support for operations like Northern and Southern Watch, Noble Eagle, and Enduring Freedom.
- Humanitarian missions, including post-hurricane relief in the U.S.
AWACS Reserve Associate Program:
- Established in March 1996, with the 513th Air Control Group responsible for augmenting the active-duty fleet.
Modernization Efforts:
- Radar System Improvement Program (RSIP):
- Enhancements to radar electronic countermeasures.
- Improved system reliability and operational efficiency.
- Block 40/45 Modernization:
- Replaces 1970s-era mission computing with modern, open-system architecture.
- Significant enhancements in C2BM capabilities, completed fleet upgrades by 2020.
General Characteristics
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Primary Function | Airborne battle management, command, and control |
Contractor | Boeing Aerospace Co. |
Power Plant | Four Pratt & Whitney TF33-PW-100A turbofan engines |
Thrust | 20,500 pounds each engine at sea level |
Rotodome | 30 feet (9.1 meters) diameter, 6 feet (1.8 meters) thick |
Wingspan | 145 feet, 9 inches (44.4 meters) |
Length | 152 feet, 11 inches (46.6 meters) |
Height | 41 feet, 9 inches (13 meters) |
Zero Fuel Weight | 205,000 pounds (92,986 kilograms) |
Maximum Takeoff Weight | 325,000 pounds (147,418 kilograms) |
Fuel Capacity | 21,000 gallons (79,494 liters) |
Speed | 360 mph (Mach 0.48) optimum cruise speed |
Range | Over 5,000 nautical miles (9,250 kilometers) |
Ceiling | Above 29,000 feet (8,788 meters) |
Crew | 4 flight crew + 13-19 mission specialists |
Unit Cost | $270 million (1998 fiscal constant dollars) |
Initial Operating Capability | April 1978 |
Active Inventory | 32 aircraft, including one test unit |