The ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia has brought to the forefront a new wave of military innovations, particularly in the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and advanced incendiary weapons. Among these, Ukraine’s utilization of so-called Dragon drones, capable of dispersing thermite on Russian positions, has garnered significant attention.

The employment of thermite, a terrifying incendiary compound known for its extreme heat and destructive potential, has changed the dynamics of the battlefield, adding another layer of lethality to modern warfare. As more Ukrainian units release videos of these drones in action, it is evident that this strategy is rapidly gaining momentum, posing significant challenges for Russian forces entrenched in defensive positions.

Thermite, a mixture of oxidized iron and aluminum, burns at an astonishing temperature of approximately 4,440 degrees Fahrenheit (2,450 degrees Celsius). Historically, thermite has been used in various military applications, including grenades and artillery shells, due to its ability to burn through metal and other materials. In the case of these drones, the compound is deployed from the sky, raining down over treelines, trenches, and other areas where Russian troops seek cover. By burning away foliage and other forms of natural cover, thermite increases the exposure of enemy forces, making them more vulnerable to subsequent attacks. Furthermore, when dropped into trenches or confined spaces, the burning thermite can create a suffocating environment, depriving soldiers of oxygen and causing severe injuries or fatalities.

The psychological impact of these attacks cannot be understated. As a weapon that can strike silently from above, delivering an intense, almost inescapable inferno, thermite drones instill fear and uncertainty among Russian forces. The ability of these drones to operate with pinpoint accuracy further enhances their effectiveness, as they can target specific locations without risking collateral damage to surrounding areas.

One notable example of the use of these drones came from Ukraine’s 60th Mechanized Brigade, which released a video montage on social media showcasing a Dragon drone delivering a thermite payload on a Russian position. The footage, recorded by another drone, captures the moment the incendiary compound ignites, engulfing the area in flames. The brigade’s accompanying statement referred to the drones as “wings of vengeance,” capable of bringing fire from the sky with unparalleled precision. The unit even invoked Vidar, the Norse God of Vengeance, in a symbolic nod to the devastating power of these drones.

This method of warfare has not only been embraced by the 60th Mechanized Brigade but also by other Ukrainian military units, such as the 116th Khorne Group. In a video shared on Telegram, the Khorne Group demonstrated the capabilities of their thermite-dropping drones, which were used to incinerate Russian positions hidden in wooded areas. Despite expressing concerns about the public dissemination of such footage, the group acknowledged the effectiveness of the technology in their fight against Russian forces.

The Ukrainian Defense Ministry (MoD) has also confirmed the use of thermite-carrying drones, marking a significant development in the ongoing conflict. While Ukraine has employed drones in various capacities since the beginning of the war, the integration of thermite represents a new and highly effective form of aerial warfare. Unlike traditional small drones equipped with explosive devices, thermite drones offer wide-area effects, covering larger swathes of land with devastating results. This makes them particularly useful in targeting entrenched positions, where Russian troops might otherwise find refuge.

In contrast to Ukraine’s rapidly advancing drone capabilities, Russian forces appear to be experimenting with similar technologies, albeit on a smaller scale. A video posted on the Ukrainian Landmines and Coffee Telegram channel purportedly shows a Russian drone equipped with thermite elements from a 120mm mortar mine. The video, which lasts just over a minute, depicts the drone hovering close to the ground before releasing its incendiary payload. Although the demonstration highlights the potential for Russia to deploy thermite-dropping drones, the relatively small-scale effects suggest that their development in this area lags behind Ukraine’s more sophisticated efforts.

The use of thermite in the conflict is not entirely new. In May 2022, reports surfaced that Russia had used artillery shells containing thermite to bombard the Ukrainian city of Mariupol. Footage from the attack showed fiery clouds raining down over a large area, indiscriminately burning everything in their path. Similar incidents have been reported in other parts of Ukraine, including the city of Marinka, where thermite-filled artillery shells were allegedly used by Russian forces. These attacks, while devastating, lacked the precision and targeted effectiveness of Ukraine’s thermite-dropping drones.

