A single shot of one of the currently authorized COVID-19 vaccines may be sufficient to provide immunity to individuals who have previously been infected by the virus, thus eliminating the need for a second dose and helping to stretch severely limited vaccine supplies, a study from Mount Sinai has found.
Such a change in public health policy could also spare these individuals the unnecessary side effects of a second dose of vaccine, which researchers found to be significantly greater in individuals with pre-existing immunity to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. A letter to the editor was published today in the New England Journal of Medicine detailing the study.
“We showed that the antibody response to the first vaccine dose in people with pre-existing immunity is equal to or even exceeds the response in uninfected people after the second dose,” says co-author Viviana Simon, MD, Ph.D., Professor in the Departments of Microbiology and Medicine (Infectious Diseases) in the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
Two COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) received emergency use authorization by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2020, and have been administered to millions of people throughout the country.
In Phase 3 trials, both vaccines reported high efficacy in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 infections after two doses given three to four weeks apart. Both vaccines are also well tolerated with few side effects requiring additional medical attention.
In their study of 109 individuals with and without previous SARS-CoV-2 immunity, Mount Sinai researchers, led by Dr. Simon and co-author Florian Krammer, Ph.D., Professor of Vaccinology in the Department of Microbiology, found that the former group developed antibodies within days of the first dose of vaccine at a rate 10 to 20 times higher than those who were uninfected, and at a more than tenfold rate after the second dose.
“These findings suggest that a single dose of vaccine elicits a very rapid immune response in individuals who have tested positive for COVID-19,” says Dr. Krammer. “In fact, that first dose immunologically resembles the booster (second) dose in people who have not been infected.”
The team also investigated systemic reactions after the first dose of vaccine in a second group of 231 individuals, 83 of whom had tested positive for COVID-19, and 148 who had not. While the vaccines were generally well tolerated, injection site symptoms – including pain, swelling, and reddening of the skin—were found in both sub-groups.
In recipients with pre-existing immunity, however, side effects occurred with a significantly higher frequency, including fatigue, headache, chills, fever, and muscle or joint pain.
The intensity of the response to the first dose in people previously infected appears to be similar to the response from people not previously infected after the second dose. The reason for the stronger response in both groups is likely due to the fact the body has already been “primed,” meaning the immune cells have learned how to recognize the spike protein of the virus—the antigen that forms the basis for vaccination. These cells thus respond more vigorously, leading to stronger reactions to the vaccine.
If the infection history of an individual is unknown, Dr. Simon suggests using a serological assay to detect antibodies that might exist to the spike protein. “If the screening process determines the presence of antibodies due to previous infection, then a second shot of the coronavirus vaccine may not be necessary for the individual,” she concludes.
“And if that approach were to translate into public health policy, it could not only expand limited vaccine supplies, but control the more frequent and pronounced reactions to those vaccines experienced by COVID-19 survivors.”
Optimization of dose, schedule and boosters
The speed of vaccine development for SARS-CoV-2 has been unprecedented. However, the time that companies and investigators might have to explore dose optimization and schedule has been reduced by the urgency of development. Fractional dosing has already been used to extend the supply of yellow fever vaccine27,28, and, if lower doses of COVID-19 vaccines prove efficacious and safe, then, particularly when supplies are limited, fractional doses might allow more people to be vaccinated.
AstraZeneca reported that a regimen of half dose followed at least 1 month later by a full dose of chimpanzee adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccine resulted in higher efficacy than two full doses given at least 1 month apart6. Sinovac found that, for their whole-inactivated virus (WIV) vaccine, extending the COVID-19 vaccine dosing interval from 2 to 4 weeks might have improved neutralizing antibody titers12.
Although closer spacing of doses might be advantageous during an outbreak, optimizing the schedule for magnitude and durability of induced responses might potentially make future COVID-19 vaccine campaigns more practical because they allow national programs time to plan and execute more effectively29,30.
We do not know yet whether protective immune responses are durable; perhaps identification of correlates of immune protection will determine what level of an immune biomarker is necessary for protection.
Although the preponderance of evidence suggests that adaptive immune responses elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection are present and might protect against re-infection31, experience with seasonal coronaviruses32 and present experience with SARS-CoV-2 suggest that immunity to natural infection might wane over time, and reinfection has been reported33,34.
Additional booster doses might be necessary to extend the duration of protection; we do not know whether primary series and booster doses can or should be different. It is also unclear whether previously infected persons would benefit from vaccination, although, at this point, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 should occur irrespective of infection status.
reference link: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01230-y
Provided by The Mount Sinai Hospital