One of the key advantages of using thermite in drone warfare is the ability to deploy the compound with a high degree of accuracy. Steel Hornets, a Kyiv-based company specializing in drone weaponry, has been promoting the use of thermite munitions for aerial attacks. According to the company, these incendiary devices are designed to ignite in mid-flight and continue burning upon impact. However, the effectiveness of the weapon depends on the conditions of the target area. For example, thermite may not ignite effectively if it lands on a non-flammable surface or if it bounces upon impact. Steel Hornets has also experimented with using thermite in kamikaze drones, further expanding the potential applications of this technology.

While thermite is not explicitly banned under international law, its use in warfare is subject to certain restrictions. The Geneva Convention, specifically Protocol III on the use of incendiary weapons, prohibits the targeting of civilians and civilian infrastructure with such weapons. However, the protocol does allow for the use of incendiary weapons in military operations, provided that they are not employed in areas where civilians are present. Human rights organizations, including Human Rights Watch, have criticized these exceptions as “loopholes,” arguing that incendiary weapons like thermite cause disproportionate harm to both combatants and non-combatants alike.

The ethical and legal implications of using thermite in warfare continue to be a subject of debate. On one hand, proponents argue that the weapon provides a highly effective means of targeting enemy forces in difficult-to-reach areas, such as trenches or heavily wooded terrain. On the other hand, critics point to the long-lasting effects of incendiary weapons, which can cause severe burns, environmental damage, and psychological trauma. Moreover, the indiscriminate nature of thermite attacks—particularly when deployed from the air—raises concerns about unintended casualties and the potential for violations of international humanitarian law.

Despite these concerns, the use of thermite-dropping drones in Ukraine is likely to continue and possibly expand in scope. The war has become a testing ground for new military technologies, with both sides experimenting with innovative ways to gain an advantage on the battlefield. Unmanned aerial vehicles, in particular, have proven to be invaluable assets, allowing for reconnaissance, targeted strikes, and the delivery of incendiary or explosive payloads without risking the lives of pilots or operators.

As the conflict drags on, it is expected that more videos showcasing the use of thermite drones will surface on social media and other platforms. These videos not only serve as propaganda tools, highlighting the effectiveness of Ukraine’s military tactics, but they also provide valuable insights into the evolving nature of modern warfare. The use of drones to disperse thermite represents just one of many advancements in uncrewed technology that has emerged from the conflict, signaling a shift towards more automated and precision-based forms of combat.

In conclusion, Ukraine’s deployment of Dragon drones equipped with thermite has introduced a new dimension to the war with Russia. These drones, capable of delivering wide-area incendiary effects with remarkable precision, have become a key component of Ukraine’s military strategy. While the use of thermite raises ethical and legal questions, its effectiveness in disrupting enemy positions and creating psychological fear cannot be denied. As the war continues to evolve, the role of drones and incendiary weapons like thermite will likely play an increasingly prominent role in shaping the outcome of the conflict.

Technical Details:

• Thermite Reaction: Thermite produces extremely high temperatures, reaching up to 2,450°C (4,440°F), sufficient to melt through metal and other materials. Thermite does not require oxygen from the air to burn, meaning it can function even in water or other environments.
• Grenades: Models like the M14 (used by the U.S.) are designed to disable vehicles and destroy equipment by melting metal parts.
• Artillery: Thermite artillery shells, like Russia’s 9M22S submunitions, disperse the compound over a wide area to create both destructive and psychological impacts.
• Drones: Ukraine has adapted drones to deliver thermite payloads, enhancing their ability to strike entrenched positions without risking operators’ lives​.

Escalation of Modern Warfare: Ukraine’s Use of Thermite Weapons and Russia’s Potential Response in the Global Geopolitical Landscape

The intensifying conflict between Ukraine and Russia has taken numerous forms, from traditional ground warfare to more advanced and innovative strategies. As both sides seek to gain an upper hand, the use of new and terrifying weapons has become a significant concern. If Ukraine were to scale up its use of thermite-based weapons, it would undoubtedly trigger a series of reactions from Russia and potentially alter the geopolitical landscape.

Thermite is a compound that can burn at extremely high temperatures, often used in incendiary devices due to its destructive potential. Its ability to melt through metals and cause widespread fires makes it particularly feared in warfare. In recent years, the adaptation of thermite for use in drones has added a new dimension to its military application. Ukrainian forces have already employed drones carrying thermite in targeted strikes against Russian positions, particularly to disrupt entrenched defenses and create psychological pressure. However, a significant escalation in the use of thermite-based weapons would likely provoke a strong response from Russia.

Russia’s Potential Response

Russia’s reaction to Ukraine’s increased use of thermite weapons would likely be multifaceted, combining military, political, and propaganda efforts to counter the perceived threat. Here are several potential avenues Russia could pursue in response:

• Escalation in Military Tactics: Russia might escalate its own military tactics by deploying more advanced and devastating weapons. While Russia has already employed thermite in artillery shells and other munitions, an increase in Ukraine’s use of thermite could push Russia to retaliate with even more destructive firepower. This might include the use of heavy artillery, thermobaric weapons, or possibly chemical weapons, although the latter would cross a significant red line in international law. Russia’s extensive arsenal of advanced weapons, including its Iskander-M ballistic missile systems and the use of long-range bombers, could be deployed more aggressively to target Ukrainian infrastructure and military positions.
• Increased Use of Unmanned Systems: Russia could also respond by increasing its use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and other autonomous systems. These could be equipped with similar incendiary devices or even more advanced payloads to counter Ukraine’s drone warfare. Russia’s defense industry has been working on a range of UAVs, including armed drones that could be used to strike Ukrainian forces with precision. In addition, Russia might deploy electronic warfare systems to disrupt Ukrainian drone operations, jamming communication links and GPS signals to render Ukrainian drones ineffective.
• Psychological and Information Warfare: Russia is likely to ramp up its psychological and information warfare campaigns. The use of thermite, with its horrific effects, would provide ample material for Russian propaganda to portray Ukrainian forces as brutal and inhumane. Russia would likely highlight civilian casualties and the destructive nature of thermite to turn international opinion against Ukraine. This could involve spreading disinformation through state-controlled media and social media platforms, accusing Ukraine of war crimes and framing their use of thermite as a violation of international law.
• Diplomatic Pressure: On the diplomatic front, Russia would likely increase pressure on international bodies such as the United Nations and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Moscow might push for resolutions condemning Ukraine’s use of incendiary weapons and seek to rally support from its allies. Countries sympathetic to Russia’s position, such as China or those in the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), might also be mobilized to issue statements or take diplomatic actions in support of Russia’s stance.
• Retaliatory Strikes and Targeted Assassinations: Russia’s response might also include targeted strikes against Ukrainian leadership or key military figures. Moscow has a long history of using assassination as a tool of statecraft, and an escalation in the conflict could see the return of such tactics. Additionally, Russia could conduct cyber-attacks aimed at disrupting Ukrainian military communications and command structures, further complicating Ukraine’s ability to coordinate its forces.
• Increased Support for Separatist Movements: Another potential reaction from Russia could be the bolstering of separatist movements within Ukraine. By increasing support for the self-proclaimed Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics, Russia could attempt to further destabilize Ukraine from within. This could involve the provision of more advanced weapons, training, and financial support to separatist forces, allowing them to carry out more effective operations against Ukrainian forces.

NATO’s Role and Thermite-Based Weapons

NATO’s involvement in the conflict, while limited to non-direct engagement, has included the provision of military aid and intelligence to Ukraine. Several NATO member states possess weapons that contain thermite or similar incendiary compounds. These weapons are primarily used for specific military purposes, such as demolition or disabling enemy equipment, and are not typically intended for large-scale use against personnel. Here are some of the NATO weapons that utilize thermite:

• M14 Thermite Grenade (United States): The M14 thermite grenade is a standard-issue weapon in the U.S. military, used to destroy equipment, vehicles, and other materials. It generates heat in excess of 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit, making it capable of melting through metal and other materials. The grenade is often used to disable enemy weapons, destroy sensitive equipment, or create breaches in fortified positions.
• Scalable Thermite Breaching Tool (United States): This is a more recent development aimed at providing soldiers with a lightweight breaching tool that can cut through steel and other materials. The Scalable Thermite Breaching Tool is designed for use in urban warfare and other scenarios where quick entry is required. It allows soldiers to breach obstacles with minimal noise and without the need for heavy equipment or explosives.
• Thermite-Based Artillery Shells: While thermite is not commonly used in artillery shells within NATO forces, there are experimental or specialized munitions that have been developed for specific purposes. These shells are typically designed to create fires or destroy equipment rather than to be used as direct anti-personnel weapons.
• Thermite Incendiary Munitions (United Kingdom): The British military has a history of using thermite-based munitions, particularly during World War II. While modern usage is more restricted, the UK still retains the capability to deploy thermite-based incendiary devices for specific missions, such as the destruction of equipment or infrastructure.

Strategic Picture

The strategic picture following Ukraine’s increased use of thermite-based weapons would be complex and fraught with risks. The use of such weapons could lead to a significant escalation in the conflict, drawing in additional actors and potentially leading to a broader confrontation between NATO and Russia. Here is a detailed analysis of the potential scenarios:

• Escalation of the Conflict: The use of thermite on a larger scale could push the conflict into a more destructive phase. Russia, facing increased pressure from Ukrainian forces, might resort to more extreme measures, including the use of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). While unlikely, the threat of chemical or even nuclear weapons cannot be entirely dismissed, especially if Russia perceives that it is losing control of the situation.
• NATO’s Dilemma: NATO would face a difficult choice in responding to the conflict. On one hand, it would be under pressure to support Ukraine, both morally and militarily. On the other hand, any direct involvement could risk a full-scale war with Russia. NATO’s response would likely focus on increasing sanctions against Russia, providing more advanced weapons to Ukraine, and stepping up intelligence sharing. However, the alliance would also need to be cautious in order to avoid provoking a wider conflict.
• Humanitarian Crisis: The use of thermite would exacerbate the already dire humanitarian situation in Ukraine. The destruction caused by incendiary weapons could lead to more civilian casualties, widespread displacement, and damage to critical infrastructure. Humanitarian organizations would struggle to provide aid in areas affected by thermite strikes, and the long-term environmental impact of such weapons would add another layer of suffering for the civilian population.
• International Condemnation: Both Russia and Ukraine would likely face condemnation from the international community for their use of incendiary weapons. While Ukraine might argue that its use of thermite is a necessary response to Russian aggression, the optics of using such a destructive weapon would not play well on the global stage. Human rights organizations and neutral states might call for investigations into potential war crimes, further complicating the diplomatic situation.
• Prolonged Conflict: If neither side is able to gain a decisive advantage, the conflict could become prolonged, with both Ukraine and Russia locked in a cycle of retaliation. This would have severe consequences for the region, with continued destruction, economic collapse, and the risk of the conflict spilling over into neighboring countries. The longer the conflict drags on, the more difficult it will be for any peace settlement to be reached, as both sides become more entrenched in their positions.
• Impact on Global Security: The escalation of the conflict in Ukraine could have broader implications for global security. Other nations might see the use of thermite and other advanced weapons as a precedent, leading to an arms race or the proliferation of such weapons in other conflicts. Additionally, the conflict could strain relationships between NATO and non-aligned nations, as they are forced to take sides in the growing geopolitical divide.
• Economic Fallout: The economic impact of the conflict would also be significant. Increased sanctions on Russia would lead to further disruptions in global energy markets, with Europe particularly affected by the loss of Russian oil and gas supplies. The global economy, already weakened by the COVID-19 pandemic, would face additional challenges as supply chains are disrupted and investor confidence falters. The cost of rebuilding Ukraine after the conflict would be immense, requiring substantial international aid and investment.

The use of thermite-based weapons by Ukraine, while potentially effective in the short term, carries significant risks. It could provoke a dangerous escalation in the conflict, leading to even greater destruction and loss of life. NATO’s involvement, while supportive of Ukraine

Copyright of debuglies.com
Even partial reproduction of the contents is not permitted without prior authorization – Reproduction reserved